These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

818 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28035032)

  • 1. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
    Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing single nucleotide variant detection and genotype calling on whole-genome sequenced individuals.
    Cheng AY; Teo YY; Ong RT
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1707-13. PubMed ID: 24558117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Empirical design of a variant quality control pipeline for whole genome sequencing data using replicate discordance.
    Adelson RP; Renton AE; Li W; Barzilai N; Atzmon G; Goate AM; Davies P; Freudenberg-Hua Y
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16156. PubMed ID: 31695094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Toward better understanding of artifacts in variant calling from high-coverage samples.
    Li H
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Oct; 30(20):2843-51. PubMed ID: 24974202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. ReliableGenome: annotation of genomic regions with high/low variant calling concordance.
    Popitsch N; ; Schuh A; Taylor JC
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 27605105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies.
    Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.
    Hwang S; Kim E; Lee I; Marcotte EM
    Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17875. PubMed ID: 26639839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. tarSVM: Improving the accuracy of variant calls derived from microfluidic PCR-based targeted next generation sequencing using a support vector machine.
    Gillies CE; Otto EA; Vega-Warner V; Robertson CC; Sanna-Cherchi S; Gharavi A; Crawford B; Bhimma R; Winkler C; ; ; Kang HM; Sampson MG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):233. PubMed ID: 27287006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): improving the quality of exome variant genotypes.
    Trubetskoy V; Rodriguez A; Dave U; Campbell N; Crawford EL; Cook EH; Sutcliffe JS; Foster I; Madduri R; Cox NJ; Davis LK
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jan; 31(2):187-93. PubMed ID: 25270638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing variant calling algorithms for target-exon sequencing in a large sample.
    Lo Y; Kang HM; Nelson MR; Othman MI; Chissoe SL; Ehm MG; Abecasis GR; Zöllner S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():75. PubMed ID: 25884587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality control and integration of genotypes from two calling pipelines for whole genome sequence data in the Alzheimer's disease sequencing project.
    Naj AC; Lin H; Vardarajan BN; White S; Lancour D; Ma Y; Schmidt M; Sun F; Butkiewicz M; Bush WS; Kunkle BW; Malamon J; Amin N; Choi SH; Hamilton-Nelson KL; van der Lee SJ; Gupta N; Koboldt DC; Saad M; Wang B; Nato AQ; Sohi HK; Kuzma A; ; Wang LS; Cupples LA; van Duijn C; Seshadri S; Schellenberg GD; Boerwinkle E; Bis JC; Dupuis J; Salerno WJ; Wijsman EM; Martin ER; DeStefano AL
    Genomics; 2019 Jul; 111(4):808-818. PubMed ID: 29857119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. iCall: a genotype-calling algorithm for rare, low-frequency and common variants on the Illumina exome array.
    Zhou J; Tantoso E; Wong LP; Ong RT; Bei JX; Li Y; Liu J; Khor CC; Teo YY
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1714-20. PubMed ID: 24567545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
    Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genotype-Corrector: improved genotype calls for genetic mapping in F
    Miao C; Fang J; Li D; Liang P; Zhang X; Yang J; Schnable JC; Tang H
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):10088. PubMed ID: 29973633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Leveraging known genomic variants to improve detection of variants, especially close-by Indels.
    Vo NS; Phan V
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):2918-2926. PubMed ID: 29590294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Archived neonatal dried blood spot samples can be used for accurate whole genome and exome-targeted next-generation sequencing.
    Hollegaard MV; Grauholm J; Nielsen R; Grove J; Mandrup S; Hougaard DM
    Mol Genet Metab; 2013; 110(1-2):65-72. PubMed ID: 23830478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimal sequencing depth design for whole genome re-sequencing in pigs.
    Jiang Y; Jiang Y; Wang S; Zhang Q; Ding X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):556. PubMed ID: 31703550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. geck: trio-based comparative benchmarking of variant calls.
    Kómár P; Kural D
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Oct; 34(20):3488-3495. PubMed ID: 29850774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 41.