237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28030713)
1. Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States.
Adam MA; Thomas S; Youngwirth L; Pappas T; Roman SA; Sosa JA
JAMA Surg; 2017 Apr; 152(4):336-342. PubMed ID: 28030713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Cancer: Practice Patterns and Short-term Outcomes Among 7061 Patients.
Adam MA; Choudhury K; Dinan MA; Reed SD; Scheri RP; Blazer DG; Roman SA; Sosa JA
Ann Surg; 2015 Aug; 262(2):372-7. PubMed ID: 26158612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determining Hospital Volume Threshold for Safety of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Contemporary Cutpoint Analysis.
Conroy PC; Calthorpe L; Lin JA; Mohamedaly S; Kim A; Hirose K; Nakakura E; Corvera C; Sosa JA; Sarin A; Kirkwood KS; Alseidi A; Adam MA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):1566-1574. PubMed ID: 34724124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: Pan-European Validation.
Mungroop TH; Klompmaker S; Wellner UF; Steyerberg EW; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; de Pastena M; Dokmak S; Khatkov I; Saint-Marc O; Wittel U; Abu Hilal M; Fuks D; Poves I; Keck T; Boggi U; Besselink MG;
Ann Surg; 2021 Feb; 273(2):334-340. PubMed ID: 30829699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Implementation and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy in Europe: a registry-based retrospective study - a critical appraisal of the first 3 years of the E-MIPS registry.
Emmen AMLH; de Graaf N; Khatkov IE; Busch OR; Dokmak S; Boggi U; Groot Koerkamp B; Ferrari G; Molenaar IQ; Saint-Marc O; Ramera M; Lips DJ; Mieog JSD; Luyer MDP; Keck T; D'Hondt M; Souche FR; Edwin B; Hackert T; Liem MSL; Iben-Khayat A; van Santvoort HC; Mazzola M; de Wilde RF; Kauffmann EF; Aussilhou B; Festen S; Izrailov R; Tyutyunnik P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2226-2233. PubMed ID: 38265434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes.
Nassour I; Choti MA; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Wang SC; Polanco PM
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2907-2913. PubMed ID: 29280014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National Pancreatic Fistula Rates after Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A NSQIP Analysis.
Panni RZ; Guerra J; Hawkins WG; Hall BL; Asbun HJ; Sanford DE
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Aug; 229(2):192-199.e1. PubMed ID: 30797082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a NSQIP Analysis.
Nassour I; Wang SC; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Augustine MM; Polanco PM; Mansour JC; Minter RM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 Nov; 21(11):1784-1792. PubMed ID: 28819886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use and outcome of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery in the European E-MIPS registry.
van der Heijde N; Vissers FL; Manzoni A; Zimmitti G; Balsells J; Berrevoet F; Bjornsson B; van den Boezem P; Boggi U; Bratlie SO; Burdio F; Coratti A; D'Hondt M; Del Pozo CD; Dokmak S; Fara R; Can MF; Festen S; Forgione A; Fristrup C; Gaujoux S; Groot Koerkamp B; Hackert T; Khatkov IE; Keck T; Seppänen H; Lips D; Luyer M; Pittau G; Maglione M; Molenaar IQ; Pessaux P; Roeyen G; Saint-Marc O; Cabus SS; van Santvoort H; van der Schelling G; Serradilla-Martin M; Souche FR; Suarez Muñoz MÁ; Marino MV; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
HPB (Oxford); 2023 Apr; 25(4):400-408. PubMed ID: 37028826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the hospital volume threshold to optimize inpatient complication rate after partial nephrectomy?
Arora S; Keeley J; Pucheril D; Menon M; Rogers CG
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):339.e17-339.e23. PubMed ID: 29773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy at Low and High-Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern AL; Ahrendt SA; McCarter MD; Del Chiaro M; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
J Surg Res; 2021 Dec; 268():720-728. PubMed ID: 34487965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
de Rooij T; van Hilst J; Bosscha K; Dijkgraaf MG; Gerhards MF; Groot Koerkamp B; Hagendoorn J; de Hingh IH; Karsten TM; Lips DJ; Luyer MD; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Tran TCK; Busch OR; Festen S; Besselink MG;
Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 29298706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk of conversion to open surgery during robotic and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy and effect on outcomes: international propensity score-matched comparison study.
Lof S; Vissers FL; Klompmaker S; Berti S; Boggi U; Coratti A; Dokmak S; Fara R; Festen S; D'Hondt M; Khatkov I; Lips D; Luyer M; Manzoni A; Rosso E; Saint-Marc O; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Br J Surg; 2021 Jan; 108(1):80-87. PubMed ID: 33640946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Propensity-matched Study From a National Cohort of Patients.
Nassour I; Wang SC; Christie A; Augustine MM; Porembka MR; Yopp AC; Choti MA; Mansour JC; Xie XJ; Polanco PM; Minter RM
Ann Surg; 2018 Jul; 268(1):151-157. PubMed ID: 28486387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of Surgeon Case Numbers of Pancreaticoduodenectomies vs Related Procedures With Patient Outcomes to Inform Volume-Based Credentialing.
Sheetz KH; Nuliyalu U; Nathan H; Sonnenday CJ
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Apr; 3(4):e203850. PubMed ID: 32347950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Association of Hospital Volume With Laryngectomy Outcomes in Patients With Larynx Cancer.
Gourin CG; Stewart CM; Frick KD; Fakhry C; Pitman KT; Eisele DW; Austin JM
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Jan; 145(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 30476965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
