These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28025063)

  • 1. Was it me? - Filling the interval between action and effects increases agency but not sensory attenuation.
    Weller L; Schwarz KA; Kunde W; Pfister R
    Biol Psychol; 2017 Feb; 123():241-249. PubMed ID: 28025063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensory suppression of brain responses to self-generated sounds is observed with and without the perception of agency.
    Timm J; Schönwiesner M; Schröger E; SanMiguel I
    Cortex; 2016 Jul; 80():5-20. PubMed ID: 27137101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cerebellar contribution to the prediction of self-initiated sounds.
    Knolle F; Schröger E; Kotz SA
    Cortex; 2013 Oct; 49(9):2449-61. PubMed ID: 23318086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensation of agency and perception of temporal order.
    Timm J; Schönwiesner M; SanMiguel I; Schröger E
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jan; 23():42-52. PubMed ID: 24362412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP correlates of processing the auditory consequences of own versus observed actions.
    Ghio M; Scharmach K; Bellebaum C
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jun; 55(6):e13048. PubMed ID: 29266338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological alterations in motor-auditory predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder.
    van Laarhoven T; Stekelenburg JJ; Eussen MLJM; Vroomen J
    Autism Res; 2019 Apr; 12(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 30801964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Whodunnit? Electrophysiological correlates of agency judgements.
    Kühn S; Nenchev I; Haggard P; Brass M; Gallinat J; Voss M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28657. PubMed ID: 22194878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attenuation of auditory evoked potentials for hand and eye-initiated sounds.
    Mifsud NG; Beesley T; Watson TL; Whitford TJ
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Oct; 120():61-68. PubMed ID: 27592269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vicarious action preparation does not result in sensory attenuation of auditory action effects.
    Weiss C; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Dec; 21(4):1654-61. PubMed ID: 23069246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sensory Attenuation of the Auditory P2 Differentiates Self- from Partner-Produced Sounds during Joint Action.
    Bolt NK; Loehr JD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Oct; 33(11):2297-2310. PubMed ID: 34272962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The self in action effects: selective attenuation of self-generated sounds.
    Weiss C; Herwig A; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Cognition; 2011 Nov; 121(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 21784422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensory attenuation of self-initiated sounds maps onto habitual associations between motor action and sound.
    Mifsud NG; Whitford TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():38-43. PubMed ID: 28720523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study.
    Baess P; Horváth J; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Sep; 48(9):1276-83. PubMed ID: 21449953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Action-related auditory ERP attenuation is not modulated by action effect relevance.
    Neszmélyi B; Horváth J
    Biol Psychol; 2021 Apr; 161():108029. PubMed ID: 33556451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP correlates of action effect prediction and visual sensory attenuation in voluntary action.
    Hughes G; Waszak F
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1632-40. PubMed ID: 21352924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation.
    Bäss P; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 18627782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP and behavioral evidence of increased sensory attenuation for fear-related action outcomes.
    Hughes G
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Oct; 111():8-13. PubMed ID: 26253867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suppression of the N1 auditory evoked potential for sounds generated by the upper and lower limbs.
    van Elk M; Salomon R; Kannape O; Blanke O
    Biol Psychol; 2014 Oct; 102():108-17. PubMed ID: 25019590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reliability of sensory predictions determines the experience of self-agency.
    Gentsch A; Kathmann N; Schütz-Bosbach S
    Behav Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 228(2):415-22. PubMed ID: 22212711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consequences matter: Self-induced tones are used as feedback to optimize tone-eliciting actions.
    Neszmélyi B; Horváth J
    Psychophysiology; 2017 Jun; 54(6):904-915. PubMed ID: 28240775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.