165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28024742)
1. Influence of porewater sulfide on methylmercury production and partitioning in sulfate-impacted lake sediments.
Bailey LT; Mitchell CPJ; Engstrom DR; Berndt ME; Coleman Wasik JK; Johnson NW
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 580():1197-1204. PubMed ID: 28024742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methylmercury production in a chronically sulfate-impacted sub-boreal wetland.
Johnson NW; Mitchell CP; Engstrom DR; Bailey LT; Coleman Wasik JK; Berndt ME
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Jun; 18(6):725-34. PubMed ID: 27224550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Water-level fluctuations influence sediment porewater chemistry and methylmercury production in a flood-control reservoir.
Eckley CS; Luxton TP; Goetz J; McKernan J
Environ Pollut; 2017 Mar; 222():32-41. PubMed ID: 28104341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cumulative Sulfate Loads Shift Porewater to Sulfidic Conditions in Freshwater Wetland Sediment.
Johnson NW; Pastor J; Swain EB
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2019 Jun; 38(6):1231-1244. PubMed ID: 30901093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High methylmercury production under ferruginous conditions in sediments impacted by sewage treatment plant discharges.
Bravo AG; Bouchet S; Guédron S; Amouroux D; Dominik J; Zopfi J
Water Res; 2015 Sep; 80():245-55. PubMed ID: 26005785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mercury speciation and distribution in the water column and sediments between the algal type zone and the macrophytic type zone in a hypereutrophic lake (Dianchi Lake) in Southwestern China.
Wang S; Zhang M; Li B; Xing D; Wang X; Wei C; Jia Y
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 417-418():204-13. PubMed ID: 22265601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Geochemical controls on the distribution of total mercury and methylmercury in sediments and porewater from the Yangtze River Estuary to the East China Sea.
Cao F; Yang S; Yin D; Wang R
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 892():164737. PubMed ID: 37301398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of acid mine drainage on the methylmercury cycling at the sediment-water interface in Aha Reservoir, Guizhou, China.
He T; Zhu Y; Yin D; Luo G; An Y; Yan H; Qian X
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(7):5124-38. PubMed ID: 25483970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of salinity on mercury methylating benthic microbes and their activities in Great Salt Lake, Utah.
Boyd ES; Yu RQ; Barkay T; Hamilton TL; Baxter BK; Naftz DL; Marvin-DiPasquale M
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Mar; 581-582():495-506. PubMed ID: 28057343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sediment and porewater profiles and fluxes of mercury and methylmercury in a small seepage lake in northern Minnesota.
Hines NA; Brezonik PL; Engstrom DR
Environ Sci Technol; 2004 Dec; 38(24):6610-7. PubMed ID: 15669319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Horizontal and vertical variability of mercury species in pore water and sediments in small lakes in Ontario.
He T; Lu J; Yang F; Feng X
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Nov; 386(1-3):53-64. PubMed ID: 17720225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Manganese(iv) oxide amendments reduce methylmercury concentrations in sediment porewater.
Vlassopoulos D; Kanematsu M; Henry EA; Goin J; Leven A; Glaser D; Brown SS; O'Day PA
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Dec; 20(12):1746-1760. PubMed ID: 30393799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of biochars and activated carbons for in situ remediation of sediments impacted with organics, mercury, and methylmercury.
Gomez-Eyles JL; Yupanqui C; Beckingham B; Riedel G; Gilmour C; Ghosh U
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Dec; 47(23):13721-9. PubMed ID: 24168448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Methylmercury cycling in High Arctic wetland ponds: controls on sedimentary production.
Lehnherr I; St Louis VL; Kirk JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(19):10523-31. PubMed ID: 22799567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methylmercury production in sediment from agricultural and non-agricultural wetlands in the Yolo Bypass, California, USA.
Marvin-DiPasquale M; Windham-Myers L; Agee JL; Kakouros E; Kieu le H; Fleck JA; Alpers CN; Stricker CA
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Jun; 484():288-99. PubMed ID: 24188689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Importance of dissolved neutral mercury sulfides for methyl mercury production in contaminated sediments.
Drott A; Lambertsson L; Björn E; Skyllberg U
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2270-6. PubMed ID: 17438774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3).
Benoit JM; Gilmour CC; Mason RP
Environ Sci Technol; 2001 Jan; 35(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 11351996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mercury methylation in high and low-sulphate impacted wetland ponds within the prairie pothole region of North America.
Hoggarth CG; Hall BD; Mitchell CP
Environ Pollut; 2015 Oct; 205():269-77. PubMed ID: 26099458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wetlands as principal zones of methylmercury production in southern Louisiana and the Gulf of Mexico region.
Hall BD; Aiken GR; Krabbenhoft DP; Marvin-Dipasquale M; Swarzenski CM
Environ Pollut; 2008 Jul; 154(1):124-34. PubMed ID: 18242808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mercury methylation and methylmercury demethylation in boreal lake sediment with legacy sulphate pollution.
Huang H; Mangal V; Rennie MD; Tong H; Simpson MJ; Mitchell CPJ
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2022 Jun; 24(6):932-944. PubMed ID: 35532885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
