These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28025930)

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
    Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Hind D; Tappenden P; Tumur I; Eggington S; Sutcliffe P; Ryan A
    Health Technol Assess; 2008 May; 12(15):iii-ix, xi-162. PubMed ID: 18462574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable
    Wong WWL; Zargar M; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Riesco-Martínez M; Chan KKW
    Curr Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(5):e597-e609. PubMed ID: 31708653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Aflibercept in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-Based Therapy (FOLFIRI) for the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Which has Progressed Following Prior Oxaliplatin-Based Chemotherapy: a Critique of the Evidence.
    Wade R; Duarte A; Simmonds M; Rodriguez-Lopez R; Duffy S; Woolacott N; Spackman E
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 May; 33(5):457-66. PubMed ID: 25616671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
    Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
    Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Tappenden P; Jones R; Paisley S; Carroll C
    Health Technol Assess; 2007 Mar; 11(12):1-128, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 17346499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimens compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin alone among US elderly stage IV colon cancer patients.
    Mullins CD; Hsiao FY; Onukwugha E; Pandya NB; Hanna N
    Cancer; 2012 Jun; 118(12):3173-81. PubMed ID: 22020739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cost-effectiveness of different chemotherapy strategies for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS).
    Manca A; Asseburg C; Bravo Vergel Y; Seymour MT; Meade A; Stephens R; Parmar M; Sculpher MJ
    Value Health; 2012 Jan; 15(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 22264968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of Capecitabine + Irinotecan Versus Leucovorin + Fluorouracil + Irinotecan in the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in China.
    Wu Q; Zhang P; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Li Q
    Clin Ther; 2020 Nov; 42(11):2148-2158.e2. PubMed ID: 32981743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
    J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Different Sequences of the Use of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors for Wild-Type KRAS Unresectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Riesco-Martínez MC; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Mittmann N; Giotis A; Lien K; Wong WW; Chan KK
    J Oncol Pract; 2016 Jun; 12(6):e710-23. PubMed ID: 27143148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
    Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
    J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis in the Spanish setting of the PEAK trial of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Rivera F; Valladares M; Gea S; López-Martínez N
    J Med Econ; 2017 Jun; 20(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 28107090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line FOLFIRI Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab in Patients With RAS Wild-Type Left-Sided Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Han J; Xiao D; Tan C; Zeng X; Hu H; Zeng S; Jiang Q; She L; Yao L; Li L; Tang L; Ma J; Huang J; Shen L
    Cancer Control; 2020; 27(1):1073274820902271. PubMed ID: 32107929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept and Ramucirumab in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-based Therapy for the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan.
    Kashiwa M; Matsushita R
    Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1361-1375. PubMed ID: 32616433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Value of Current Therapies.
    Goldstein DA; Zeichner SB; Bartnik CM; Neustadter E; Flowers CR
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Mar; 15(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 26541320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
    Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.