These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28038900)
1. Validation of the QuickDASH and DASH in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures Through Agreement Analysis. Tsang P; Walton D; Grewal R; MacDermid J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 98(6):1217-1222.e1. PubMed ID: 28038900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of the QuickDASH in patients with shoulder-related disorders undergoing surgery. Macdermid JC; Khadilkar L; Birmingham TB; Athwal GS J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 45(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 25394688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. Gummesson C; Ward MM; Atroshi I BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2006 May; 7():44. PubMed ID: 16709254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of six outcome measures across the recovery period after distal radius fixation-Which to use and when? Fang C; Fang E; Yee DK; Kwan K; Leung G; Leung F J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021; 29(1):2309499020971866. PubMed ID: 33509054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Spanish version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation outcome measure: cross-cultural adaptation process, reliability, measurement error and construct validity. Rosales RS; García-Gutierrez R; Reboso-Morales L; Atroshi I Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Aug; 15(1):169. PubMed ID: 28836994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QuickDASH and PRWE Are Not Optimal Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Distal Radial Fracture Due to Ceiling Effect: Potential Implications for Future Research. Bell KR; Oliver WM; White TO; Molyneux SG; Clement ND; Duckworth AD J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2023 Aug; 105(16):1270-1279. PubMed ID: 37399255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation. Kim JK; Kang JS J Hand Ther; 2013; 26(3):238-43; quiz 244. PubMed ID: 23453368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire. Imaeda T; Toh S; Wada T; Uchiyama S; Okinaga S; Kusunose K; Sawaizumi T; J Orthop Sci; 2006 May; 11(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 16721524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. Imaeda T; Uchiyama S; Wada T; Okinaga S; Sawaizumi T; Omokawa S; Momose T; Moritomo H; Gotani H; Abe Y; Nishida J; Kanaya F; J Orthop Sci; 2010 Jul; 15(4):509-17. PubMed ID: 20721719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation and Validation of the Finnish Version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire (PRWE) in Patients with Acute Distal Radius Fracture. Sandelin H; Jalanko T; Huhtala H; Lassila H; Haapala J; Helkamaa T Scand J Surg; 2016 Sep; 105(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 26503440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring Outcomes Over Time in Distal Radius Fractures: A Comparison of Generic, Upper Extremity-Specific and Wrist-Specific Outcome Measures. Cheema AS; O'Brien PJ; Broekhuyse HM; Lefaivre KA J Hand Surg Glob Online; 2020 Sep; 2(5):272-276. PubMed ID: 35415515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation outcome questionnaire: good responsiveness, validity, and reliability, in 99 patients recovering from a fracture of the distal radius. Wilcke MT; Abbaszadegan H; Adolphson PY Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg; 2009; 43(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 19308860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Which measure should be used to assess the patient's functional outcome after distal radius fracture? Gupta S; Halai M; Al-Maiyah M; Muller S Acta Orthop Belg; 2014 Mar; 80(1):116-8. PubMed ID: 24873095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of DASH and QuickDASH with measures of psychological distress. Niekel MC; Lindenhovius AL; Watson JB; Vranceanu AM; Ring D J Hand Surg Am; 2009 Oct; 34(8):1499-505. PubMed ID: 19703733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity and reliability of the Turkish "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire. Öztürk Ö; Sarı Z; Özgül B; Taşyıkan L Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 26012931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders. Fayad F; Lefevre-Colau MM; Gautheron V; Macé Y; Fermanian J; Mayoux-Benhamou A; Roren A; Rannou F; Roby-Brami A; Revel M; Poiraudeau S Man Ther; 2009 Apr; 14(2):206-12. PubMed ID: 18436467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis. Hammond A; Prior Y; Tyson S BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Apr; 19(1):118. PubMed ID: 29661183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The risk of adverse outcomes in extra-articular distal radius fractures is increased with malalignment in patients of all ages but mitigated in older patients. Grewal R; MacDermid JC J Hand Surg Am; 2007 Sep; 32(7):962-70. PubMed ID: 17826547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. Gabel CP; Yelland M; Melloh M; Burkett B BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2009 Dec; 10():161. PubMed ID: 20021677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Efficiency of Patient-Reported Outcome Collection: Application of Computerized Adaptive Testing to DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Scores. Kane LT; Abboud JA; Plummer OR; Beredjiklian PT J Hand Surg Am; 2021 Apr; 46(4):278-286. PubMed ID: 33342614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]