BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28038458)

  • 1. Chromosome nondisjunction during bipolar mitoses of binucleated intermediates promote aneuploidy formation along with multipolar mitoses rather than chromosome loss in micronuclei induced by asbestos.
    Zhang T; Lv L; Huang Y; Ren X; Shi Q
    Oncotarget; 2017 Feb; 8(7):11030-11041. PubMed ID: 28038458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Chromosome nondisjunction yields tetraploid rather than aneuploid cells in human cell lines.
    Shi Q; King RW
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7061):1038-42. PubMed ID: 16222248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chromosome loss caused by DNA fragmentation induced in main nuclei and micronuclei of human lymphoblastoid cells treated with colcemid.
    Yamamoto M; Wakata A; Aoki Y; Miyamae Y; Kodama S
    Mutat Res; 2014 Apr; 762():10-6. PubMed ID: 24582839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cell biology: nondisjunction, aneuploidy and tetraploidy.
    Weaver BA; Silk AD; Cleveland DW
    Nature; 2006 Aug; 442(7104):E9-10; discussion E10. PubMed ID: 16915240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tetraploid cells from cytokinesis failure induce aneuploidy and spontaneous transformation of mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells.
    Lv L; Zhang T; Yi Q; Huang Y; Wang Z; Hou H; Zhang H; Zheng W; Hao Q; Guo Z; Cooke HJ; Shi Q
    Cell Cycle; 2012 Aug; 11(15):2864-75. PubMed ID: 22801546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Okadaic acid: chromosomal non-disjunction analysis in human lymphocytes and study of aneugenic pathway in CHO-K1 cells.
    Hégarat LL; Orsière T; Botta A; Fessard V
    Mutat Res; 2005 Oct; 578(1-2):53-63. PubMed ID: 15885711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micronuclei, centromere-positive micronuclei and chromosome nondisjunction in cytokinesis blocked human lymphocytes following mitomycin C or vincristine treatment.
    Sgura A; Antoccia A; Ramirez MJ; Marcos R; Tanzarella C; Degrassi F
    Mutat Res; 1997 Aug; 392(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 9269334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cytokinesis failure and successful multipolar mitoses drive aneuploidy in glioblastoma cells.
    Telentschak S; Soliwoda M; Nohroudi K; Addicks K; Klinz FJ
    Oncol Rep; 2015 Apr; 33(4):2001-8. PubMed ID: 25625503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chromosome nondisjunction and loss induced by protons and X rays in primary human fibroblasts: role of centromeres in aneuploidy.
    Sgura A; Antoccia A; Cherubini R; Tanzarella C
    Radiat Res; 2001 Sep; 156(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 11500131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sex chromosome loss and non-disjunction in women: analysis of chromosomal segregation in binucleated lymphocytes.
    Zijno A; Leopardi P; Marcon F; Crebelli R
    Chromosoma; 1996 Mar; 104(6):461-7. PubMed ID: 8601341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increased nondisjunction of chromosome 21 with age in human peripheral lymphocytes.
    Shi Q; Chen J; Adler I; Zhang J; Martin R; Pan S; Zhang X; Shan X
    Mutat Res; 2000 Jul; 452(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 10894887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. From the Cover: Does the Assessment of Nondisjunction Provide a More Sensitive Assay for the Detection of Aneugens?
    Elloway JM; Davies AK; Hayes JE; Doherty AT
    Toxicol Sci; 2017 May; 157(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 28087838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of chromosome loss and non-disjunction in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes of 24 male subjects.
    Carere A; Antoccia A; Cimini D; Crebelli R; Degrassi F; Leopardi P; Marcon F; Sgura A; Tanzarella C; Zijno A
    Mutagenesis; 1999 Sep; 14(5):491-6. PubMed ID: 10473653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When the genome plays dice: circumvention of the spindle assembly checkpoint and near-random chromosome segregation in multipolar cancer cell mitoses.
    Gisselsson D; Håkanson U; Stoller P; Marti D; Jin Y; Rosengren AH; Stewénius Y; Kahl F; Panagopoulos I
    PLoS One; 2008 Apr; 3(4):e1871. PubMed ID: 18392149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spontaneous and spindle poison-induced micronuclei and chromosome non-disjunction in cytokinesis-blocked lymphocytes from two age groups of women.
    Bakou K; Stephanou G; Andrianopoulos C; Demopoulos NA
    Mutagenesis; 2002 May; 17(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 11971995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preferential occurrence of chromosome 21 malsegregation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of Alzheimer disease patients.
    Migliore L; Botto N; Scarpato R; Petrozzi L; Cipriani G; Bonuccelli U
    Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1999; 87(1-2):41-6. PubMed ID: 10640809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of age and gender on micronucleus and chromosome nondisjunction frequencies in centenarians and younger subjects.
    Wojda A; Zietkiewicz E; Witt M
    Mutagenesis; 2007 May; 22(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 17284771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Chromosome segregation defects contribute to aneuploidy in normal neural progenitor cells.
    Yang AH; Kaushal D; Rehen SK; Kriedt K; Kingsbury MA; McConnell MJ; Chun J
    J Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 23(32):10454-62. PubMed ID: 14614104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of chromosome segregation in cytokinesis-blocked human lymphocytes: non-disjunction is the prevalent damage resulting from low dose exposure to spindle poisons.
    Zijno A; Marcon F; Leopardi P; Crebelli R
    Mutagenesis; 1996 Jul; 11(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 8671757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of chromosome loss and gain induced by griseofulvin, estramustine, and vanadate in binucleated lymphocytes using FISH analysis.
    Migliore L; Zotti-Martelli L; Scarpato R
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 1999; 34(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 10462727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.