308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28013126)
1. Optimization of MBR hydrodynamics for cake layer fouling control through CFD simulation and RSM design.
Yang M; Yu D; Liu M; Zheng L; Zheng X; Wei Y; Wang F; Fan Y
Bioresour Technol; 2017 Mar; 227():102-111. PubMed ID: 28013126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. CFD simulation and optimization of membrane scouring and nitrogen removal for an airlift external circulation membrane bioreactor.
Yang M; Wei Y; Zheng X; Wang F; Yuan X; Liu J; Luo N; Xu R; Yu D; Fan Y
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 219():566-575. PubMed ID: 27540633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics.
Ping Chu H; Li XY
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 May; 90(3):323-31. PubMed ID: 15800862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Numerical optimization of membrane module design and operation for a full-scale submerged MBR by computational fluid dynamics.
Liu M; Yang M; Chen M; Yu D; Zheng J; Chang J; Wang X; Ji C; Wei Y
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Dec; 269():300-308. PubMed ID: 30195222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental and CFD simulation studies of wall shear stress for different impeller configurations and MBR activated sludge.
Ratkovich N; Chan CC; Bentzen TR; Rasmussen MR
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(11):2061-70. PubMed ID: 22592479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical and numerical modelling of Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquid in a rotational cross-flow MBR.
Bentzen TR; Ratkovich N; Madsen S; Jensen JC; Bak SN; Rasmussen MR
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(11):2318-27. PubMed ID: 23032760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of four types of membrane bioreactor systems in terms of shear stress over the membrane surface using computational fluid dynamics.
Ratkovich N; Bentzen TR
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(12):2534-44. PubMed ID: 24355838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clogging vs. fouling in immersed membrane bioreactors.
Buzatu P; Qiblawey H; Odai A; Jamaleddin J; Nasser M; Judd SJ
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():46-54. PubMed ID: 30014978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Numerical simulation of bubble induced shear in membrane bioreactors: effects of mixed liquor rheology and membrane configuration.
Liu X; Wang Y; Waite TD; Leslie G
Water Res; 2015 May; 75():131-45. PubMed ID: 25768986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of fine bubble aeration intensity on membrane bioreactor sludge characteristics and fouling.
De Temmerman L; Maere T; Temmink H; Zwijnenburg A; Nopens I
Water Res; 2015 Jun; 76():99-109. PubMed ID: 25794465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of computational non-Newtonian fluid model for membrane bioreactor.
Sørensen L; Bentzen TR; Skov K
Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(10):1810-6. PubMed ID: 26540543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydraulic optimization of membrane bioreactor via baffle modification using computational fluid dynamics.
Yan X; Xiao K; Liang S; Lei T; Liang P; Xue T; Yu K; Guan J; Huang X
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jan; 175():633-7. PubMed ID: 25465790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydrodynamic effects of air sparging on hollow fiber membranes in a bubble column reactor.
Xia L; Law AW; Fane AG
Water Res; 2013 Jul; 47(11):3762-72. PubMed ID: 23726713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison study on membrane fouling in a sponge-submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor.
Deng L; Guo W; Ngo HH; Zhang J; Liang S; Xia S; Zhang Z; Li J
Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():69-74. PubMed ID: 24661815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Change in the fouling propensity of sludge in membrane bioreactors (MBR) in relation to the accumulation of biopolymer clusters.
Sun FY; Wang XM; Li XY
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4718-25. PubMed ID: 21316942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hydrodynamic optimization of membrane bioreactor by horizontal geometry modification using computational fluid dynamics.
Yan X; Wu Q; Sun J; Liang P; Zhang X; Xiao K; Huang X
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Jan; 200():328-34. PubMed ID: 26512855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simulation and optimization of airlift external circulation membrane bioreactor using computational fluid dynamics.
Qing Z; Rongle X; Xiang Z; Yaobo F
Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(9):1846-52. PubMed ID: 24804658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Side-stream membrane bioreactors: Influence of stress generated by hydrodynamics on floc structure, supernatant quality and fouling propensity.
Stricot M; Filali A; Lesage N; Spérandio M; Cabassud C
Water Res; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2113-24. PubMed ID: 20060557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cake layer bacterial communities during different biofouling stages in full-scale membrane bioreactors.
Takada K; Shiba T; Yamaguchi T; Akane Y; Nakayama Y; Soda S; Inoue D; Ike M
Bioresour Technol; 2018 Jul; 259():259-267. PubMed ID: 29571169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
