These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28028140)

  • 1. Comparative Evaluation of a Silicone Membrane as an Alternative to Skin for Testing Mosquito Repellents.
    Agramonte NM; Gezan SA; Bernier UR
    J Med Entomol; 2017 May; 54(3):631-637. PubMed ID: 28028140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New mosquito repellency bioassay for evaluation of repellents and pyrethroids using an attractive blood-feeding device.
    Morimoto Y; Kawada H; Kuramoto KY; Mitsuhashi T; Saitoh T; Minakawa N
    Parasit Vectors; 2021 Mar; 14(1):151. PubMed ID: 33691776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Limitation of using synthetic human odours to test mosquito repellents.
    Okumu FO; Titus E; Mbeyela E; Killeen GF; Moore SJ
    Malar J; 2009 Jul; 8():150. PubMed ID: 19583848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites.
    Fradin MS; Day JF
    N Engl J Med; 2002 Jul; 347(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 12097535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The efficacy of repellents against Aedes, Anopheles, Culex and Ixodes spp. - a literature review.
    Lupi E; Hatz C; Schlagenhauf P
    Travel Med Infect Dis; 2013; 11(6):374-411. PubMed ID: 24201040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and Deet suppress human blood feeding by Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi.
    Klun JA; Khrimian A; Debboun M
    J Med Entomol; 2006 Jan; 43(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16506445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the sensitivity of Aedes aegypti and Anopheles gambiae complex mosquitoes to two insect repellents: DEET and KBR 3023.
    Badolo A; Ilboudo-Sanogo E; Ouédraogo AP; Costantini C
    Trop Med Int Health; 2004 Mar; 9(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 14996361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laboratory and field evaluations of the insect repellent 3535 (ethyl butylacetylaminopropionate) and deet against mosquito vectors in Thailand.
    Thavara U; Tawatsin A; Chompoosri J; Suwonkerd W; Chansang UR; Asavadachanukorn P
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2001 Sep; 17(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 14529087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Field evaluation of the efficacy of proprietary repellent formulations with IR3535 and picaridin against Aedes aegypti.
    Naucke TJ; Kröpke R; Benner G; Schulz J; Wittern KP; Rose A; Kröckel U; Grünewald HW
    Parasitol Res; 2007 Jun; 101(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 17252270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of synthetic repellents on mosquito nets in experimental huts against insecticide-resistant Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes.
    N'Guessan R; Rowland M; Moumouni TL; Kesse NB; Carnevale P
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2006 Dec; 100(12):1091-7. PubMed ID: 16963093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Chemical and Plant-Based Insect Repellents: Efficacy, Safety, and Toxicity.
    Diaz JH
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2016 Mar; 27(1):153-63. PubMed ID: 26827259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A bioassay for mosquito repellency against Aedes aegypti: method validation and bioactivities of DEET analogues.
    Jahn A; Kim SY; Choi JH; Kim DD; Ahn YJ; Yong CS; Kim JS
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2010 Jan; 62(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 20723004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mosquito Repellents: Efficacy Tests of Commercial Skin-Applied Products in China.
    Peng ZY; He MZ; Zhou LY; Wu XY; Wang LM; Li N; Deng SQ
    Molecules; 2022 Aug; 27(17):. PubMed ID: 36080301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Milestone In Botanical Mosquito Repellents: Novel PMD-Based Formulation Protects More Than Twice As Long As High-Concentration Deet and Other Leading Products.
    Carroll SP; Venturino J; Davies JH
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2019 Sep; 35(3):186-191. PubMed ID: 31647713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a Noncontact, Alternative Mosquito Repellent Assay System.
    Tisgratog R; Kongmee M; Sanguanpong U; Prabaripai A; Bangs MJ; Chareonviriyaphap T
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 2016 Sep; 32(3):177-184. PubMed ID: 27802399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Efficacy of Some Commercially Available Insect Repellents for Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae).
    Rodriguez SD; Drake LL; Price DP; Hammond JI; Hansen IA
    J Insect Sci; 2015; 15(1):140. PubMed ID: 26443777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Field evaluation against mosquitoes of regular and polymer-based deet formulations in Manitoba, Canada, with comment on methodological issues.
    Schofield S; Tepper M; Gadawski R
    J Med Entomol; 2007 May; 44(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 17547231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of skin abrasions on the efficacy of the repellent deet against Aedes aegypti.
    Rueda LM; Rutledge LC; Gupta RK
    J Am Mosq Control Assoc; 1998 Jun; 14(2):178-82. PubMed ID: 9673919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the efficacy of candidate mosquito repellents against the background of an attractive source that mimics a human host.
    Menger DJ; Van Loon JJ; Takken W
    Med Vet Entomol; 2014 Dec; 28(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 24797537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterisation of actions of p-menthane-3,8-diol repellent formulations against Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.
    Goodyer L; Grootveld M; Deobhankar K; Debboun M; Philip M
    Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg; 2020 Sep; 114(9):687-692. PubMed ID: 32542324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.