192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28035942)
1. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A test case.
Zhou R; Chan AH
Work; 2017; 56(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 28035942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to determine product usability: A proposed theoretical framework.
Zhou R; Chan AH
Work; 2017; 56(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 28035943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationale and Design of a Novel Method to Assess the Usability of Body-Worn Absorbent Incontinence Care Products by Caregivers.
Kanerva Rice S; Pendrill L; Petersson N; Nordlinder J; Farbrot A
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2018; 45(5):456-464. PubMed ID: 30188394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehensive Eutrophication Assessment Based on Fuzzy Matter Element Model and Monte Carlo-Triangular Fuzzy Numbers Approach.
Wang Y; Ran W
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 May; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 31109129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing coastal reclamation suitability based on a fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation framework: A case study of Lianyungang, China.
Feng L; Zhu X; Sun X
Mar Pollut Bull; 2014 Dec; 89(1-2):102-111. PubMed ID: 25455377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Norm-dist Monte-Carlo integrative method for the improvement of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.
Wicaksono FD; Arshad YB; Sihombing H
Heliyon; 2020 Apr; 6(4):e03607. PubMed ID: 32346625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An experimental comparison of fuzzy logic and analytic hierarchy process for medical decision support systems.
Uzoka FM; Obot O; Barker K; Osuji J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2011 Jul; 103(1):10-27. PubMed ID: 20633949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Based AHP and Fuzzy COPRAS for Machine Tool Evaluation.
Nguyen HT; Md Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Aoyama H; Case K
PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0133599. PubMed ID: 26368541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of product conceptual design based on Pythagorean fuzzy set under big data environment.
Ma LD; Wang WX; Xie JW; Zhang N; Hu NF; Wang ZA
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):22387. PubMed ID: 36575300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo approach to fuzzy AHP risk analysis in renewable energy construction projects.
Serrano-Gomez L; Munoz-Hernandez JI
PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0215943. PubMed ID: 31194751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A hybrid approach based on the analytic hierarchy process and 2-tuple hybrid ordered weighted averaging for location selection of distribution centers.
Li S; Wei Z
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206966. PubMed ID: 30408083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fuzzy logic programming and adaptable design of medical products for the COVID-19 anti-epidemic normalization.
Fu YL; Liang KC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105762. PubMed ID: 33011666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance Analysis of Hospital Managers Using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS: Iranian Experience.
Shafii M; Hosseini SM; Arab M; Asgharizadeh E; Farzianpour F
Glob J Health Sci; 2015 Jun; 8(2):137-55. PubMed ID: 26383216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk assessment of groundwater contamination: a multilevel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach based on DRASTIC model.
Zhang Q; Yang X; Zhang Y; Zhong M
ScientificWorldJournal; 2013; 2013():610390. PubMed ID: 24453883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk assessment of supply chain for pharmaceutical excipients with AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
Li M; Du Y; Wang Q; Sun C; Ling X; Yu B; Tu J; Xiong Y
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2016; 42(4):676-84. PubMed ID: 26288999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures.
Promentilla MA; Furuichi T; Ishii K; Tanikawa N
J Environ Manage; 2008 Aug; 88(3):479-95. PubMed ID: 17467879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An approach for environmental risk assessment of engineered nanomaterials using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy inference rules.
Topuz E; van Gestel CA
Environ Int; 2016; 92-93():334-47. PubMed ID: 27131016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development of interval-valued fuzzy GRA with SERVPERF based on subjective and objective weights for evaluation of airline service quality: A case study of Korea low-cost carriers.
Lee S; Kang D
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0219739. PubMed ID: 31386667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk assessment of supply chain for pharmaceutical excipients with AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.
Li M; Du Y; Wang Q; Sun C; Ling X; Yu B; Tu J; Xiong Y
Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2016 Apr; 42(4):676-684. PubMed ID: 26266963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
