These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28034738)

  • 1. To squeeze or not to squeeze: How squeeze tubes affect consumers' serving sizes.
    Huyghe E; Geuens M; Vermeir I
    Appetite; 2017 Apr; 111():56-62. PubMed ID: 28034738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the labelled serving size on consumption: A systematic review.
    Bucher T; Murawski B; Duncanson K; Labbe D; Van der Horst K
    Appetite; 2018 Sep; 128():50-57. PubMed ID: 29859775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of increased serving sizes on consumption.
    Hydock C; Wilson A; Easwar K
    Appetite; 2016 Jun; 101():71-9. PubMed ID: 26928789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advertising models in the act of eating: How the depiction of different eating phases affects consumption desire and behavior.
    Palcu J; Haasova S; Florack A
    Appetite; 2019 Aug; 139():59-66. PubMed ID: 30980842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumers' choice-blindness to ingredient information.
    Cheung TT; Junghans AF; Dijksterhuis GB; Kroese F; Johansson P; Hall L; De Ridder DT
    Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():2-12. PubMed ID: 26407803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The unit size effect of indulgent food: how eating smaller sized items signals impulsivity and makes consumers eat less.
    van Kleef E; Kavvouris C; van Trijp HC
    Psychol Health; 2014; 29(9):1081-103. PubMed ID: 24678943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts label.
    Dallas SK; Liu PJ; Ubel PA
    Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():577-84. PubMed ID: 26278876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Depicted serving size: cereal packaging pictures exaggerate serving sizes and promote overserving.
    Tal A; Niemann S; Wansink B
    BMC Public Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 28166756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Unit-Dose Packaging Influence Understanding of Serving Size Information for Cannabis Edibles?
    Goodman S; Hammond D
    J Stud Alcohol Drugs; 2020 Mar; 81(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 32359046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restrained Eating and Food Cues: Recent Findings and Conclusions.
    Polivy J; Herman CP
    Curr Obes Rep; 2017 Mar; 6(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 28205156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of brand and caloric information on flavor perception and food consumption in restrained and unrestrained eaters.
    Cavanagh KV; Kruja B; Forestell CA
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():1-7. PubMed ID: 24979333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers.
    Wansink B
    Annu Rev Nutr; 2004; 24():455-79. PubMed ID: 15189128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Portion size effects vary: The size of food units is a bigger problem than the number.
    Vandenbroele J; Van Kerckhove A; Zlatevska N
    Appetite; 2019 Sep; 140():27-40. PubMed ID: 31071355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enhanced behavioral inhibition in restrained eaters.
    Meule A; Lukito S; Vögele C; Kübler A
    Eat Behav; 2011 Apr; 12(2):152-5. PubMed ID: 21385646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Components of attentional bias for food cues among restrained eaters.
    Hollitt S; Kemps E; Tiggemann M; Smeets E; Mills JS
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 20005274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resting metabolic rate in young women classified as restrained or unrestrained eaters.
    Laessle RG; Kikker S
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Oct; 95(3):542-3. PubMed ID: 18675287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of expectations in the effect of food cue exposure on intake.
    Kemps E; Herman CP; Hollitt S; Polivy J; Prichard I; Tiggemann M
    Appetite; 2016 Aug; 103():259-264. PubMed ID: 27120095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temporal attention for visual food stimuli in restrained eaters.
    Neimeijer RA; de Jong PJ; Roefs A
    Appetite; 2013 May; 64():5-11. PubMed ID: 23280401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peak and end effects on remembered enjoyment of eating in low and high restrained eaters.
    Robinson E; Blissett J; Higgs S
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 21570432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. To eat or not to eat? Availability of food modulates the electrocortical response to food pictures in restrained eaters.
    Blechert J; Feige B; Hajcak G; Tuschen-Caffier B
    Appetite; 2010 Apr; 54(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 19931582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.