These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28025312)

  • 21. The new St Jude Trifecta versus Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna and Magna Ease aortic bioprosthesis: is there a hemodynamic superiority?
    Wendt D; Thielmann M; Plicht B; Aßmann J; Price V; Neuhäuser M; Jakob H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 May; 147(5):1553-60. PubMed ID: 23870159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rigorous patient-prosthesis matching of Perimount Magna aortic bioprosthesis.
    Nakamura H; Yamaguchi H; Takagaki M; Kadowaki T; Nakao T; Amano A
    Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2015 Mar; 23(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 25033914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hemodynamic performance of the St. Jude Medical Epic Supra aortic stented valve.
    Maitland A; Hirsch GM; Pascoe EA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 May; 20(3):327-31. PubMed ID: 21714425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Aortic valve replacement with sutureless prosthesis: better than root enlargement to avoid patient-prosthesis mismatch?
    Beckmann E; Martens A; Alhadi F; Hoeffler K; Umminger J; Kaufeld T; Sarikouch S; Koigeldiev N; Cebotari S; Schmitto JD; Haverich A; Shrestha M
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 22(6):744-9. PubMed ID: 26920726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Early in-vivo hemodynamic comparison of supra-annular aortic bioprostheses: Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease.
    Modi A; Pousios D; Sadeque S; Velissaris T; Barlow C; Livesey S; Tsang GM; Ohri SK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 25296457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Freedom SOLO valve for aortic valve replacement: clinical and hemodynamic results from a prospective multicenter trial.
    Beholz S; Repossini A; Livi U; Schepens M; El Gabry M; Matschke K; Trivedi U; Eckel L; Dapunt O; Zamorano JL
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 Jan; 19(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 20329497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of Aortic Annulus Dimension After Aortic Valve Neocuspidization With Valve Replacement and Normal Valve.
    Yamamoto Y; Iino K; Shintani Y; Kato H; Kimura K; Watanabe G; Takemura H
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Summer; 29(2):143-149. PubMed ID: 28823320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemodynamic performance and clinical consequences of aortic valve replacement with 21-mm sized pericardial bioprostheses.
    Boeken U; Litmathe J; Kurt M; Feindt P; Gams E
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 53(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 16208613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Aortic valve replacement with new-generation stentless pericardial valves: short-term clinical and hemodynamic results.
    Grubitzsch H; Linneweber J; Kossagk C; Sanli E; Beholz S; Konertz WF
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):623-9. PubMed ID: 16245501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Aortic valve reconstruction with use of pericardial leaflets in adults with bicuspid aortic valve disease: early and midterm outcomes.
    Song MG; Yang HS; Choi JB; Shin JK; Chee HK; Kim JS
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2014 Dec; 41(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 25593520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Haemodynamic performance of the small supra-annular Trifecta bioprosthesis: results from a French multicentre study.
    Fouquet O; Flecher E; Nzomvuama A; Remadi JP; Bière L; Donal E; Levy F; Dalmayrac E; Szymanski C; Leguerrier A; Tribouilloy C
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Apr; 22(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 27002012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement.
    Andreas M; Wallner S; Ruetzler K; Wiedemann D; Ehrlich M; Heinze G; Binder T; Moritz A; Hiesmayr MJ; Kocher A; Laufer G
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 48(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 25527170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical results of the Medtronic Mosaic porcine bioprosthesis up to 13 years.
    Riess FC; Cramer E; Hansen L; Schiffelers S; Wahl G; Wallrath J; Winkel S; Kremer P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jan; 37(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 19695889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Early Hemodynamic Performance of the Crown PRT Aortic Prosthesis: A Prospective Study.
    Duggan SM; Sadeque S; Karamanou D; Salhiyyah K; Giritharan S; Pousios D; Miskolczi S; Barlow CW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2018 Jan; 27(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 30560604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Late outcomes for aortic valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: up to 17-year follow-up in 1,000 patients.
    McClure RS; Narayanasamy N; Wiegerinck E; Lipsitz S; Maloney A; Byrne JG; Aranki SF; Couper GS; Cohn LH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1410-6. PubMed ID: 20417753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ten-year comparison of pericardial tissue valves versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age.
    Weber A; Noureddine H; Englberger L; Dick F; Gahl B; Aymard T; Czerny M; Tevaearai H; Stalder M; Carrel TP
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Nov; 144(5):1075-83. PubMed ID: 22341653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of 17-mm St. Jude Medical Regent prosthetic aortic heart valves by rest and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
    Minardi G; Manzara C; Creazzo V; Maselli D; Casali G; Pulignano G; Musumeci F
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 1():27. PubMed ID: 16984626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of patient-prosthesis mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in degenerated bioprostheses.
    Seiffert M; Conradi L; Baldus S; Knap M; Schirmer J; Franzen O; Koschyk D; Meinertz T; Reichenspurner H; Treede H
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 143(3):617-24. PubMed ID: 22169448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.