These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28024254)

  • 1. Relation between temporal perception and inhibitory control in the Go/No-Go task.
    Brown SW; Perreault ST
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Feb; 173():87-93. PubMed ID: 28024254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Executive attentional resources in timing: Effects of inhibitory control and cognitive aging.
    Brown SW; Johnson TM; Sohl ME; Dumas MK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Aug; 41(4):1063-83. PubMed ID: 26010590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing and executive resources: dual-task interference patterns between temporal production and shifting, updating, and inhibition tasks.
    Brown SW; Collier SA; Night JC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):947-63. PubMed ID: 23127475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of executive control in rhythmic timing at different tempi.
    Bååth R; Tjøstheim TA; Lingonblad M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1954-1960. PubMed ID: 27301408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frozen in time: Concurrent task performance interferes with temporal shifts of attention.
    Visser TAW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 28263628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Involvement of shared resources in time judgment and sequence reasoning tasks.
    Brown SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():92-6. PubMed ID: 23680412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of a no-go Task 2 on Task 1 performance in dual - tasking: From benefits to costs.
    Janczyk M; Huestegge L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Apr; 79(3):796-806. PubMed ID: 28028775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Time perception and temporal order memory.
    Brown SW; Smith-Petersen GA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():173-80. PubMed ID: 24594383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive flexibility: A distinct element of performance impairment due to sleep deprivation.
    Honn KA; Hinson JM; Whitney P; Van Dongen HPA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 May; 126():191-197. PubMed ID: 29549968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of practice and automaticity in temporal and nontemporal dual-task performance.
    Brown SW; Bennett ED
    Psychol Res; 2002 Feb; 66(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11963281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing and executive function: bidirectional interference between concurrent temporal production and randomization tasks.
    Brown SW
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1464-71. PubMed ID: 17263071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The attenuation effect in timing: counteracting dual-task interference with time-judgment skill training.
    Brown SW
    Perception; 2008; 37(5):712-24. PubMed ID: 18605145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of cognitive load on processing efficiency and performance effectiveness in anxiety: evidence from event-related potentials and pupillary responses.
    Hepsomali P; Hadwin JA; Liversedge SP; Degno F; Garner M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):897-909. PubMed ID: 30656352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sense of time and executive functioning in children and adults.
    Carelli MG; Forman H; Mäntylä T
    Child Neuropsychol; 2008 Jul; 14(4):372-86. PubMed ID: 17852120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zooming in on the cause of the perceptual load effect in the go/no-go paradigm.
    Chen Z; Cave KR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1072-87. PubMed ID: 26820251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional resources in timing: interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks.
    Brown SW
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1118-40. PubMed ID: 9360484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost of Dual-Task Performance in Tactile Perception Is Greater for Competing Tasks of the Same Type.
    Nguyen D; Brown J; Alais D
    Perception; 2020 May; 49(5):515-538. PubMed ID: 32216523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of executive functions in human prospective interval timing.
    Ogden RS; Salominaite E; Jones LA; Fisk JE; Montgomery C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Jul; 137(3):352-8. PubMed ID: 21561595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bivalent task switching and memory load: Similar costs on reaction times, different costs on concurrent timing.
    Viau-Quesnel C; Fortin C
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):194-203. PubMed ID: 25383477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance.
    Wiemers EA; Redick TS
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 May; 71():39-58. PubMed ID: 30928898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.