These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28013284)

  • 1. CT sizing for left atrial appendage closure is associated with favourable outcomes for procedural safety.
    Rajwani A; Nelson AJ; Shirazi MG; Disney PJS; Teo KSL; Wong DTL; Young GD; Worthley SG
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Dec; 18(12):1361-1368. PubMed ID: 28013284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computed tomography measurement of the left atrial appendage for optimal sizing of the Watchman device.
    Xu B; Betancor J; Sato K; Harb S; Abdur Rehman K; Patel K; Kumar A; Cremer PC; Jaber W; Rodriguez LL; Schoenhagen P; Wazni O
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 29223726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and effects of volume loading during transesophageal echocardiography in the pre-procedural work-up for left atrial appendage closure.
    Freitas-Ferraz AB; Bernier M; O'Connor K; Beaudoin J; Champagne J; Paradis JM; O'Hara G; Muntané-Carol G; Alperi A; Faroux L; Junquera L; Rodés-Cabau J
    Cardiovasc Ultrasound; 2021 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 33388071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left atrial appendage orifice diameter measured with trans-esophageal echocardiography is independently related with peri-device leakage after Watchman device implantation.
    Chen YY; Zhang YH; Chen X; Huang WP; Xu B; Su X; Chen YH
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1831-1839. PubMed ID: 31321654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First experience with the Watchman FLX occluder for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.
    Seeger J; Birkemeyer R; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(7):512-516. PubMed ID: 28495117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of left atrial appendage measurements between conventional transesophageal echocardiography and "Virtual TEE" reconstructed from computed tomography for pre-procedural planning of device closure.
    Cho N; Nakajima Y; Kubo S; Hara H; Nanasato M; Hozawa M; Doi A; Morino Y
    Heart Vessels; 2024 Jun; 39(6):539-548. PubMed ID: 38329512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of a Novel Septal Occluder Device for Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Postsurgical and Postlariat Leaks or Anatomies Unsuitable for Conventional Percutaneous Occlusion.
    Della Rocca DG; Horton RP; Tarantino N; Van Niekerk CJ; Trivedi C; Chen Q; Mohanty S; Anannab A; Murtaza G; Akella K; Gianni C; Bassiouny M; Ahmadian-Tehrani A; Al-Ahmad A; Burkhardt JD; Natale VN; Price M; Gallinghouse GJ; Gibson DN; Lakkireddy D; Di Biase L; Natale A
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Oct; 13(10):e009227. PubMed ID: 32942913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the left atrial appendage with real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: implications for catheter-based left atrial appendage closure.
    Nucifora G; Faletra FF; Regoli F; Pasotti E; Pedrazzini G; Moccetti T; Auricchio A
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):514-23. PubMed ID: 21737601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of left atrial appendage parameters using computed tomography vs. transesophageal echocardiography for watchman device implantation: a systematic review & meta-analysis.
    Sattar Y; Kompella R; Ahmad B; Aamir M; Suleiman AM; Zghouzi M; Ullah W; Zafrullah F; Elgendy IY; Balla S; Kawsara A; Alraies MC
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Feb; 20(2):151-160. PubMed ID: 35172121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of the left atrial appendage orifice perimeter of 3D model based on 3D TEE data in the choice of device size of LAmbre™ occluder.
    Jia D; Zhou Q; Song HN; Zhang L; Chen JL; Liu Y; Kong B; He FZ; Wang YJ; Yang YT
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Oct; 35(10):1841-1851. PubMed ID: 31134413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in Left Atrial Appendage Dimensions Following Volume Loading During Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure.
    Spencer RJ; DeJong P; Fahmy P; Lempereur M; Tsang MYC; Gin KG; Lee PK; Nair P; Tsang TSM; Jue J; Saw J
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Dec; 8(15):1935-1941. PubMed ID: 26738661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiac CT and echocardiographic evaluation of peri-device flow after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the AMPLATZER cardiac plug device.
    Jaguszewski M; Manes C; Puippe G; Salzberg S; Müller M; Falk V; Lüscher T; Luft A; Alkadhi H; Landmesser U
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 85(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 25205611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Device Sizing Guided by Echocardiography-Based Three-Dimensional Printing Is Associated with Superior Outcome after Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.
    Fan Y; Yang F; Cheung GS; Chan AK; Wang DD; Lam YY; Chow MC; Leong MC; Kam KK; So KC; Tse G; Qiao Z; He B; Kwok KW; Lee AP
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2019 Jun; 32(6):708-719.e1. PubMed ID: 30948144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of left atrial appendage device closure following chronically failed surgical ligation.
    Ellis CR; Metawee M; Piana RN; Bennett JM; Pretorius M; Deegan RJ
    Heart Rhythm; 2019 Jan; 16(1):12-17. PubMed ID: 30012348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Left atrial appendage closure with the Amplatzer™ Cardiac Plug: impact of shape and device sizing on follow-up leaks.
    Freixa X; Tzikas A; Sobrino A; Chan J; Basmadjian AJ; Ibrahim R
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1023-7. PubMed ID: 23273340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography for left atrial appendage sizing and percutaneous occlusion guidance.
    Della Rocca DG; Magnocavallo M; Gianni C; Mohanty S; Al-Ahmad A; Bassiouny M; Denora M; La Fazia VM; Lavalle C; Gallinghouse GJ; Santangeli P; Polselli M; Sarkozy A; Vetta G; Ahmed A; Sanchez JE; Pannone L; Chierchia GB; Tschopp DR; de Asmundis C; Di Biase L; Lakkireddy D; Burkhardt DJ; Horton RP; Natale A
    Europace; 2023 Dec; 26(1):. PubMed ID: 38225176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT based 3D printing is superior to transesophageal echocardiography for pre-procedure planning in left atrial appendage device closure.
    Obasare E; Mainigi SK; Morris DL; Slipczuk L; Goykhman I; Friend E; Ziccardi MR; Pressman GS
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 34(5):821-831. PubMed ID: 29222738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage: The value of real time 3D transesophageal echocardiography and the intraoperative change in the size of the left atrial appendage.
    Zhang L; Cong T; Liu A
    Echocardiography; 2019 Mar; 36(3):537-545. PubMed ID: 30735281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing Measurements of CT Angiography, TEE, and Fluoroscopy of the Left Atrial Appendage for Percutaneous Closure.
    Saw J; Fahmy P; Spencer R; Prakash R; McLaughlin P; Nicolaou S; Tsang M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Apr; 27(4):414-22. PubMed ID: 26728988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Left atrial appendage patency and device-related thrombus after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: a computed tomography study.
    Cochet H; Iriart X; Sridi S; Camaioni C; Corneloup O; Montaudon M; Laurent F; Selmi W; Renou P; Jalal Z; Thambo JB
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 29415203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.