These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2801818)

  • 1. The measuring of blood pressure during pregnancy.
    Villar J; Repke J; Markush L; Calvert W; Rhoads G
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Oct; 161(4):1019-24. PubMed ID: 2801818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which Korotkoff sound should be used for the diastolic blood pressure in pregnancy?
    Duggan PM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 May; 38(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 9653859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measuring blood pressure in pregnant women: a comparison of direct and indirect methods.
    Brown MA; Reiter L; Smith B; Buddle ML; Morris R; Whitworth JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 171(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 8092212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical evaluation of the sphygmomat 2 semi-automatic blood pressure monitor.
    Prior AJ; Peck K; Davies P; Beevers DG
    J Med Eng Technol; 1990; 14(6):250-3. PubMed ID: 2283674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.
    de Gaudemaris R; Folsom AR; Prineas RJ; Luepker RV
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 121(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 4014120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lack of reproducibility in pregnancy of Korotkoff phase IV as measured by mercury sphygmomanometry.
    Shennan A; Gupta M; Halligan A; Taylor DJ; de Swiet M
    Lancet; 1996 Jan; 347(8995):139-42. PubMed ID: 8544546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fourth sound of Korotkoff in pregnancy: a myth.
    Franx A; Evers IM; van der Pant KA; van der Post JA; Bruinse HW; Visser GH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Jan; 76(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 9481548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy: validation of the TM-2420 monitor.
    Clark S; Hofmeyr GJ; Coats AJ; Redman CW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jan; 77(1):152-5. PubMed ID: 1984216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Indirect blood pressure measurement in pregnancy: Korotkoff phase 4 versus phase 5.
    Johenning AR; Barron WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 167(3):577-80. PubMed ID: 1530006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Properties of the random zero sphygmomanometer.
    Kronmal RA; Rutan GH; Manolio TA; Borhani NO
    Hypertension; 1993 May; 21(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 8491498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Hypertension Prevention Trial: assessment of the quality of blood pressure measurements.
    Canner PL; Borhani NO; Oberman A; Cutler J; Prineas RJ; Langford H; Hooper FJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 1991 Aug; 134(4):379-92. PubMed ID: 1877599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Random-zero sphygmomanometer, Rose's tape, and the accuracy of the blood pressure measurements in children.
    Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Uhari M
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Aug; 32(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 1508618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the use of a semiautomated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer in the hypertension clinic.
    Prasad N; Wheeldon NM; MacDonald TM
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(6):307-9. PubMed ID: 7848794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparative study of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitors with standard zero and random zero sphygmomanometers].
    Tislér A; Barna I; Châtel R
    Orv Hetil; 1994 Jun; 135(26):1415-9. PubMed ID: 8028897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
    Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measured differences between fourth and fifth phase diastolic blood pressures in 4885 adults: implications for blood pressure surveys.
    Folsom AR; Prineas RJ; Jacobs DR; Luepker RV; Gillum RF
    Int J Epidemiol; 1984 Dec; 13(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 6519881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How should diastolic blood pressure be defined during pregnancy?
    Blank SG; Helseth G; Pickering TG; West JE; August P
    Hypertension; 1994 Aug; 24(2):234-40. PubMed ID: 8039849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Potential problems with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.
    Birkett NJ
    Hypertension; 1994 Feb; 23(2):254-7. PubMed ID: 8307636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.