These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28025191)

  • 21. Fractional flow reserve vs. angiography in guiding management to optimize outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation FAMOUS-NSTEMI randomized trial.
    Layland J; Oldroyd KG; Curzen N; Sood A; Balachandran K; Das R; Junejo S; Ahmed N; Lee MM; Shaukat A; O'Donnell A; Nam J; Briggs A; Henderson R; McConnachie A; Berry C;
    Eur Heart J; 2015 Jan; 36(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 25179764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Toth G; De Bruyne B; Casselman F; De Vroey F; Pyxaras S; Di Serafino L; Van Praet F; Van Mieghem C; Stockman B; Wijns W; Degrieck I; Barbato E
    Circulation; 2013 Sep; 128(13):1405-11. PubMed ID: 23985788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stable coronary artery disease: revascularisation and invasive strategies.
    Piccolo R; Giustino G; Mehran R; Windecker S
    Lancet; 2015 Aug; 386(9994):702-13. PubMed ID: 26334162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Therapeutic Decision Making.
    Tesche C; Vliegenthart R; Duguay TM; De Cecco CN; Albrecht MH; De Santis D; Langenbach MC; Varga-Szemes A; Jacobs BE; Jochheim D; Baquet M; Bayer RR; Litwin SE; Hoffmann E; Steinberg DH; Schoepf UJ
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 120(12):2121-2127. PubMed ID: 29102036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve on Management Decision and 1-Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: PRIME-FFR (Insights From the POST-IT [Portuguese Study on the Evaluation of FFR-Guided Treatment of Coronary Disease] and R3F [French FFR Registry] Integrated Multicenter Registries - Implementation of FFR [Fractional Flow Reserve] in Routine Practice).
    Van Belle E; Baptista SB; Raposo L; Henderson J; Rioufol G; Santos L; Pouillot C; Ramos R; Cuisset T; Calé R; Teiger E; Jorge E; Belle L; Machado C; Barreau D; Costa M; Hanssen M; Oliveira E; Besnard C; Costa J; Dallongeville J; Pipa J; Sideris G; Fonseca N; Bretelle C; Guardado J; Lhoest N; Silva B; Barnay P; Sousa MJ; Leborgne L; Silva JC; Vincent F; Rodrigues A; Seca L; Fernandes R; Dupouy P;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28615234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. FFR-guided versus coronary angiogram-guided CABG: A review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.
    Timbadia D; Ler A; Sazzad F; Alexiou C; Kofidis T
    J Card Surg; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2785-2793. PubMed ID: 32697006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Outcomes of coronary stenoses deferred revascularization for borderline versus nonborderline fractional flow reserve values.
    Depta JP; Patel JS; Novak E; Masrani SK; Raymer D; Facey G; Patel Y; Zajarias A; Lasala JM; Singh J; Bach RG; Kurz HI
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1788-93. PubMed ID: 24837255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Health-Related Quality of Life and Angina in Fractional Flow Reserve- Versus Angiography-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: FARGO Trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization).
    Thuesen AL; Riber LP; Veien KT; Christiansen EH; Jensen SE; Modrau I; Andreasen JJ; Borregaard B; Junker A; Mortensen PE; Jensen LO
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2021 Jun; 14(6):e007302. PubMed ID: 34078097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization in Patients With Aortic Stenosis.
    Di Gioia G; Pellicano M; Toth GG; Casselman F; Adjedj J; Van Praet F; Ferrara A; Stockman B; Degrieck I; Bartunek J; Trimarco B; Wijns W; De Bruyne B; Barbato E
    Am J Cardiol; 2016 May; 117(9):1511-5. PubMed ID: 26976789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided treatment in patients with angiographically equivocal left main coronary artery stenosis.
    Hamilos M; Muller O; Cuisset T; Ntalianis A; Chlouverakis G; Sarno G; Nelis O; Bartunek J; Vanderheyden M; Wyffels E; Barbato E; Heyndrickx GR; Wijns W; De Bruyne B
    Circulation; 2009 Oct; 120(15):1505-12. PubMed ID: 19786633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of measuring fractional flow reserve on decision-making in the cath lab in a cohort of patients being considered for coronary revascularization.
    Lockie T; Perera D; De Silva K; Webb I; Pattinson S; Redwood S
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Sep; 22(9):413-6. PubMed ID: 20814047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The role of fractional flow reserve to guide stent implantation.
    Mangiacapra F; Di Serafino L; Barbato E
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2011 Feb; 59(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 21285930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Should functional assessment of lesion severity be used to guide coronary bypass?
    Yanagawa B; Verma S; Bagai A; Puskas JD
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2018 Sep; 33(5):565-570. PubMed ID: 29994809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Percutaneous Cornary Intervention for Patients with Angina Pectoris.
    Shinohara H; Kodera S; Kiyosue A; Ando J; Morita H; Komuro I
    Int Heart J; 2020 Nov; 61(6):1097-1106. PubMed ID: 33191337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Functional assessment of coronary stenoses: can we live without it?
    Pijls NH; Tanaka N; Fearon WF
    Eur Heart J; 2013 May; 34(18):1335-44. PubMed ID: 23257950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio for the physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis in the catheterization laboratory: Practical tips].
    Picard F; Tadros VX; Pighi M; Spagnoli V; De Hemptinne Q; Ly HQ
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2017 Feb; 66(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 27211352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) as a guide to treat coronary artery disease.
    Mangiacapra F; Bressi E; Sticchi A; Morisco C; Barbato E
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2018 Jul; 16(7):465-477. PubMed ID: 29923434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing the adverse clinical outcomes associated with fraction flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Bundhun PK; Yanamala CM; Huang F
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Dec; 16(1):249. PubMed ID: 27912739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of Routine Invasive Physiology at Time of Angiography in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease on Reclassification of Revascularization Strategy: Results From the DEFINE REAL Study.
    Van Belle E; Gil R; Klauss V; Balghith M; Meuwissen M; Clerc J; Witzenbichler B; Cercek M; Vlachojannis M; Lang I; Commeau P; Vincent F; Testa L; Wasek W; Debry N; Kische S; Gabrielli G; Sardella G
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 11(4):354-365. PubMed ID: 29471949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.
    Naqvi SY; Klein J; Saha T; McCormick DJ; Goldberg S
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Feb; 119(4):520-527. PubMed ID: 28012553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.