BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2803910)

  • 1. Natural history of cervical neoplasia: consistent results obtained by an identification technique.
    Gustafsson L; Adami HO
    Br J Cancer; 1989 Jul; 60(1):132-41. PubMed ID: 2803910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Sweden evaluated by identification and simulation.
    Gustafsson L; Adami HO
    Br J Cancer; 1990 Jun; 61(6):903-8. PubMed ID: 2372495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [In situ and invasive cervical cancer epidemiology in the province of Girona, Spain 1990-2004: incidence, mortality, survival and screening history].
    Castro Marqueta P; Moreno-Crespi J; Buxó-Pujolràs M; Cervantes-Amat M; Pérez-Gómez B; Marcos-Gragera R
    Med Clin (Barc); 2011 Feb; 136(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 21051058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of preinvasive cancer of the cervix and the subsequent reduction in invasive cancer.
    Bergström R; Adami HO; Gustafsson L; Pontén J; Sparén P
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1993 Jul; 85(13):1050-7. PubMed ID: 8515491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of screening for cervical cancer in Sweden: trends in incidence and mortality 1958-1980.
    Pettersson F; Björkholm E; Näslund I
    Int J Epidemiol; 1985 Dec; 14(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 4086138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
    Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Duration of preclinical cervical cancer and reduction in incidence of invasive cancer following negative pap smears.
    van Oortmarssen GJ; Habbema JD
    Int J Epidemiol; 1995 Apr; 24(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 7635589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mass screening in Sweden for cancer of the uterine cervix: effect on incidence and mortality. An overview.
    Kjellgren O
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1986; 22(2):57-63. PubMed ID: 3770533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Cytological and epidemiological aspects of cancer of the uterine cervix. Comparison of the in situ and the invasive types].
    del Ponce M; Sariol H; Rodríguez N; Javech C; Vadés Vivó P
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1976 Jun; 39(236):477-83. PubMed ID: 947830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Trends in the incidence of in situ and invasive cervical cancer by age group and histological type in Korea from 1993 to 2009.
    Oh CM; Jung KW; Won YJ; Shin A; Kong HJ; Jun JK; Park SY
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72012. PubMed ID: 23977194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mathematical models and natural history in cervical cancer screening.
    Prorok PC
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):185-98. PubMed ID: 3570404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales.
    Parkin DM; Nguyen-Dinh X; Day NE
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1985 Feb; 92(2):150-7. PubMed ID: 3970894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Incidence trends in invasive uterine cervix cancer and carcinoma in situ in Incheon, South Korea.
    Boo YK; Kim WC; Lee HY; Leem JH; Lee MH; Leem JS
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(8):1985-8. PubMed ID: 22292638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of cytological screening on cervical neoplasia in the Italian province of Varese.
    Gatta G; Bottini GM; Lampertico P; Sant M; Lualdi M; Berrino F
    Tumori; 1992 Oct; 78(5):295-9. PubMed ID: 1494803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Papanicolaou smear screening and cervical cancer. What can you expect?
    Stenkvist B; Bergström R; Eklund G; Fox CH
    JAMA; 1984 Sep; 252(11):1423-6. PubMed ID: 6471269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of cervical screening after age 60 years according to screening history: Nationwide cohort study in Sweden.
    Wang J; Andrae B; Sundström K; Ploner A; Ström P; Elfström KM; Dillner J; Sparén P
    PLoS Med; 2017 Oct; 14(10):e1002414. PubMed ID: 29065127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The epidemiology of cervical neoplasia.
    La Vecchia C
    Biomed Pharmacother; 1985; 39(8):426-33. PubMed ID: 3841750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical carcinoma on the basis of their frequency in the Province of Trieste (1977-1986).
    Di Bonito L; Delendi M; Patriarca S; Quaranta M; Alberico S; Facca MC
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1989; 10(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 2721523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Limited education as a risk factor in cervical cancer.
    Corral F; Cueva P; Yépez J; Montes E
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1996 Dec; 30(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 9041743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix: sensitivity of detection by cervical smear: will cytologic screening for adenocarcinoma in situ reduce incidence rates for adenocarcinoma.
    Smith HO; Padilla LA
    Cancer; 2002 Dec; 96(6):319-22. PubMed ID: 12478677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.