135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28027762)
1. Pressure-standardised mammography does not affect visibility, contrast and sharpness of stable lesions.
de Groot JE; Hopman IGM; van Lier MGJTB; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():289-295. PubMed ID: 28027762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Towards personalized compression in mammography: a comparison study between pressure- and force-standardization.
de Groot JE; Branderhorst W; Grimbergen CA; den Heeten GJ; Broeders MJM
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):384-391. PubMed ID: 25554008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel approach to mammographic breast compression: Improved standardization and reduced discomfort by controlling pressure instead of force.
de Groot JE; Broeders MJ; Branderhorst W; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081901. PubMed ID: 23927315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is Individualizing Breast Compression during Mammography useful? - Investigations of pain indications during mammography relating to compression force and surface area of the compressed breast.
Feder K; Grunert JH
Rofo; 2017 Jan; 189(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 28002858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic compression--a need for mechanical standardization.
Branderhorst W; de Groot JE; Highnam R; Chan A; Böhm-Vélez M; Broeders MJ; den Heeten GJ; Grimbergen CA
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 25596915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical validation of a pressure-standardized compression mammography system.
den Boer D; Dam-Vervloet LAJ; Boomsma MF; de Boer E; van Dalen JA; Poot L
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():251-254. PubMed ID: 30017290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of Full-quality DICOM Images Compared to Minimally Compressed Mammograms in JPEG Format for Radiology Training: A Study From Radiologist and Radiographer Perspectives.
Trieu PDY; Barron M; Lewis SJ
Acad Radiol; 2023 Aug; 30(8):1748-1755. PubMed ID: 36567143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Breast Compression Be Reduced in Digital Mammography and Breast Tomosynthesis?
Agasthya GA; D'Orsi E; Kim YJ; Handa P; Ho CP; D'Orsi CJ; Sechopoulos I
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):W322-W332. PubMed ID: 28929809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic compression practices of force- and pressure-standardisation protocol: A scoping review.
Serwan E; Matthews D; Davies J; Chau M
J Med Radiat Sci; 2020 Sep; 67(3):233-242. PubMed ID: 32420700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast compression in mammography: how much is enough?
Poulos A; McLean D; Rickard M; Heard R
Australas Radiol; 2003 Jun; 47(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 12780439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.
Balleyguier C; Cousin M; Dunant A; Attard M; Delaloge S; Arfi-Rouche J
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 103():137-142. PubMed ID: 30223227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yang Y; Rong D; Yao X; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 18608020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of breast compression on lesion characteristic visibility with diffraction-enhanced imaging.
Faulconer LS; Parham CA; Connor DM; Kuzmiak C; Koomen M; Lee Y; Cho KR; Rafoth J; Livasy CA; Kim E; Zeng D; Cole E; Zhong Z; Pisano ED
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):433-40. PubMed ID: 20036586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of pressure-controlled mammography compression paddles with respect to force-controlled compression paddles in clinical practice.
Jeukens CRLPN; van Dijk T; Berben C; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MBI
Eur Radiol; 2019 May; 29(5):2545-2552. PubMed ID: 30617472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast compression across consecutive examinations among females participating in BreastScreen Norway.
Waade GG; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20180209. PubMed ID: 29927636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast compression in mammography: pressure distribution patterns.
Dustler M; Andersson I; Brorson H; Fröjd P; Mattsson S; Tingberg A; Zackrisson S; Förnvik D
Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov; 53(9):973-80. PubMed ID: 22949732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast compression and experienced pain during mammography by use of three different compression paddles.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Evensen KT; Hantho C; Iden KA; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 115():59-65. PubMed ID: 31084760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast compression and radiation dose in two different mammographic oblique projections: 45 and 60 degrees.
Brnić Z; Hebrang A
Eur J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 40(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 11673002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the use of self-compression in mammography affect compression force, breast thickness, and mean glandular dose?
Alukic E; Bravhar P; Mekis N
Eur J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 139():109694. PubMed ID: 33839429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compression forces used in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Waade GG; Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Hogg P; Hofvind S
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160770. PubMed ID: 28102696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
