These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28018424)

  • 21. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Helping to distinguish primary from secondary transfer events for trace DNA.
    Taylor D; Biedermann A; Samie L; Pun KM; Hicks T; Champod C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 May; 28():155-177. PubMed ID: 28273508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions.
    Evett IW; Jackson G; Lambert JA
    Sci Justice; 2000; 40(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 10795422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Questions, propositions and assessing different levels of evidence: Forensic voice comparison in practice.
    Hughes V; Rhodes R
    Sci Justice; 2018 Jul; 58(4):250-257. PubMed ID: 29895456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Interpretation of a paint cross-transfer on a burglary scene - A case report.
    Vanneste F; Lim-Hitchings YC; Massonnet G; Lunstroot K
    Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):258-263. PubMed ID: 38735660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. When evaluating DNA evidence within a likelihood ratio framework, should the propositions be exhaustive?
    Buckleton J; Taylor D; Bright JA; Hicks T; Curran J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102406. PubMed ID: 33142191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.
    Cerbo AD
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2021; 32(4):293-295. PubMed ID: 34964106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. From frequented environments to the crime scene: Evaluating findings of fibre comparisons in complex transfer scenarios.
    Lim-Hitchings YC; Taroni F; Massonnet G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jun; 361():112086. PubMed ID: 38852532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The origin of informed consent].
    Mallardi V
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].
    ; ;
    Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi; 2024 Feb; 47(2):101-119. PubMed ID: 38309959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The 'factor of two' issue in mixed DNA profiles.
    Taylor D; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():300-6. PubMed ID: 25158162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct and Secondary Transfer of Touch DNA on a Credit Card: Evidence Evaluation Given Activity Level Propositions and Application of Bayesian Networks.
    Onofri M; Altomare C; Severini S; Tommolini F; Lancia M; Carlini L; Gambelunghe C; Carnevali E
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Apr; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 37239356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Practical Guide for the Formulation of Propositions in the Bayesian Approach to DNA Evidence Interpretation in an Adversarial Environment.
    Gittelson S; Kalafut T; Myers S; Taylor D; Hicks T; Taroni F; Evett IW; Bright JA; Buckleton J
    J Forensic Sci; 2016 Jan; 61(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 26248867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Helping formulate propositions in forensic DNA analysis.
    Buckleton J; Bright JA; Taylor D; Evett I; Hicks T; Jackson G; Curran JM
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 25002042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Source level interpretation of mixed biological stains using coding region SNPs.
    Dørum G; Bleka Ø; Gill P; Haas C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102685. PubMed ID: 35381476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Enhancement of Plant Productivity in the Post-Genomics Era.
    Thao NP; Tran LS
    Curr Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(4):295-6. PubMed ID: 27499678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Critical analysis of forensic cut-offs and legal thresholds: A coherent approach to inference and decision.
    Biedermann A; Taroni F; Bozza S; Augsburger M; Aitken CGG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():72-80. PubMed ID: 29734052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Must the random man be unrelated? A lingering misconception in forensic genetics.
    Milot E; Baechler S; Crispino F
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2020; 2():35-40. PubMed ID: 32411996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Regarding: Rosenthal DI, Glatstein E. "We've Got a Treatment, but What's the Disease?" The Oncologist 1996;1.
    Lunsford LD; Flickinger JC; Larson D
    Oncologist; 1997; 2(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 10388030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
    Allen D; Gillen E; Rixson L
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2009; 7(3):80-129. PubMed ID: 27820426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.