BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28032917)

  • 21. The relation between percentage of immunostained cells and amplification status in breast cancers with equivocal result for Her2 immunohistochemistry.
    Onguru O; Zhang PJ
    Pathol Res Pract; 2016 May; 212(5):381-4. PubMed ID: 26872536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detailed Reanalysis of 500 Breast Cancers With Equivocal HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Borderline ERBB2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Results.
    Geiersbach KB; Sill DR; Del Rosario KM; Meyer RG; Spears GM; Yuhas JA; Sukov WR; Jenkins RB; Ocal IT; Mounajjed T; Chen B
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2021 Oct; 156(5):886-894. PubMed ID: 33942843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Impact of repeat HER2 testing after initial equivocal HER2 FISH results using 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines.
    Xu FP; Wang K; Xu J; Chen J; Zhang YF; Wu HM; Zhang MH; Long XX; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Lin DY; Liu YH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):757-764. PubMed ID: 28861637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What to expect from the 2018 ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline in the reflex in situ hybridization test of immunohistochemically equivocal 2+ cases?
    Curado M; Caramelo AS; Eloy C; Polónia A
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Sep; 475(3):303-311. PubMed ID: 30953146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting the HER2 status of breast cancer from basic histopathology data: an analysis of 1500 breast cancers as part of the HER2000 International Study.
    Bilous M; Ades C; Armes J; Bishop J; Brown R; Cooke B; Cummings M; Farshid G; Field A; Morey A; McKenzie P; Raymond W; Robbins P; Tan L
    Breast; 2003 Apr; 12(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 14659337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Impact of 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologist guidelines on borderline immunostaining results for HER2: a retrospective study on HER2 FISH results in 1 780 cases of invasive breast cancers].
    Xu Y; Bai QM; Yang F; Zhu XL; Lu YM; Zhang J; Yang WT; Zhou XY
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 45(8):545-9. PubMed ID: 27510780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 reporting guidelines in breast cancer: An assessment study from Indian oncology centre that primarily performs HER2 IHC testing with special emphasis on IHC equivocal category.
    Pasricha S; Gupta G; Garg R; Sharma A; Gandhi JS; Durga G; Kamboj M; Grover S; Mehta A
    Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):468-472. PubMed ID: 29251392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of molecular subtypes for the increased HER2 equivocal cases caused by application of the updated 2013 ASCO/CAP HER2 testing guidelines in breast cancer.
    Guo L; Yuan P; Zhang J; Ling Y; Li W; Zhao B; Ying J; Xuan L
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 28712009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
    Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Next-generation assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification status in invasive breast carcinoma: a focus on Group 4 by use of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists HER2 testing guideline.
    Hoda RS; Bowman AS; Zehir A; Razavi P; Brogi E; Ladanyi M; Arcila ME; Wen HY; Ross DS
    Histopathology; 2021 Mar; 78(4):498-507. PubMed ID: 32841416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 determination of invasive breast cancer: A single institution experience using frontline dual-color FISH.
    Ragazzi M; Bisagni A; Gasparini E; Kuhn E; Bassano C; Tamagnini I; Foroni M; Bortesi M; Falco G; Ferrari G; Braglia L; Savoldi L; Bologna A; Di Cicilia R; Bisagni G; Gardini G
    Breast; 2017 Aug; 34():65-72. PubMed ID: 28521178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact of the updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene testing in invasive breast cancers: A single center study.
    Lim TH; Lim AST; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2022 Jun; 58():151935. PubMed ID: 35313158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Correlation of HER2 overexpression with gene amplification and its relation to chromosome 17 aneuploidy: a 5-year experience with invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas.
    Nassar A; Khoor A; Radhakrishnan R; Radhakrishnan A; Cohen C
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(9):6254-61. PubMed ID: 25337277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast carcinomas with low amplified/equivocal HER2 by Ish: potential supporting role of multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
    Ercolani C; Marchiò C; Di Benedetto A; Fabi A; Perracchio L; Vici P; Sperati F; Buglioni S; Arena V; Pescarmona E; Sapino A; Terrenato I; Mottolese M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Oct; 36(1):143. PubMed ID: 29029640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The impact of 2018 ASCO-CAP HER2 testing guidelines on breast cancer HER2 results. An audit of 2132 consecutive cases evaluated by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization.
    Farshid G; Dhatrak D; Gilhotra A; Koszyca B; Nolan J
    Mod Pathol; 2020 Sep; 33(9):1783-1790. PubMed ID: 32366941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinicopathologic features of unexpectedly HER2 positive breast carcinomas: An institutional experience.
    LaBoy C; Siziopikou KP; Rosen L; Blanco LZ; Pincus JL
    Pathol Res Pract; 2021 Jun; 222():153441. PubMed ID: 33857853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Change in Pattern of HER2 Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Results in Breast Cancers Submitted for FISH Testing: Experience of a Reference Laboratory Using US Food and Drug Administration Criteria and American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists Guidelines.
    Shah MV; Wiktor AE; Meyer RG; Tenner KS; Ballman KV; Green SJ; Sukov WR; Ketterling RP; Perez EA; Jenkins RB
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3502-3510. PubMed ID: 27458302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Impact of Partial Weak Staining in Normal Breast Epithelium on the Reliability of Immunohistochemistry Results in HercepTest-positive Breast Cancer.
    Farra C; Fedda F; Tfayli A; Tawil A; Zaatari G; Ashkar H; Issa G; Boulos F
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2019 Oct; 19(5):340-344. PubMed ID: 31213407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RAI1 Alternate Probe Identifies Additional Breast Cancer Cases as Amplified Following Equivocal HER2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing: Experience From a National Reference Laboratory.
    Hui L; Geiersbach KB; Downs-Kelly E; Gulbahce HE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Feb; 141(2):274-278. PubMed ID: 27959582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. HER2 Equivocal (Score = 2+) Breast Carcinoma Cases Identified by Immunohistochemistry at a South African Hospital. What is the Impact of Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization Testing?
    Mohanlal RD; Bouwer N; Willem P
    Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Sep; 31(8):555-560. PubMed ID: 37471623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.