These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Development of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score to predict serious adverse events after emergency department assessment of syncope. Thiruganasambandamoorthy V; Kwong K; Wells GA; Sivilotti MLA; Mukarram M; Rowe BH; Lang E; Perry JJ; Sheldon R; Stiell IG; Taljaard M CMAJ; 2016 Sep; 188(12):E289-E298. PubMed ID: 27378464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The San Francisco Syncope Rule vs physician judgment and decision making. Quinn JV; Stiell IG; McDermott DA; Kohn MA; Wells GA Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):782-6. PubMed ID: 16182988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Syncope risk stratification tools vs clinical judgment: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Costantino G; Casazza G; Reed M; Bossi I; Sun B; Del Rosso A; Ungar A; Grossman S; D'Ascenzo F; Quinn J; McDermott D; Sheldon R; Furlan R Am J Med; 2014 Nov; 127(11):1126.e13-1126.e25. PubMed ID: 24862309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deceleration capacity as a risk predictor in patients presenting to the emergency department with syncope: A prospective exploratory pilot study. Duckheim M; Klee K; Götz N; Helle P; Groga-Bada P; Mizera L; Gawaz M; Zuern CS; Eick C Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(49):e8605. PubMed ID: 29245221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrocardiogram findings in emergency department patients with syncope. Quinn J; McDermott D Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):714-8. PubMed ID: 21762234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. San Francisco Syncope Rule, Osservatorio Epidemiologico sulla Sincope nel Lazio risk score, and clinical judgment in the assessment of short-term outcome of syncope. Dipaola F; Costantino G; Perego F; Borella M; Galli A; Cantoni G; Barbic F; Casella F; Duca PG; Furlan R; Am J Emerg Med; 2010 May; 28(4):432-9. PubMed ID: 20466221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. One-year prognosis after syncope and the failure of the ROSE decision instrument to predict one-year adverse events. Reed MJ; Henderson SS; Newby DE; Gray AJ Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Sep; 58(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 21288597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. ECG Predictors of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Older Adults With Syncope. Nishijima DK; Lin AL; Weiss RE; Yagapen AN; Malveau SE; Adler DH; Bastani A; Baugh CW; Caterino JM; Clark CL; Diercks DB; Hollander JE; Nicks BA; Shah MN; Stiffler KA; Storrow AB; Wilber ST; Sun BC Ann Emerg Med; 2018 Apr; 71(4):452-461.e3. PubMed ID: 29275946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A New Feasible Syncope Risk Score Appropriate for Emergency Department: A Prospective Cohort Study. Bozorgi A; Hosseini K; Jalali A; Tajdini M Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 17(3):151-154. PubMed ID: 30044256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines. Reed MJ; Newby DE; Coull AJ; Jacques KG; Prescott RJ; Gray AJ Emerg Med J; 2007 Apr; 24(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 17384381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 30 day predicted outcome in undifferentiated chest pain: multicenter validation of the HEART score in Tunisian population. Khalil MH; Sekma A; Yaakoubi H; Bel Haj Ali K; Msolli MA; Beltaief K; Grissa MH; Boubaker H; Sassi M; Chouchene H; Hassen Y; Ben Soltane H; Mezgar Z; Boukef R; Bouida W; Nouira S BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2021 Nov; 21(1):555. PubMed ID: 34798811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Emergency department management of syncope: need for standardization and improved risk stratification. Thiruganasambandamoorthy V; Taljaard M; Stiell IG; Sivilotti ML; Murray H; Vaidyanathan A; Rowe BH; Calder LA; Lang E; McRae A; Sheldon R; Wells GA Intern Emerg Med; 2015 Aug; 10(5):619-27. PubMed ID: 25918108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient stratification based on the risk of severe illness in emergency departments through collaborative machine learning models. Chen JY; Hsieh CC; Lee JT; Lin CH; Kao CY Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Aug; 82():142-152. PubMed ID: 38908339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the Predictive Value of Combining Risk Scoring Systems and Ultrasonography for Short-Term Adverse Outcomes in Syncope: A Prospective Observational Study. Sekreter T; Altuncı YA; Uz İ; Akarca FK J Emerg Med; 2024 Aug; 67(2):e198-e208. PubMed ID: 38824037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score. Thiruganasambandamoorthy V; Sivilotti MLA; Le Sage N; Yan JW; Huang P; Hegdekar M; Mercier E; Mukarram M; Nemnom MJ; McRae AD; Rowe BH; Stiell IG; Wells GA; Krahn AD; Taljaard M JAMA Intern Med; 2020 May; 180(5):737-744. PubMed ID: 32202605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial neural networks predict the incidence of portosplenomesenteric venous thrombosis in patients with acute pancreatitis. Fei Y; Hu J; Li WQ; Wang W; Zong GQ J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):439-445. PubMed ID: 27960048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]