532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28036406)
1. Winner's Curse Correction and Variable Thresholding Improve Performance of Polygenic Risk Modeling Based on Genome-Wide Association Study Summary-Level Data.
Shi J; Park JH; Duan J; Berndt ST; Moy W; Yu K; Song L; Wheeler W; Hua X; Silverman D; Garcia-Closas M; Hsiung CA; Figueroa JD; Cortessis VK; Malats N; Karagas MR; Vineis P; Chang IS; Lin D; Zhou B; Seow A; Matsuo K; Hong YC; Caporaso NE; Wolpin B; Jacobs E; Petersen GM; Klein AP; Li D; Risch H; Sanders AR; Hsu L; Schoen RE; Brenner H; ; ; ; ; ; ; Stolzenberg-Solomon R; Gejman P; Lan Q; Rothman N; Amundadottir LT; Landi MT; Levinson DF; Chanock SJ; Chatterjee N
PLoS Genet; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1006493. PubMed ID: 28036406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accurate modeling of replication rates in genome-wide association studies by accounting for Winner's Curse and study-specific heterogeneity.
Zou J; Zhou J; Faller S; Brown RP; Sankararaman SS; Eskin E
G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 36250793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Review and further developments in statistical corrections for Winner's Curse in genetic association studies.
Forde A; Hemani G; Ferguson J
PLoS Genet; 2023 Sep; 19(9):e1010546. PubMed ID: 37721937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization.
Jiang T; Gill D; Butterworth AS; Burgess S
Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Aug; 52(4):1209-1219. PubMed ID: 36573802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficient Implementation of Penalized Regression for Genetic Risk Prediction.
Privé F; Aschard H; Blum MGB
Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 30808621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing for polygenic effects in genome-wide association studies.
Pan W; Chen YM; Wei P
Genet Epidemiol; 2015 May; 39(4):306-16. PubMed ID: 25847094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining common genetic variants and non-genetic risk factors to predict risk of cutaneous melanoma.
Gu F; Chen TH; Pfeiffer RM; Fargnoli MC; Calista D; Ghiorzo P; Peris K; Puig S; Menin C; De Nicolo A; Rodolfo M; Pellegrini C; Pastorino L; Evangelou E; Zhang T; Hua X; DellaValle CT; Timothy Bishop D; MacGregor S; Iles MI; Law MH; Cust A; Brown KM; Stratigos AJ; Nagore E; Chanock S; Shi J; Consortium MM; Consortium M; Landi MT
Hum Mol Genet; 2018 Dec; 27(23):4145-4156. PubMed ID: 30060076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A flexible genome-wide bootstrap method that accounts for ranking and threshold-selection bias in GWAS interpretation and replication study design.
Faye LL; Sun L; Dimitromanolakis A; Bull SB
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1898-912. PubMed ID: 21538984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the total number of susceptibility variants underlying complex diseases from genome-wide association studies.
So HC; Yip BH; Sham PC
PLoS One; 2010 Nov; 5(11):e13898. PubMed ID: 21103334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On polygenic risk scores for complex traits prediction.
Zhao B; Zou F
Biometrics; 2022 Jun; 78(2):499-511. PubMed ID: 33786811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors.
Ge T; Chen CY; Ni Y; Feng YA; Smoller JW
Nat Commun; 2019 Apr; 10(1):1776. PubMed ID: 30992449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Power, false discovery rate and Winner's Curse in eQTL studies.
Huang QQ; Ritchie SC; Brozynska M; Inouye M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Dec; 46(22):e133. PubMed ID: 30189032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. POLARIS: Polygenic LD-adjusted risk score approach for set-based analysis of GWAS data.
Baker E; Schmidt KM; Sims R; O'Donovan MC; Williams J; Holmans P; Escott-Price V; Consortium WTG
Genet Epidemiol; 2018 Jun; 42(4):366-377. PubMed ID: 29532500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical correction of the Winner's Curse explains replication variability in quantitative trait genome-wide association studies.
Palmer C; Pe'er I
PLoS Genet; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1006916. PubMed ID: 28715421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Leveraging effect size distributions to improve polygenic risk scores derived from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies.
Song S; Jiang W; Hou L; Zhao H
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Feb; 16(2):e1007565. PubMed ID: 32045423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tuning parameters for polygenic risk score methods using GWAS summary statistics from training data.
Jiang W; Chen L; Girgenti MJ; Zhao H
Nat Commun; 2024 Jan; 15(1):24. PubMed ID: 38169469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polygenic risk and hazard scores for Alzheimer's disease prediction.
Leonenko G; Sims R; Shoai M; Frizzati A; Bossù P; Spalletta G; Fox NC; Williams J; ; Hardy J; Escott-Price V
Ann Clin Transl Neurol; 2019 Mar; 6(3):456-465. PubMed ID: 30911569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations.
Ruan Y; Lin YF; Feng YA; Chen CY; Lam M; Guo Z; ; He L; Sawa A; Martin AR; Qin S; Huang H; Ge T
Nat Genet; 2022 May; 54(5):573-580. PubMed ID: 35513724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interval estimate of causal effect in summary data based Mendelian randomization in the presence of winner's curse.
Wang K
Genet Epidemiol; 2024 Mar; 48(2):74-84. PubMed ID: 38282283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-parametric Polygenic Risk Prediction via Partitioned GWAS Summary Statistics.
Chun S; Imakaev M; Hui D; Patsopoulos NA; Neale BM; Kathiresan S; Stitziel NO; Sunyaev SR
Am J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 107(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 32470373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
