These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28035756)

  • 21. Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Hendriks et al.
    Eberhardt WE; Mitchell A; Rami-Porta R
    J Thorac Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11(3):e43-4. PubMed ID: 26922925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Letter to the editor: In reply to Sansone et al.
    Langer T; Pechmann A; Wider S; Kirschner J
    Eur J Paediatr Neurol; 2018 Jul; 22(4):732. PubMed ID: 29628153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reply to the Letter to the Editor from H. Watson et al.
    Shon C; Lee KS; Kim YE; Park SY; Oh IH
    Jpn J Infect Dis; 2016; 69(4):354-5. PubMed ID: 27534718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reply to O. Osibogun's Letter to the Editor Re: Hess S. et al.; Nutrients 2016, 8, 88.
    Hess S; Eichler K
    Nutrients; 2016 Jun; 8(7):. PubMed ID: 27367727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reply to the letter to the editor regarding our article (paganelli et Al., 2010).
    Carrasco AE
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2011 May; 24(5):610-3. PubMed ID: 21428283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reply to Letter to the Editor by Griffiths et al. commenting on Evans & Allen.
    Evans BJW; Allen PM
    J Optom; 2017; 10(3):200-202. PubMed ID: 28499859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reply to M.V. Meng's Letter to the Editor re: H. Baumert et al. The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49:816-9 and P.L. Steinberg et al. re: H. Baumert et al. The use of polymer (Hem-o-lok) clips for management of the renal hilum during laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2006;49:816-9. Eur Urol 2007;51:572-3.
    O'Kane HF; Nambirajan T
    Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1449. PubMed ID: 17229516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reply to the letter to the editor by premchand et al.
    Schwartz L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Oct; 48(2):239B-40A. PubMed ID: 10506793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reply to the letter to the editor by premchand et al.
    Webb J; Chan A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Oct; 48(2):240C-1A. PubMed ID: 10506795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Author's reply: Letter to the editor in response to Akita et al. (2020).
    Akita K; Inohara T; Kohsaka S; Amano T; Ikari Y; Maekawa Y
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother; 2021 May; 7(3):e60. PubMed ID: 32991674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reply to Letter to the Editor by Robertson et al.
    de Pee S
    Matern Child Nutr; 2016 Jul; 12(3):641-2. PubMed ID: 27350271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reply to the letter to the Editor of Marx et al.
    Fedorowski A; Sutton R
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1395. PubMed ID: 30927291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reply to the letter to the editor 'Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in practice of HTA' by Wild et al.
    Cherny NI; Sullivan R; Dafni U; Bogaerts J; Kerst JM; Zielinski C; Piccart MJ; de Vries EG
    Ann Oncol; 2016 Nov; 27(11):2136-2137. PubMed ID: 27573563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Letter to the Editor: Moving science forward by increasing awareness of reporting and citation biases: a reply to Vrshek-Schallhorn et al. (2016).
    de Vries YA; Roest AM; Franzen M; Munafò MR; Bastiaansen JA
    Psychol Med; 2017 Jan; 47(1):183-185. PubMed ID: 27619054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reply to "Letter to the editor in response to the paper by Zuin et al. 2023".
    Zuin M; Rigatelli G; Battisti V; Costola G; Roncon L; Bilato C
    Int J Cardiol; 2023 Apr; 376():26. PubMed ID: 36787868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reply: Commentary on letter to the editor from Drago et al.
    Bitar C; Murina A
    JAAD Case Rep; 2018 Sep; 4(8):817. PubMed ID: 30271871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reply to Letter to the Editor: Biotin supplementation in MS clinically valuable but can alter multiple blood test results by Siddiqui U, et al.
    Tourbah A; Sedel F
    Mult Scler; 2017 Apr; 23(4):620-621. PubMed ID: 27899553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reply to letter to the editor on "A perspective on testing for gestational diabetes mellitus" by Seshiah V et al.
    Mohan V; Nallaperumal S; Anjana RM; Uma R
    Indian J Endocrinol Metab; 2015; 19(6):850-4. PubMed ID: 26693442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reply to Miller et al, Letter to the Editor, Authors.
    Rose D; Heller MC; Roberto CA
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2020 Feb; 52(2):206-208. PubMed ID: 32036999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reply to Miller et al, Letter to the Editor, SNEB.
    Joseph H; Koch P; Seidel M; Steinmetz J; Wilkins J
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2020 Feb; 52(2):208-210. PubMed ID: 32037000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.