These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28035942)

  • 21. Monte Carlo approach to fuzzy AHP risk analysis in renewable energy construction projects.
    Serrano-Gomez L; Munoz-Hernandez JI
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0215943. PubMed ID: 31194751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Facility Layout Planning with SHELL and Fuzzy AHP Method Based on Human Reliability for Operating Theatre.
    Lin Q; Wang D
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():8563528. PubMed ID: 30792832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A usability assessment of riding lawn-mowing equipment with varying levels of design standards compliance.
    Deng Y; Shirley J; Rose T; Geary L; Feltner D; Chen K; Hoyle J; Dutt M; Kaber DB
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():76-85. PubMed ID: 31046962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An approach to estimating product design time based on fuzzy v-support vector machine.
    Yan HS; Xu D
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2007 May; 18(3):721-31. PubMed ID: 17526339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Application of fuzzy logic techniques for the qualitative interpretation of preferences in a collective questionnaire for users of wheelchairs.
    Lafuente R; Page A; Sánchez-Lacuesta J; Tortosa L
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 9505257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based risk priority number for risk assessments of commissioning process of a ring gantry LINAC.
    Chang J; Jang S; Lalonde R; Huq SM
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 23(11):e13760. PubMed ID: 35998202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A methodology for evaluating the usability of audiovisual consumer electronic products.
    Kwahk J; Han SH
    Appl Ergon; 2002 Sep; 33(5):419-31. PubMed ID: 12236651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A hybrid mathematical programming model for optimal project portfolio selection using fuzzy inference system and analytic hierarchy process.
    Tavana M; Khosrojerdi G; Mina H; Rahman A
    Eval Program Plann; 2019 Dec; 77():101703. PubMed ID: 31442587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Fuzzy decision analysis for integrated environmental vulnerability assessment of the mid-Atlantic Region.
    Tran LT; Knight CG; O'Neill RV; Smith ER; Riitters KH; Wickham J
    Environ Manage; 2002 Jun; 29(6):845-59. PubMed ID: 11992175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Fuzzy Comprehensive CS-SVR Model-based health status evaluation of radar.
    Yang Y; Zhang M; Dai Y
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213833. PubMed ID: 30883585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using fuzzy logic analysis for siting decisions of infiltration trenches for highway runoff control.
    Ki SJ; Ray C
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Sep; 493():44-53. PubMed ID: 24937491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An integrated design concept evaluation model based on interval valued picture fuzzy set and improved GRP method.
    Ma Q; Chen Z; Tan Y; Wei J
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8433. PubMed ID: 38600113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A combination of extended fuzzy AHP and fuzzy GRA for government E-tendering in hybrid fuzzy environment.
    Wang Y; Xi C; Zhang S; Yu D; Zhang W; Li Y
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():123675. PubMed ID: 25057506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A hybrid Pythagorean fuzzy AHP - CoCoSo framework to rank the performance outcomes of circular supply chain due to adoption of its enablers.
    Lahane S; Kant R
    Waste Manag; 2021 Jul; 130():48-60. PubMed ID: 34049267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A novel hybrid evaluation framework for public organizations based on employees' performance factors.
    Afrasiabi A; Chalmardi MK; Balezentis T
    Eval Program Plann; 2022 Apr; 91():102020. PubMed ID: 34716020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of the usability of a nutritional epidemiology computerized system.
    Ruggeri BF; Voci SM; Borges CA; Slater B
    Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 16(4):966-75. PubMed ID: 24896601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Wastewater treatment evaluation for enterprises based on fuzzy-AHP comprehensive evaluation: a case study in industrial park in Taihu Basin, China.
    Hu W; Liu G; Tu Y
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):907. PubMed ID: 28443215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of multiple environmental factors for swine building assessment and control.
    Xie Q; Ni JQ; Su Z
    J Hazard Mater; 2017 Oct; 340():463-471. PubMed ID: 28759867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development of a framework for resilience measurement: Suggestion of fuzzy Resilience Grade (RG) and fuzzy Resilience Early Warning Grade (REWG).
    Omidvar M; Mazloumi A; Mohammad Fam I; Nirumand F
    Work; 2017; 56(3):463-474. PubMed ID: 28269808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.