1051 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28038902)
1. Long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diedrich JT; Klein DA; Peipert JF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):364.e1-364.e12. PubMed ID: 28038902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-acting reversible contraceptive acceptability and unintended pregnancy among women presenting for short-acting methods: a randomized patient preference trial.
Hubacher D; Spector H; Monteith C; Chen PL; Hart C
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 216(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 27662799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Initiation and continuation of long-acting reversible contraception in the United States military healthcare system.
Chiles DP; Roberts TA; Klein DA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):328.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27005514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device and implant program outcomes: a prospective analysis.
Eggebroten JL; Sanders JN; Turok DK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):51.e1-51.e7. PubMed ID: 28342716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrauterine Contraception Continuation in Adolescents and Young Women: A Systematic Review.
Usinger KM; Gola SB; Weis M; Smaldone A
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 29(6):659-667. PubMed ID: 27386754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expanding long-acting contraceptive options: a prospective cohort study of the hormonal intrauterine device, copper intrauterine device, and implants in Nigeria and Zambia.
Brunie A; Stankevitz K; Nwala AA; Nqumayo M; Chen M; Danna K; Afolabi K; Rademacher KH
Lancet Glob Health; 2021 Oct; 9(10):e1431-e1441. PubMed ID: 34474001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: systematic review with meta-analyses.
Schmidt-Hansen M; Hawkins JE; Lord J; Williams K; Lohr PA; Hasler E; Cameron S
Hum Reprod Update; 2020 Feb; 26(2):141-160. PubMed ID: 32096862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.
Brunson MR; Klein DA; Olsen CH; Weir LF; Roberts TA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):55.e1-55.e9. PubMed ID: 28257962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 3 of 4): Chapter 7--Intrauterine Contraception.
Black A; Guilbert E; Costescu D; Dunn S; Fisher W; Kives S; Mirosh M; Norman W; Pymar H; Reid R; Roy G; Varto H; Waddington A; Wagner MS; Whelan AM; Mansouri S
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):182-222. PubMed ID: 27032746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Six-month and 1-year continuation rates following postpartum insertion of implants and intrauterine devices.
Woo I; Seifert S; Hendricks D; Jamshidi RM; Burke AE; Fox MC
Contraception; 2015 Dec; 92(6):532-5. PubMed ID: 26408376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices.
Cohen R; Sheeder J; Arango N; Teal SB; Tocce K
Contraception; 2016 Feb; 93(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 26475368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.
Tang JH; Lopez LM; Mody S; Grimes DA
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD009805. PubMed ID: 23152281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-year continuation of intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants in a mixed-payer setting: a retrospective review.
Sanders JN; Turok DK; Gawron LM; Law A; Wen L; Lynen R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 216(6):590.e1-590.e8. PubMed ID: 28188772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The safety of intrauterine devices among young women: a systematic review.
Jatlaoui TC; Riley HEM; Curtis KM
Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):17-39. PubMed ID: 27771475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.
Peipert JF; Zhao Q; Allsworth JE; Petrosky E; Madden T; Eisenberg D; Secura G
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 117(5):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 21508749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception.
O'Neil-Callahan M; Peipert JF; Zhao Q; Madden T; Secura G
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 122(5):1083-1091. PubMed ID: 24104781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two year continuation rates of contraceptive methods in France: a cohort study from the French national health insurance database.
Agostini A; Godard C; Laurendeau C; Benmahmoud Zoubir A; Lafuma A; Lévy-Bachelot L; Gourmelen J; Linet T
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2018 Dec; 23(6):421-426. PubMed ID: 30499732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acceptability of immediate postpartum and post-abortion long-acting reversible contraception provision to adolescents: A systematic review.
Buckingham P; Moulton JE; Subasinghe AK; Amos N; Mazza D
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Apr; 100(4):629-640. PubMed ID: 33608901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Familiarity and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception and contraceptive choice.
Paul R; Huysman BC; Maddipati R; Madden T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4S):S884.e1-S884.e9. PubMed ID: 31838124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three-year continuation of reversible contraception.
Diedrich JT; Zhao Q; Madden T; Secura GM; Peipert JF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):662.e1-8. PubMed ID: 26259905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
