These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28024756)

  • 1. Tools to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews of nursing intervention in China: Global implications of the findings.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Cao X; Shields L
    Nurs Outlook; 2017; 65(4):380-391. PubMed ID: 28024756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk of bias tool in systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture in Chinese journals.
    Liu Y; Yang S; Dai J; Xu Y; Zhang R; Jiang H; Yan X; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28130. PubMed ID: 22174772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Ma B; Qi GQ; Lin XT; Wang T; Chen ZM; Yang KH
    J Altern Complement Med; 2012 Sep; 18(9):813-7. PubMed ID: 22924413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemiology, quality and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Ma B; Guo J; Qi G; Li H; Peng J; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Yang K
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(5):e20185. PubMed ID: 21633698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
    Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of reporting of systematic reviews published in "evidence-based" Chinese journals.
    Li JL; Ge L; Ma JC; Zeng QL; Yao L; An N; Ding JX; Gan YH; Tian JH
    Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 3():58. PubMed ID: 24906805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of methodological tools for assessing the quality of studies in periodontology and implant dentistry: a systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Huda F; Wasiak J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jun; 41(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 24666018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use and reporting of risk of bias tools in 825 systematic reviews of acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
    Long Y; Wang X; Xiao W; Chen R; Guo Q; Liu J; Shao R; Huang J; Du L
    Acupunct Med; 2021 Aug; 39(4):318-326. PubMed ID: 32811166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of quality assessment tools in systematic reviews was varied and inconsistent.
    Seehra J; Pandis N; Koletsi D; Fleming PS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 69():179-84.e5. PubMed ID: 26151664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Yang M; Jiang L; Wang A; Xu G
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 28004476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews or meta-analyses in nursing field in China.
    Jin YH; Ma ET; Gao WJ; Hua W; Dou HY
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Feb; 20(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 24580977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reporting Characteristics and Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture Analgesia.
    Li X; Wang R; Shi X; Su J; Pan Y; Tian J; Yang K
    Pain Pract; 2017 Nov; 17(8):1066-1074. PubMed ID: 28083991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological tools and sensitivity analysis for assessing quality or risk of bias used in systematic reviews published in the high-impact anesthesiology journals.
    Marušić MF; Fidahić M; Cepeha CM; Farcaș LG; Tseke A; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):121. PubMed ID: 32423382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews published in the urological literature from 1998 to 2008.
    MacDonald SL; Canfield SE; Fesperman SF; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2010 Aug; 184(2):648-53. PubMed ID: 20639030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Publication of reviews synthesizing child health evidence (PORSCHE): a survey of authors to identify factors associated with publication in Cochrane and non-Cochrane sources.
    Hartling L; Shave K; Thomson D; Fernandes RM; Wingert A; Williams K
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; 5(1):104. PubMed ID: 27328935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological quality evaluation of systematic reviews or meta-analyses on ERCC1 in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.
    Tao H; Zhang Y; Li Q; Chen J
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2245-2256. PubMed ID: 28875225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.