BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28025930)

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
    Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Hind D; Tappenden P; Tumur I; Eggington S; Sutcliffe P; Ryan A
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 May; 12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. PubMed ID: 18462574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable
    Wong WWL; Zargar M; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Riesco-Martínez M; Chan KKW
    Curr Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(5):e597-e609. PubMed ID: 31708653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aflibercept in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Based Therapy (FOLFIRI) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Which has Progressed Following Prior Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: a Critique of the Evidence.
    Wade R; Duarte A; Simmonds M; Rodriguez-Lopez R; Duffy S; Woolacott N; Spackman E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 May; 33(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 25616671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
    Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimens compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin alone among US elderly stage IV colon cancer patients.
    Mullins CD; Hsiao FY; Onukwugha E; Pandya NB; Hanna N
    Cancer; 2012 Jun; 118(12):3173-81. PubMed ID: 22020739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost-effectiveness of different chemotherapy strategies for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS).
    Manca A; Asseburg C; Bravo Vergel Y; Seymour MT; Meade A; Stephens R; Parmar M; Sculpher MJ
    Value Health; 2012 Jan; 15(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 22264968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of Capecitabine + Irinotecan Versus Leucovorin + Fluorouracil + Irinotecan in the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in China.
    Wu Q; Zhang P; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Li Q
    Clin Ther; 2020 Nov; 42(11):2148-2158.e2. PubMed ID: 32981743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Sequences of the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Wild-Type KRAS Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Riesco-Martínez MC; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Mittmann N; Giotis A; Lien K; Wong WW; Chan KK
    J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jun; 12(6):e710-23. PubMed ID: 27143148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
    Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
    Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept and Ramucirumab in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-based Therapy for the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan.
    Kashiwa M; Matsushita R
    Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1361-1375. PubMed ID: 32616433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Value of Current Therapies.
    Goldstein DA; Zeichner SB; Bartnik CM; Neustadter E; Flowers CR
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Mar; 15(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26541320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.