114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28018543)
1. Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews.
Hern HG; Wills CP; Alter HJ; Bowman SH; Burns BD; Loyd J; Schneider JI; Yarris LM
J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 8(5):759-762. PubMed ID: 28018543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Residency applicants prefer online system for scheduling interviews.
Wills C; Hern HG; Alter H
West J Emerg Med; 2015 Mar; 16(2):352-4. PubMed ID: 25834686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized Residency Interview Scheduling: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Categorical General Surgery Applicants.
Hoops HE; Brasel KJ; Stephens CQ; Anderson EM; LeBlanc L; Krishnaswami S
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 30025941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Novel Collaboration to Reduce the Travel-Related Cost of Residency Interviewing.
Shappell E; Fant A; Schnapp B; Craig JP; Ahn J; Babcock C; Gisondi MA
West J Emerg Med; 2017 Apr; 18(3):539-543. PubMed ID: 28435508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience.
Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA
J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Current Applicant Perceptions of the Ophthalmology Residency Match.
Venincasa MJ; Cai LZ; Gedde SJ; Uhler T; Sridhar J
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2020 May; 138(5):460-466. PubMed ID: 32163107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Applicants' Interview Experience of Family Medicine Residency Match: Reflections from a Quality Improvement Initiative at a Community Hospital.
Waheed A; Rana MS; Rauf MA; Green L; Green S; Azhar E
Cureus; 2020 Oct; 12(10):e11054. PubMed ID: 33101791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. General surgery applicant perspectives: Two years of virtual interview experiences and supplemental application impressions.
Quinn KM; Runge LT; Parrado RH; White JA; Talley CL; Streck CJ; Abbott AM
Am J Surg; 2024 Jun; 232():26-30. PubMed ID: 38042720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Finding the Next Resident Physicians in the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: An Applicant Survey on the 2020 Virtual Urology Residency Match.
Spencer E; Ambinder D; Christiano C; Phillips J; Choudhury M; Matthews G; Fullerton S; Dyer L; Zelkovic P; Eshghi M; Wong NC
Urology; 2021 Nov; 157():44-50. PubMed ID: 34284010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study.
Vadi MG; Malkin MR; Lenart J; Stier GR; Gatling JW; Applegate RL
Int J Med Educ; 2016 Apr; 7():102-8. PubMed ID: 27039029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual Interviews in Neurosurgery Resident Selection-A Work in Progress.
Mohanty A; Caldwell DJ; Hadley CC; Gibson A; Ravanpay A; Patel AJ
World Neurosurg; 2021 Nov; 155():e412-e417. PubMed ID: 34428584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Invited applicant evaluation of an online interview scheduler implemented by a residency program in obstetrics and gynecology.
Metheny WP
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):109-12. PubMed ID: 17601904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residency match interview scheduling: quantifying the applicant experience.
Mullen M; Barnard A; Gavard JA; Miller C; Thomure M
Postgrad Med J; 2022 Jul; 98(1161):e12. PubMed ID: 33707292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Have We Come as Far as We Had Hoped? Discrimination in the Residency Interview.
Hessel K; DiPasco P; Kilgore L; Shelley C; Perry A; Wagner J
J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):939-945. PubMed ID: 28483440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The neurosurgery residency interview: assessing applicant perspectives on question content, utility, and stress.
Zuckerman SL; Limoges N; Yengo-Kahn AM; Graffeo CS; Chambless LB; Chitale R; Mocco J; Durham S
J Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 134(6):1974-1982. PubMed ID: 32679566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Virtual Urology Residency Match Process: Moving Beyond the Pandemic.
Carpinito GP; Khouri RK; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul A; Caldwell KM; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():33-38. PubMed ID: 34280439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.
Thurman RJ; Katz E; Carter W; Han J; Kayala E; McCoin N; Storrow AB
Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 16(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 19388912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview.
Jarman BT; Kallies KJ; Joshi ART; Smink DS; Sarosi GA; Chang L; Green JM; Greenberg JA; Melcher ML; Nfonsam V; Ramirez LD; Borgert AJ; Whiting J
J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(6):e15-e23. PubMed ID: 31175064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of virtual interviewing on applicant approach to and perspective of the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Subspecialty Fellowship Match.
Lewkowitz AK; Ramsey PS; Burrell D; Metz TD; Rhoades JS
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 May; 3(3):100326. PubMed ID: 33548511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
