334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28025179)
1. Measuring the diversity of the human microbiota with targeted next-generation sequencing.
Finotello F; Mastrorilli E; Di Camillo B
Brief Bioinform; 2018 Jul; 19(4):679-692. PubMed ID: 28025179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different next generation sequencing platforms produce different microbial profiles and diversity in cystic fibrosis sputum.
Hahn A; Sanyal A; Perez GF; Colberg-Poley AM; Campos J; Rose MC; Pérez-Losada M
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():95-99. PubMed ID: 27609714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimisation of methods for bacterial skin microbiome investigation: primer selection and comparison of the 454 versus MiSeq platform.
Castelino M; Eyre S; Moat J; Fox G; Martin P; Ho P; Upton M; Barton A
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28109256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-throughput qPCR and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing as complementary methods for the investigation of the cheese microbiota.
Dreier M; Meola M; Berthoud H; Shani N; Wechsler D; Junier P
BMC Microbiol; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35130830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Large-scale benchmarking reveals false discoveries and count transformation sensitivity in 16S rRNA gene amplicon data analysis methods used in microbiome studies.
Thorsen J; Brejnrod A; Mortensen M; Rasmussen MA; Stokholm J; Al-Soud WA; Sørensen S; Bisgaard H; Waage J
Microbiome; 2016 Nov; 4(1):62. PubMed ID: 27884206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Processing a 16S rRNA Sequencing Dataset with the Microbiome Helper Workflow.
Douglas GM; Comeau AM; Langille MGI
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1849():131-141. PubMed ID: 30298252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deciphering intra-species bacterial diversity of meat and seafood spoilage microbiota using gyrB amplicon sequencing: A comparative analysis with 16S rDNA V3-V4 amplicon sequencing.
Poirier S; Rué O; Peguilhan R; Coeuret G; Zagorec M; Champomier-Vergès MC; Loux V; Chaillou S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0204629. PubMed ID: 30252901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of sequencing platforms and bioinformatics pipelines for compositional analysis of the gut microbiome.
Allali I; Arnold JW; Roach J; Cadenas MB; Butz N; Hassan HM; Koci M; Ballou A; Mendoza M; Ali R; Azcarate-Peril MA
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):194. PubMed ID: 28903732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High-resolution ISR amplicon sequencing reveals personalized oral microbiome.
Mukherjee C; Beall CJ; Griffen AL; Leys EJ
Microbiome; 2018 Sep; 6(1):153. PubMed ID: 30185233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution microbiome analysis enabled by linking of 16S rRNA gene sequences with adjacent genomic contexts.
Kapustina Ž; Medžiūnė J; Alzbutas G; Rokaitis I; Matjošaitis K; Mackevičius G; Žeimytė S; Karpus L; Lubys A
Microb Genom; 2021 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 34473015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species classifier choice is a key consideration when analysing low-complexity food microbiome data.
Walsh AM; Crispie F; O'Sullivan O; Finnegan L; Claesson MJ; Cotter PD
Microbiome; 2018 Mar; 6(1):50. PubMed ID: 29554948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diversity of microbiota associated with symptomatic and non-symptomatic bacterial wilt-diseased banana plants determined using 16S rRNA metagenome sequencing.
Suhaimi NSM; Goh SY; Ajam N; Othman RY; Chan KG; Thong KL
World J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 33(9):168. PubMed ID: 28828756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Generating amplicon reads for microbial community assessment with next-generation sequencing.
Gołębiewski M; Tretyn A
J Appl Microbiol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):330-354. PubMed ID: 31299126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive evaluation of the sl1p pipeline for 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis.
Whelan FJ; Surette MG
Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):100. PubMed ID: 28807046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Microbiota Analysis Using an Illumina MiSeq Platform to Sequence 16S rRNA Genes.
Rapin A; Pattaroni C; Marsland BJ; Harris NL
Curr Protoc Mouse Biol; 2017 Jun; 7(2):100-129. PubMed ID: 28628218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data analysis for 16S microbial profiling from different benchtop sequencing platforms.
Pylro VS; Roesch LF; Morais DK; Clark IM; Hirsch PR; Tótola MR
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Dec; 107():30-7. PubMed ID: 25193439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and evaluation of a culture-free microbiota profiling platform (MYcrobiota) for clinical diagnostics.
Boers SA; Hiltemann SD; Stubbs AP; Jansen R; Hays JP
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2018 Jun; 37(6):1081-1089. PubMed ID: 29549470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An accurate and efficient experimental approach for characterization of the complex oral microbiota.
Zheng W; Tsompana M; Ruscitto A; Sharma A; Genco R; Sun Y; Buck MJ
Microbiome; 2015 Oct; 3():48. PubMed ID: 26437933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Profiling the Gastrointestinal Microbiota.
Posteraro B; De Maio F; Gasbarrini A
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2283():83-92. PubMed ID: 33765312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PCR-based quantification of taxa-specific abundances in microbial communities: Quantifying and avoiding common pitfalls.
Bonk F; Popp D; Harms H; Centler F
J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Oct; 153():139-147. PubMed ID: 30267718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
