397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28025654)
1. Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT.
Leng S; Takahashi N; Gomez Cardona D; Kitajima K; McCollough B; Li Z; Kawashima A; Leibovich BC; McCollough CH
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 May; 42(5):1485-1492. PubMed ID: 28025654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at biphasic helical CT.
Kim JK; Park SY; Shon JH; Cho KS
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):677-84. PubMed ID: 14990834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Quantitative CT Texture Analysis be Used to Differentiate Fat-poor Renal Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma on Unenhanced CT Images?
Hodgdon T; McInnes MD; Schieda N; Flood TA; Lamb L; Thornhill RE
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):787-96. PubMed ID: 25906183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Histogram analysis of small solid renal masses: differentiating minimal fat angiomyolipoma from renal cell carcinoma.
Chaudhry HS; Davenport MS; Nieman CM; Ho LM; Neville AM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Feb; 198(2):377-83. PubMed ID: 22268181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does Computer-Aided Diagnosis Permit Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma on MDCT?
Lee Y; Kim JK; Shim W; Sung YS; Cho KS; Shin JH; Kim MH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):W305-12. PubMed ID: 26295666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: differentiation of morphological and enhancement features from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Sung CK; Kim SH; Woo S; Moon MH; Kim SY; Kim SH; Cho JY
Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1114-22. PubMed ID: 26663389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differentiation of clear from non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma using CT washout formula.
Kopp RP; Aganovic L; Palazzi KL; Cassidy FH; Sakamoto K; Derweesh IH
Can J Urol; 2013 Jun; 20(3):6790-7. PubMed ID: 23783049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fat poor angiomyolipoma differentiation from renal cell carcinoma at 320-slice dynamic volume CT perfusion.
Chen C; Kang Q; Xu B; Shi Z; Guo H; Wei Q; Lu Y; Wu X
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 May; 43(5):1223-1230. PubMed ID: 28828638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative computer-aided diagnostic algorithm for automated detection of peak lesion attenuation in differentiating clear cell from papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, oncocytoma, and fat-poor angiomyolipoma on multiphasic multidetector computed tomography.
Coy H; Young JR; Douek ML; Brown MS; Sayre J; Raman SS
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jul; 42(7):1919-1928. PubMed ID: 28280876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circularity Index on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Helps Distinguish Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma: Retrospective Analyses of Histologically Proven 257 Small Renal Tumors Less Than 4 cm.
Kang HS; Park JJ
Korean J Radiol; 2021 May; 22(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 33660463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subtype Differentiation of Small (≤ 4 cm) Solid Renal Mass Using Volumetric Histogram Analysis of DWI at 3-T MRI.
Li A; Xing W; Li H; Hu Y; Hu D; Li Z; Kamel IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Sep; 211(3):614-623. PubMed ID: 29812980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Iodine Concentration in the Lipid-Poor Portion of the Renal Mass for Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma from Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Sun J; Zhang XY; Li XT; Li YL; Wang ZL
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2019 May; 34(4):224-230. PubMed ID: 31070481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Small (< 4 cm) Renal Mass: Differentiation of Oncocytoma From Renal Cell Carcinoma on Biphasic Contrast-Enhanced CT.
Sasaguri K; Takahashi N; Gomez-Cardona D; Leng S; Schmit GD; Carter RE; Leibovich BC; Kawashima A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Nov; 205(5):999-1007. PubMed ID: 26496547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are there useful CT features to differentiate renal cell carcinoma from lipid-poor renal angiomyolipoma?
Yang CW; Shen SH; Chang YH; Chung HJ; Wang JH; Lin AT; Chen KK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 24147472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MRI evaluation of small (<4cm) solid renal masses: multivariate modeling improves diagnostic accuracy for angiomyolipoma without visible fat compared to univariate analysis.
Schieda N; Dilauro M; Moosavi B; Hodgdon T; Cron GO; McInnes MD; Flood TA
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):2242-51. PubMed ID: 26486936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The independent indicators for differentiating renal cell carcinoma from renal angiomyolipoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Cao H; Fang L; Chen L; Zhan J; Diao X; Liu Y; Lu C; Zhang Z; Chen Y
BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Mar; 20(1):32. PubMed ID: 32228606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differentiation of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes and Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma by Use of Quantitative Enhancement Measurement During Three-Phase MDCT.
Kim SH; Kim CS; Kim MJ; Cho JY; Cho SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jan; 206(1):W21-8. PubMed ID: 26700359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma subtypes and angiomyolipoma.
Li CX; Lu Q; Huang BJ; Xue LY; Yan LX; Zheng FY; Wen JX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Apr; 85(4):795-802. PubMed ID: 26971426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiation of fat-poor angiomyolipoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced MDCT images using quantitative feature classification.
Lee HS; Hong H; Jung DC; Park S; Kim J
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3604-3614. PubMed ID: 28376281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CT histogram analysis: differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from renal cell carcinoma at CT imaging.
Kim JY; Kim JK; Kim N; Cho KS
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):472-9. PubMed ID: 18094264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
