707 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28012977)
1. Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial.
Dikmans RE; Negenborn VL; Bouman MB; Winters HA; Twisk JW; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MA; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NA; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RR; Ritt MJ; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Feb; 18(2):251-258. PubMed ID: 28012977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage breast reconstruction (BRIOS): primary outcome of a randomised, controlled trial.
Negenborn VL; Young-Afat DA; Dikmans REG; Smit JM; Winters HAH; Don Griot JPW; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Lapid O; Moerman E; van Turnhout AAWM; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Lancet Oncol; 2018 Sep; 19(9):1205-1214. PubMed ID: 30104147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix: Safety Data From an Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial in the Setting of Breast Cancer Treatment.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Roy PG; Johansson H; Brandberg Y; Eriksen C; Frisell J
Ann Surg; 2019 May; 269(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 30308615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-term cost-effectiveness of one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix versus two-stage expander-implant reconstruction from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Smit JM; Dikmans REG; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Tuinder S; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2019 Apr; 106(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 30835827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy With and Without Acellular Dermal Matrix Among Women With Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Brandberg Y; Frisell J
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Oct; 4(10):e2127806. PubMed ID: 34596671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acellular dermal matrices as an adjunct to implant breast reconstruction: Analysis of outcomes and complications.
Tasoulis MK; Teoh V; Khan A; Montgomery C; Mohammed K; Gui G
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Apr; 46(4 Pt A):511-515. PubMed ID: 31706716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A direct comparison of porcine (Strattice™) and bovine (Surgimend™) acellular dermal matrices in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction.
Ball JF; Sheena Y; Tarek Saleh DM; Forouhi P; Benyon SL; Irwin MS; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 28624524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction with the use of bovine-derived acellular dermal matrix (SurgiMend™) in implant based immediate reconstruction following skin sparing mastectomy: A prospective observational study in a single centre.
Headon H; Kasem A; Manson A; Choy C; Carmichael AR; Mokbel K
Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 25(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 27312036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of life and patient satisfaction after implant-based breast reconstruction with or without acellular dermal matrix: randomized clinical trial.
Lohmander F; Lagergren J; Johansson H; Roy PG; Frisell J; Brandberg Y
BJS Open; 2020 Oct; 4(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 32762012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of the use of acellular-dermal matrix to assist implant-based breast reconstruction in a single centre.
Barber MD; Williams L; Anderson ED; Neades GT; Raine C; Young O; Kulkarni D; Young I; Dixon JM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):100-5. PubMed ID: 25238954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does the use of acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in women undergoing pre-pectoral implant-based breast reconstruction increase operative success versus non-use of ADM in the same setting? A systematic review protocol.
Cook H; Zargaran D; Glynou SP; Hamilton S; Mosahebi A
Syst Rev; 2024 Jun; 13(1):153. PubMed ID: 38849880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Multi Centre Canadian Acellular Dermal Matrix Trial (MCCAT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in implant-based breast reconstruction.
Zhong T; Temple-Oberle C; Hofer SO; Beber B; Semple J; Brown M; Macadam S; Lennox P; Panzarella T; McCarthy C; Baxter N;
Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():356. PubMed ID: 24165392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction using a prosthesis and lower dermal flap: description of five cases].
Clerico C; Ihrai T; Raoust I; Chignon-Sicard B; Georgiou C; Flipo B
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2012 Dec; 57(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 22868066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction - A prospective randomized trial.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Schrenk P; Bjelic-Radisic V; Unterrieder K; Leser C; Fink-Retter A; Salama M; Singer C
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 May; 42(5):665-71. PubMed ID: 26947961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: Higher complication rate vs cosmetic benefits.
Gschwantler-Kaulich D; Leser C; Salama M; Singer CF
Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):957-964. PubMed ID: 30230119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictors of complications after direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix from a multicentre randomized clinical trial.
Negenborn VL; Dikmans REG; Bouman MB; Winters HAH; Twisk JWR; Ruhé PQ; Mureau MAM; Smit JM; Tuinder S; Hommes J; Eltahir Y; Posch NAS; van Steveninck-Barends JM; Meesters-Caberg MA; van der Hulst RRWJ; Ritt MJPF; Mullender MG
Br J Surg; 2018 Sep; 105(10):1305-1312. PubMed ID: 29663320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BROWSE: A multicentre comparison of nine year outcomes in acellular dermal matrix based and complete submuscular implant-based immediate breast reconstruction-aesthetics, capsular contracture and patient reported outcomes.
Wilson RL; Kirwan CC; O'Donoghue JM; Linforth RA; Johnson RK; Harvey JR
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2022 Jan; 48(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 34836730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Reconstructive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients With Preexisting Subpectoral Implants: Implant-Sparing Mastectomy With Delayed Implant Exchange Versus Immediate Tissue Expander Reconstruction.
Parabkaharan S; Melody M; Trotta R; Lleshi A; Sun W; Smith PD; Khakpour N; Dayicioglu D
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jun; 76 Suppl 4():S332-5. PubMed ID: 27187252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review: Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies Comparing Use of Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM) Versus Without ADM.
Ng TP; Loo BYK; Yong N; Chia CLK; Lohsiriwat V
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 May; 31(5):3366-3376. PubMed ID: 38285304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Single-stage breast reconstruction using Strattice™: A retrospective study.
Dikmans RE; El Morabit F; Ottenhof MJ; Tuinder SM; Twisk JW; Moues C; Bouman MB; Mullender MG
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Feb; 69(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 26723835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
