172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28034171)
1. Two-stage seamless transition design from open-label single-arm to randomized double-arm clinical trials.
Shi H; Yin G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jan; 27(1):158-171. PubMed ID: 28034171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. START: single-to-double arm transition design for phase II clinical trials.
Shi H; Zhang T; Yin G
Pharm Stat; 2020 Jul; 19(4):454-467. PubMed ID: 32061188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of single-arm vs. randomized phase II clinical trials: a Bayesian approach.
Sambucini V
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(3):474-89. PubMed ID: 24896838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A method for utilizing co-primary efficacy outcome measures to screen regimens for activity in two-stage Phase II clinical trials.
Sill MW; Rubinstein L; Litwin S; Yothers G
Clin Trials; 2012 Aug; 9(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 22811448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a multi-arm multi-stage Bayesian design for phase II drug selection trials - an example in hemato-oncology.
Jacob L; Uvarova M; Boulet S; Begaj I; Chevret S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jun; 16():67. PubMed ID: 27250349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accelerating clinical development of HIV vaccine strategies: methodological challenges and considerations in constructing an optimised multi-arm phase I/II trial design.
Richert L; Doussau A; Lelièvre JD; Arnold V; Rieux V; Bouakane A; Lévy Y; Chêne G; Thiébaut R;
Trials; 2014 Feb; 15():68. PubMed ID: 24571662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian single-to-double arm transition design using both short-term and long-term endpoints.
Xu T; Shi H; Lin R
Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(4):588-604. PubMed ID: 36755420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Applications of Bayesian statistical methodology to clinical trial design: A case study of a phase 2 trial with an interim futility assessment in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Smith CL; Jin Y; Raddad E; McNearney TA; Ni X; Monteith D; Brown R; Deeg MA; Schnitzer T
Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 30321909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting promising treatments in randomized Phase II cancer trials with an active control.
Cheung YK
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):494-508. PubMed ID: 19384691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Bayesian-frequentist two-stage single-arm phase II clinical trial design.
Dong G; Shih WJ; Moore D; Quan H; Marcella S
Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2055-67. PubMed ID: 22415966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of error rates in single-arm versus randomized phase II cancer clinical trials.
Tang H; Foster NR; Grothey A; Ansell SM; Goldberg RM; Sargent DJ
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Apr; 28(11):1936-41. PubMed ID: 20212253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal two-stage designs for single-arm phase II oncology trials with two binary endpoints.
Kunz CU; Kieser M
Methods Inf Med; 2011; 50(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 21057719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Applying a phase II futility study design to therapeutic stroke trials.
Palesch YY; Tilley BC; Sackett DL; Johnston KC; Woolson R
Stroke; 2005 Nov; 36(11):2410-4. PubMed ID: 16224086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized two-stage design for phase II clinical trials based on a Bayesian predictive approach.
Cellamare M; Sambucini V
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(6):1059-78. PubMed ID: 25545805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designs for clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes based on stopping guidelines for lack of benefit.
Royston P; Barthel FM; Parmar MK; Choodari-Oskooei B; Isham V
Trials; 2011 Mar; 12():81. PubMed ID: 21418571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Bayesian hierarchical monitoring design for phase II cancer clinical trials: Incorporating information on response duration into monitoring rules.
Wang J; Ma J; Cai C; Daver N; Ning J
Stat Med; 2021 Sep; 40(21):4629-4639. PubMed ID: 34101217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian predictive power for interim adaptation in seamless phase II/III trials where the endpoint is survival up to some specified timepoint.
Schmidli H; Bretz F; Racine-Poon A
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4925-38. PubMed ID: 17590875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Curtailed two-stage design for comparing two arms in randomized phase II clinical trials.
Chen CM; Chi Y; Chang HM
J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(5):939-950. PubMed ID: 29355457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monitoring futility and efficacy in phase II trials with Bayesian posterior distributions-A calibration approach.
Kopp-Schneider A; Wiesenfarth M; Witt R; Edelmann D; Witt O; Abel U
Biom J; 2019 May; 61(3):488-502. PubMed ID: 30175405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimal two-stage randomized phase II clinical trials.
Logan BR
Clin Trials; 2005; 2(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 16279574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
