509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28031323)
1. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists during selection of a single Day 5 embryo for transfer: a multicenter study.
Storr A; Venetis CA; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 28031323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Should we freeze it? Agreement on fate of borderline blastocysts is poor and does not improve with a modified blastocyst grading system.
Hammond ER; Foong AKM; Rosli N; Morbeck DE
Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1045-1053. PubMed ID: 32358601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Embryologist agreement when assessing blastocyst implantation probability: is data-driven prediction the solution to embryo assessment subjectivity?
Fordham DE; Rosentraub D; Polsky AL; Aviram T; Wolf Y; Perl O; Devir A; Rosentraub S; Silver DH; Gold Zamir Y; Bronstein AM; Lara Lara M; Ben Nagi J; Alvarez A; Munné S
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2275-2290. PubMed ID: 35944167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BlastAssist: a deep learning pipeline to measure interpretable features of human embryos.
Yang HY; Leahy BD; Jang WD; Wei D; Kalma Y; Rahav R; Carmon A; Kopel R; Azem F; Venturas M; Kelleher CP; Cam L; Pfister H; Needleman DJ; Ben-Yosef D
Hum Reprod; 2024 Apr; 39(4):698-708. PubMed ID: 38396213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discard or not discard, that is the question: an international survey across 117 embryologists on the clinical management of borderline quality blastocysts.
Chiappetta V; Innocenti F; Coticchio G; Ahlström A; Albricci L; Badajoz V; Hebles M; Gallardo M; Benini F; Canosa S; Kumpošt J; Milton K; Montanino Oliva D; Maggiulli R; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D
Hum Reprod; 2023 Oct; 38(10):1901-1909. PubMed ID: 37649342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter- and intra-observer variability of time-lapse annotations.
Sundvall L; Ingerslev HJ; Breth Knudsen U; Kirkegaard K
Hum Reprod; 2013 Dec; 28(12):3215-21. PubMed ID: 24070998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Semi-automated morphometric analysis of human embryos can reveal correlations between total embryo volume and clinical pregnancy.
Paternot G; Debrock S; De Neubourg D; D'Hooghe TM; Spiessens C
Hum Reprod; 2013 Mar; 28(3):627-33. PubMed ID: 23315063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A double-blind randomized controlled trial investigating a time-lapse algorithm for selecting Day 5 blastocysts for transfer.
Ahlström A; Lundin K; Lind AK; Gunnarsson K; Westlander G; Park H; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Thorsteinsdottir SA; Einarsson S; Åström M; Löfdahl K; Menezes J; Callender S; Nyberg C; Winerdal J; Stenfelt C; Jonassen BR; Oldereid N; Nolte L; Sundler M; Hardarson T
Hum Reprod; 2022 Apr; 37(4):708-717. PubMed ID: 35143661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High reliability of morphokinetic annotations among embryologists.
Martínez M; Santaló J; Rodríguez A; Vassena R
Hum Reprod Open; 2018; 2018(3):hoy009. PubMed ID: 30895250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intra- and interobserver analysis in the morphological assessment of early stage embryos during an IVF procedure: a multicentre study.
Paternot G; Wetzels AM; Thonon F; Vansteenbrugge A; Willemen D; Devroe J; Debrock S; D'Hooghe TM; Spiessens C
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2011 Sep; 9():127. PubMed ID: 21920032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Paternal influence of sperm DNA integrity on early embryonic development.
Simon L; Murphy K; Shamsi MB; Liu L; Emery B; Aston KI; Hotaling J; Carrell DT
Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2402-12. PubMed ID: 25205757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of a new clinically applicable device for embryo evaluation which measures embryo oxygen consumption.
Kurosawa H; Utsunomiya H; Shiga N; Takahashi A; Ihara M; Ishibashi M; Nishimoto M; Watanabe Z; Abe H; Kumagai J; Terada Y; Igarashi H; Takahashi T; Fukui A; Suganuma R; Tachibana M; Yaegashi N
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2321-30. PubMed ID: 27609982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differences in gene expression profiles between human preimplantation embryos cultured in two different IVF culture media.
Kleijkers SH; Eijssen LM; Coonen E; Derhaag JG; Mantikou E; Jonker MJ; Mastenbroek S; Repping S; Evers JL; Dumoulin JC; van Montfoort AP
Hum Reprod; 2015 Oct; 30(10):2303-11. PubMed ID: 26202924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single embryo transfer by Day 3 time-lapse selection versus Day 5 conventional morphological selection: a randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Yang L; Cai S; Zhang S; Kong X; Gu Y; Lu C; Dai J; Gong F; Lu G; Lin G
Hum Reprod; 2018 May; 33(5):869-876. PubMed ID: 29546361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.
Minasi MG; Colasante A; Riccio T; Ruberti A; Casciani V; Scarselli F; Spinella F; Fiorentino F; Varricchio MT; Greco E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Oct; 31(10):2245-54. PubMed ID: 27591227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-lapse algorithms and morphological selection of day-5 embryos for transfer: a preclinical validation study.
Storr A; Venetis C; Cooke S; Kilani S; Ledger W
Fertil Steril; 2018 Feb; 109(2):276-283.e3. PubMed ID: 29331237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective study of automated versus manual annotation of early time-lapse markers in the human preimplantation embryo.
Kaser DJ; Farland LV; Missmer SA; Racowsky C
Hum Reprod; 2017 Aug; 32(8):1604-1611. PubMed ID: 28854587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Morphology vs morphokinetics: a retrospective comparison of inter-observer and intra-observer agreement between embryologists on blastocysts with known implantation outcome.
Adolfsson E; Andershed AN
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2018 Sep; 22(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 29912521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The higher the score, the better the clinical outcome: retrospective evaluation of automatic embryo grading as a support tool for embryo selection in IVF laboratories.
Bori L; Meseguer F; Valera MA; Galan A; Remohi J; Meseguer M
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1148-1160. PubMed ID: 35435210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
