174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28031426)
1. Molecular Profiling to Determine Clonality of Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsies from Men on Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Palapattu GS; Salami SS; Cani AK; Hovelson DH; Lazo de la Vega L; Vandenberg KR; Bratley JV; Liu CJ; Kunju LP; Montgomery JS; Morgan TM; Natarajan S; Huang J; Tomlins SA; Marks LS
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Feb; 23(4):985-991. PubMed ID: 28031426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Serial Molecular Profiling of Low-grade Prostate Cancer to Assess Tumor Upgrading: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Salami SS; Tosoian JJ; Nallandhighal S; Jones TA; Brockman S; Elkhoury FF; Bazzi S; Plouffe KR; Siddiqui J; Liu CJ; Kunju LP; Morgan TM; Natarajan S; Boonstra PS; Sumida L; Tomlins SA; Udager AM; Sisk AE; Marks LS; Palapattu GS
Eur Urol; 2021 Apr; 79(4):456-465. PubMed ID: 32631746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Jayadevan R; Felker ER; Kwan L; Barsa DE; Zhang H; Sisk AE; Delfin M; Marks LS
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Sep; 2(9):e1911019. PubMed ID: 31509206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of Tracking Biopsy in Men Undergoing Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer.
Chang E; Jones TA; Natarajan S; Sharma D; Simopoulos D; Margolis DJ; Huang J; Dorey FJ; Marks LS
J Urol; 2018 Jan; 199(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28728993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.
Walton Diaz A; Shakir NA; George AK; Rais-Bahrami S; Turkbey B; Rothwax JT; Stamatakis L; Hong CW; Siddiqui MM; Okoro C; Raskolnikov D; Su D; Shih J; Han H; Parnes HL; Merino MJ; Simon RM; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2015 May; 33(5):202.e1-202.e7. PubMed ID: 25754621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Standardized Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reporting Using the Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion with Transperineal Saturation Biopsy to Select Men on Active Surveillance.
Dieffenbacher S; Nyarangi-Dix J; Giganti F; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Müller-Wolf MB; Schütz V; Gasch C; Hatiboglu G; Hauffe M; Stenzinger A; Duensing S; Schlemmer HP; Moore CM; Hohenfellner M; Radtke JP
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jan; 7(1):102-110. PubMed ID: 30878348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors predicting prostate cancer upgrading on magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy in an active surveillance population.
Lai WS; Gordetsky JB; Thomas JV; Nix JW; Rais-Bahrami S
Cancer; 2017 Jun; 123(11):1941-1948. PubMed ID: 28140460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeted Biopsy to Detect Gleason Score Upgrading during Active Surveillance for Men with Low versus Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Nassiri N; Margolis DJ; Natarajan S; Sharma DS; Huang J; Dorey FJ; Marks LS
J Urol; 2017 Mar; 197(3 Pt 1):632-639. PubMed ID: 27639713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting Gleason Group Progression for Men on Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance: Role of a Negative Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Bloom JB; Hale GR; Gold SA; Rayn KN; Smith C; Mehralivand S; Czarniecki M; Valera V; Wood BJ; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Parnes HL; Turkbey B; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 30577395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply?
Hu JC; Chang E; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Macairan M; Lieu P; Huang J; Sonn G; Dorey FJ; Marks LS
J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 24512956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.
Siddiqui MM; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong H; Stamatakis L; Vourganti S; Nix J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Shuch B; Weintraub M; Kruecker J; Amalou H; Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):713-719. PubMed ID: 23787357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging-transectal ultrasound image-fusion biopsies accurately characterize the index tumor: correlation with step-sectioned radical prostatectomy specimens in 135 patients.
Baco E; Ukimura O; Rud E; Vlatkovic L; Svindland A; Aron M; Palmer S; Matsugasumi T; Marien A; Bernhard JC; Rewcastle JC; Eggesbø HB; Gill IS
Eur Urol; 2015 Apr; 67(4):787-94. PubMed ID: 25240973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can exclude prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.
Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Mones F; Westphalen AC; Mally D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6042-6051. PubMed ID: 32591887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancers Emerge through Branched Evolution of Clonal Gleason Pattern 3 and 4.
Sowalsky AG; Kissick HT; Gerrin SJ; Schaefer RJ; Xia Z; Russo JW; Arredouani MS; Bubley GJ; Sanda MG; Li W; Ye H; Balk SP
Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Jul; 23(14):3823-3833. PubMed ID: 28119368
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.
Sonn GA; Chang E; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Macairan M; Lieu P; Huang J; Dorey FJ; Reiter RE; Marks LS
Eur Urol; 2014 Apr; 65(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 23523537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].
Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Kilic E; Asbach P; Haas M; Günzel K; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Cash H
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 25519051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging predict upgrading of transrectal ultrasound biopsy results at more definitive histology?
Abd-Alazeez M; Ahmed HU; Arya M; Allen C; Dikaios N; Freeman A; Emberton M; Kirkham A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Aug; 32(6):741-7. PubMed ID: 24981993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
