These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28028417)

  • 1. A Twofold Comparison between Dual Cure Resin Modified Cement and Glass Ionomer Cement for Orthodontic Band Cementation.
    Attar HE; Elhiny O; Salem G; Abdelrahman A; Attia M
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2016 Dec; 4(4):695-699. PubMed ID: 28028417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin-modified glass ionomer, modified composite or conventional glass ionomer for band cementation?--an in vitro evaluation.
    Millett DT; Cummings A; Letters S; Roger E; Love J
    Eur J Orthod; 2003 Dec; 25(6):609-14. PubMed ID: 14700267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-vitro study of resin-modified glass ionomer cements for cementation of orthodontic bands. Isolation, surplus removal and humidity as factors influencing the bond strength between enamel, cement and metal.
    Liebmann SM; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    J Orofac Orthop; 1999; 60(5):348-60. PubMed ID: 10546417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Shear Peel Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Cements Used for Fixed Space Maintainer Cementation: An
    Kaur J; Singh A; Sadana G; Mehra M; Mahajan M
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(2):175-179. PubMed ID: 34413586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of orthodontic band cements.
    Millett DT; Duff S; Morrison L; Cummings A; Gilmour WH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Jan; 123(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 12532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements for Cementation of Stainless Steel Bands on Primary Molar Crowns (Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns): An
    Kalaskar R; Ijalkar R; Kalaskar A; Balasubramanian S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(6):762-767. PubMed ID: 35110868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chlorhexidine-modified glass ionomer for band cementation? An in vitro study.
    Millett DT; Doubleday B; Alatsaris M; Love J; Wood D; Luther F; Devine D
    J Orthod; 2005 Mar; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 15784942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bond strengths between composite resin and auto cure glass ionomer cement using the co-cure technique.
    Knight GM; McIntyre JM; Mulyani
    Aust Dent J; 2006 Jun; 51(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 16848267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro bond strength and fatigue stress test evaluation of different adhesive cements used for fixed space maintainer cementation.
    Cantekin K; Delikan E; Cetin S
    Eur J Dent; 2014 Jul; 8(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 25202209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tensile bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to microabraded and silica-coated or tin-plated high noble ceramic alloy.
    Swartz JM; Davis RD; Overton JD
    J Prosthodont; 2000 Dec; 9(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 11320471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bond strength for orthodontic brackets contaminated by blood: composite versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Reddy L; Marker VA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 61(2):206-13. PubMed ID: 12618999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of environmental pressure changes on the retentive strength of cements for orthodontic bands.
    Gulve MN; Gulve ND; Shinde R; Kolhe SJ
    Diving Hyperb Med; 2012 Jun; 42(2):78-81. PubMed ID: 22828814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
    Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Cement to Different Root Perforation Materials.
    Lemos Martins Sicuro S; Gabardo MC; Castiglia Gonzaga C; Dias Morais N; Baratto-Filho F; Correr Nolasco GM; Leonardi DP
    J Endod; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1819-1821. PubMed ID: 27769677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of shear bond strength of resin reinforced chemical cure glass ionomer, conventional chemical cure glass ionomer and chemical cure composite resin in direct bonding systems: an in vitro study.
    Rao KS; Reddy TP; Yugandhar G; Kumar BS; Reddy SN; Babu DA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 23579887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cements to Different Core Buildup Materials in Lactic Acid Buffer Solution.
    Patil SM; Kamble VB; Desai RG; Arabbi KC; Prakash V
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2015 Aug; 9(8):ZC84-7. PubMed ID: 26436055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of shear-peel band strengths of 5 orthodontic cements.
    Aggarwal M; Foley TF; Rix D
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Aug; 70(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 10961781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orthodontic bracket bonding with a plasma-arc light and resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement.
    Ishikawa H; Komori A; Kojima I; Ando F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jul; 120(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 11455379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of using self-etching primer for bonding orthodontic brackets.
    Yamada R; Hayakawa T; Kasai K
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12518948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.