BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28026709)

  • 1. Misclassification errors from postal code-based geocoding to assign census geography in Nova Scotia, Canada.
    Terashima M; Kephart G
    Can J Public Health; 2016 Dec; 107(4-5):e424-e430. PubMed ID: 28026709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of matching residential postal codes to census geography.
    Pinault L; Khan S; Tjepkema M
    Health Rep; 2020 Jun; 31(3):3-13. PubMed ID: 32644759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positional accuracy of geocoding from residential postal codes versus full street addresses.
    Khan S; Pinault L; Tjepkema M; Wilkins R
    Health Rep; 2018 Feb; 29(2):3-9. PubMed ID: 29465738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geocoding rural addresses in a community contaminated by PFOA: a comparison of methods.
    Vieira VM; Howard GJ; Gallagher LG; Fletcher T
    Environ Health; 2010 Apr; 9():18. PubMed ID: 20406495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing a single-stage geocoding method to a multi-stage geocoding method: how much and where do they disagree?
    Lovasi GS; Weiss JC; Hoskins R; Whitsel EA; Rice K; Erickson CF; Psaty BM
    Int J Health Geogr; 2007 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 17367520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Geocoding Error, Spatial Uncertainty, and Implications for Exposure Assessment and Environmental Epidemiology.
    Kinnee EJ; Tripathy S; Schinasi L; Shmool JLC; Sheffield PE; Holguin F; Clougherty JE
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Aug; 17(16):. PubMed ID: 32806682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of two geocoding methods for geographic information system-based exposure assessment in epidemiological studies.
    Faure E; Danjou AM; Clavel-Chapelon F; Boutron-Ruault MC; Dossus L; Fervers B
    Environ Health; 2017 Feb; 16(1):15. PubMed ID: 28235407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the positional difference between two common geocoding methods.
    Duncan DT; Castro MC; Blossom JC; Bennett GG; Gortmaker SL
    Geospat Health; 2011 May; 5(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 21590677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining palliative care program use and place of death in rural and urban contexts: a Canadian population-based study using linked data.
    Lavergne MR; Lethbridge L; Johnston G; Henderson D; D'Intino AF; McIntyre P
    Rural Remote Health; 2015; 15(2):3134. PubMed ID: 26103433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positional accuracy of two methods of geocoding.
    Ward MH; Nuckols JR; Giglierano J; Bonner MR; Wolter C; Airola M; Mix W; Colt JS; Hartge P
    Epidemiology; 2005 Jul; 16(4):542-7. PubMed ID: 15951673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating the accuracy of geographical imputation.
    Henry KA; Boscoe FP
    Int J Health Geogr; 2008 Jan; 7():3. PubMed ID: 18215308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The accuracy of address coding and the effects of coding errors.
    Kravets N; Hadden WC
    Health Place; 2007 Mar; 13(1):293-8. PubMed ID: 16162420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantifying the magnitude of environmental exposure misclassification when using imprecise address proxies in public health research.
    Healy MA; Gilliland JA
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2012 Apr; 3(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 22469491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterizing the neighborhood risk environment in multisite clinic-based cohort studies: A practical geocoding and data linkages protocol for protected health information.
    Nassel A; Wilson-Barthes MG; Howe CJ; Napravnik S; Mugavero MJ; Agil D; Dulin AJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278672. PubMed ID: 36580446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geocoding addresses from a large population-based study: lessons learned.
    McElroy JA; Remington PL; Trentham-Dietz A; Robert SA; Newcomb PA
    Epidemiology; 2003 Jul; 14(4):399-407. PubMed ID: 12843762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improved Geocoding of Cancer Registry Addresses in Urban and Rural Oklahoma.
    Dilekli N; Janitz A; Campbell J
    J Registry Manag; 2020; 47(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 32833379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial Hotspots and Sociodemographic Profiles Associated With Traumatic Brain Injury in Nova Scotia.
    Kureshi N; Abidi SSR; Clarke DB; Zeng W; Feng C
    J Neurotrauma; 2024 Apr; 41(7-8):844-861. PubMed ID: 38047531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving geocoding matching rates of structured addresses in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Cortes TR; Silveira IHD; Junger WL
    Cad Saude Publica; 2021; 37(7):e00039321. PubMed ID: 34346979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positional accuracy and geographic bias of four methods of geocoding in epidemiologic research.
    Schootman M; Sterling DA; Struthers J; Yan Y; Laboube T; Emo B; Higgs G
    Ann Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 17(6):464-70. PubMed ID: 17448683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Match rate and positional accuracy of two geocoding methods for epidemiologic research.
    Zhan FB; Brender JD; De Lima I; Suarez L; Langlois PH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(11):842-9. PubMed ID: 17027286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.