These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28027052)

  • 1. Applying the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement Model to Explore Reviewer Ratings of Conference Proposals.
    Bradley KD; Peabody MR; Mensah RK
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(3):283-292. PubMed ID: 28027052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of adjusting for inter-rater variability in conference abstract ranking and selection processes.
    Scanlan JN; Lannin NA; Hoffmann T; Stanley M; McDonald R
    Aust Occup Ther J; 2018 Feb; 65(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 29266305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can rasch analysis enhance the abstract ranking process in scientific conferences? Issues of interrater variability and abstract rating burden.
    Scanlan JN; Lannin NA; Hoffmann T
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2015; 35(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 25799969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(4):386-422. PubMed ID: 14523257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):189-227. PubMed ID: 15064538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Objective measurement of figure skating performance.
    Looney MA
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):143-63. PubMed ID: 9661718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rater effect comparability in local independence and rater bundle models.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 24950533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Performance assessment using the Many-Facet Rasch Measurement].
    Prieto Adánez G
    Psicothema; 2011 Apr; 23(2):233-8. PubMed ID: 21504675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scale Anchoring with the Rasch Model.
    Wyse AE
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 28453498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Funding Medical Research Projects: Taking into Account Referees' Severity and Consistency through Many-Faceted Rasch Modeling of Projects' Scores.
    Tesio L; Simone A; Grzeda MT; Ponzio M; Dati G; Zaratin P; Perucca L; Battaglia MA
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(2):129-52. PubMed ID: 26075663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining the Psychometric Quality of Multiple-Choice Assessment Items using Mokken Scale Analysis.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(2):142-165. PubMed ID: 28009581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Many-facet Rasch analysis with crossed, nested, and mixed designs.
    Schumacker RE
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(4):323-38. PubMed ID: 10572385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of a comprehensiveness of Rasch measurement application scale.
    Lamprianou I
    J Appl Meas; 2006; 7(1):92-116. PubMed ID: 16385153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validity and reliability of an application review process using dedicated reviewers in one stage of a multi-stage admissions model.
    Zeeman JM; McLaughlin JE; Cox WC
    Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2017 Nov; 9(6):972-979. PubMed ID: 29233394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigation of 360-degree instrumentation effects: application of the Rasch rating scale model.
    Kulas JT; Hannum KM
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 18250526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Panel discussion does not improve reliability of peer review for medical research grant proposals.
    Fogelholm M; Leppinen S; Auvinen A; Raitanen J; Nuutinen A; Väänänen K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 21831594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validating Translation Test Items via the Many-Facet Rasch Model.
    Tseng WT; Su TY; Nix JL
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Apr; 122(2):748-772. PubMed ID: 29642780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.