These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2803438)
1. Use of class ranking in deans' letters. Toewe CH; Golay DR Acad Med; 1989 Nov; 64(11):690-1. PubMed ID: 2803438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Class ranking models for deans' letters and their psychometric evaluation. Blacklow RS; Goepp CE; Hojat M Acad Med; 1991 Sep; 66(9 Suppl):S10-2. PubMed ID: 1930514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A new approach to standardizing the dean's letter. Wagoner NE; Suriano JR Acad Med; 1989 Nov; 64(11):688-9. PubMed ID: 2803435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Variability in deans' letters. Ozuah PO JAMA; 2002 Sep; 288(9):1061. PubMed ID: 12204069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. First-year residents' performances compared with their medical school class ranks as determined by three ranking systems. Loftus LS; Arnold L; Willoughby TL; Connolly A Acad Med; 1992 May; 67(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 1575866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The quality of deans' letters from medical schools. Yager J; Strauss GD; Tardiff K J Med Educ; 1984 Jun; 59(6):471-8. PubMed ID: 6726766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing assessments of medical students' potentials as residents made by the residency directors and deans at two schools. Hunt DD; MacLaren CF; Carline J Acad Med; 1991 Jun; 66(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 2069654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National survey of writers of dean's letters for residency applications. Leiden LI; Miller GD J Med Educ; 1986 Dec; 61(12):943-53. PubMed ID: 3783637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of an objective rating system for residency applications. Clarke JR; Wigton RS Surgery; 1984 Aug; 96(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 6463863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating residency applicants: stable values in a changing market. Travis C; Taylor CA; Mayhew HE Fam Med; 1999 Apr; 31(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 10212766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided ranking of residency program applicants. McCabe JB; Herold RL J Med Educ; 1983 Aug; 58(8):656-7. PubMed ID: 6688274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Residency selection--you can't always get what you want. Hillman BJ Invest Radiol; 1990 Jul; 25(7):761-2. PubMed ID: 2391192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Resolved: all otolaryngology programs should participate in the residency matching program. Arch Otolaryngol; 1978 Nov; 104(11):627-35. PubMed ID: 708302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The interviewing process as it relates to the selection of candidates for general surgical residency programs. Dean RE; Dean KB; Nicholas WR; Scholten DJ Curr Surg; 1987; 44(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 3829707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The matching program from a student's viewpoint. How to win at residency roulette. Mason NE Arch Otolaryngol; 1978 Nov; 104(11):620-1. PubMed ID: 708299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Using National Board of Medical Examiners scores in selection of residents. Volle RL JAMA; 1988 Jan; 259(2):266. PubMed ID: 3336145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Numerical USMLE Step 1 Scores Are Still Important in Selection of Residency Applicants. Jayakumar KL Acad Med; 2016 Nov; 91(11):1470-1471. PubMed ID: 27779525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What attributes are necessary to be selected for an orthopaedic surgery residency position: perceptions of faculty and residents. Bajaj G; Carmichael KD South Med J; 2004 Dec; 97(12):1179-85. PubMed ID: 15646754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]