These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28029358)
21. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study. Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of proximal humeral bone stresses between stemless, short stem, and standard stem length: a finite element analysis. Razfar N; Reeves JM; Langohr DG; Willing R; Athwal GS; Johnson JA J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1076-83. PubMed ID: 26810016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Finite Element Analysis of Mobile-bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: The Influence of Tibial Component Coronal Alignment. Zhu GD; Guo WS; Zhang QD; Liu ZH; Cheng LM Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Nov; 128(21):2873-8. PubMed ID: 26521784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Individualized unicondylar knee replacement : Use of patient-specific implants and instruments]. Arnholdt J; Holzapfel BM; Sefrin L; Rudert M; Beckmann J; Steinert AF Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2017 Feb; 29(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 28144717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study. Rankin KE; Dickinson AS; Briscoe A; Browne M Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2405-2413. PubMed ID: 27020431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The influence of tibial component malalignment on bone strain in revision total knee replacement. Rastetter BR; Wright SJ; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW; Clift SE Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Jun; 230(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 27006420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. X-ray image review of the bone remodeling around an osseointegrated trans-femoral implant and a finite element simulation case study. Xu W; Robinson K Ann Biomed Eng; 2008 Mar; 36(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 18197477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of micromotion initiation of an implanted femur under physiological loads and constraints using the finite element method. Andreaus U; Colloca M Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jul; 223(5):589-605. PubMed ID: 19623912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Numerical evaluation of bone remodelling and adaptation considering different hip prosthesis designs. Levadnyi I; Awrejcewicz J; Gubaua JE; Pereira JT Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Dec; 50():122-129. PubMed ID: 29100185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. All-polyethylene tibial components generate higher stress and micromotions than metal-backed tibial components in total knee arthroplasty. Brihault J; Navacchia A; Pianigiani S; Labey L; De Corte R; Pascale V; Innocenti B Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2550-9. PubMed ID: 25957612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty promote early loosening of the femoral component? Zelle J; Janssen D; Van Eijden J; De Waal Malefijt M; Verdonschot N J Orthop Res; 2011 Jul; 29(7):976-83. PubMed ID: 21308756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Influence of the distal femoral resection angle on the principal stresses in ceramic total knee components. Kluess D; Bergschmidt P; Mueller I; Mittelmeier W; Bader R Knee; 2012 Dec; 19(6):846-50. PubMed ID: 22542212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Primary stability of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty under dynamic flexion movement in human femora. Grupp TM; Holderied M; Pietschmann MF; Schröder C; Islas Padilla AP; Schilling C; Jansson V; Müller PE Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Jan; 41():39-47. PubMed ID: 27923169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A different fixation of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty may lead to preservation of femoral bone stock. Barink M; Verdonschot N; de Waal Malefijt M Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 14558644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of proximal tibia behaviour with the use of femoral stems in revision TKA: an in vitro and finite element analysis. Completo A; Rego A; Fonseca F; Ramos A; Relvas C; Simões JA Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Feb; 25(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 19944503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of mechanical stress and change in bone mineral density between two types of femoral implant using finite element analysis. Hirata Y; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ike H; Fujimaki H; Saito T J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1731-5. PubMed ID: 23683518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent. Thompson SM; Yohuno D; Bradley WN; Crocombe AD Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2560-6. PubMed ID: 26694487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of interface condition and implant design on bone remodelling and failure risk for the resurfaced femoral head. Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Laird L; Nassutt R; Morlock M J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1646-53. PubMed ID: 21511258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Computational modelling of motion at the bone-implant interface after total knee arthroplasty: The role of implant design and surgical fit. Conlisk N; Howie CR; Pankaj P Knee; 2017 Oct; 24(5):994-1005. PubMed ID: 28778499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]