These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28039996)

  • 21. Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.
    Loizou PC; Hu Y; Litovsky R; Yu G; Peters R; Lake J; Roland P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):372-83. PubMed ID: 19173424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of synchronized linked band selection on speech intelligibility of bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Gajecki T; Nogueira W
    Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 396():108051. PubMed ID: 32861177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Binaural pre-processing for contralateral sound field attenuation can improve speech-in-noise intelligibility for bilateral hearing-aid users.
    San-Victoriano FM; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Hear Res; 2023 May; 432():108743. PubMed ID: 37003080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pre- and Postoperative Binaural Unmasking for Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JGW
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):554-567. PubMed ID: 28301390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Better-ear glimpsing with symmetrically-placed interferers in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    Hu H; Dietz M; Williges B; Ewert SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2128. PubMed ID: 29716260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The benefit of bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation to speech intelligibility in noise.
    Culling JF; Jelfs S; Talbert A; Grange JA; Backhouse SS
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):673-82. PubMed ID: 22717687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; Dingemanse JG; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff MP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29936510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of Masker Head Orientation, Listener Age, and Extended High-Frequency Sensitivity on Speech Recognition in Spatially Separated Speech.
    Braza MD; Corbin NE; Buss E; Monson BB
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):90-100. PubMed ID: 34260434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Efficient Adaptive Speech Reception Threshold Measurements Using Stochastic Approximation Algorithms.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216520919199. PubMed ID: 32425135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH; Stecker GC
    Hear Res; 2020 May; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Perception of speech produced by native and nonnative talkers by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants.
    Ji C; Galvin JJ; Chang YP; Xu A; Fu QJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):532-54. PubMed ID: 24686901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interleaved Acoustic Environments: Impact of an Auditory Scene Classification Procedure on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Eichenauer A; Baumann U; Stöver T; Weissgerber T
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211014118. PubMed ID: 34028332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tyler RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Mar; 113(3):1617-30. PubMed ID: 12656396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The benefit of head orientation to speech intelligibility in noise.
    Grange JA; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):703-12. PubMed ID: 26936554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Audio-visual speech intelligibility benefits with bilateral cochlear implants when talker location varies.
    van Hoesel RJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Apr; 16(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 25582430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial Release From Informational and Energetic Masking in Bimodal and Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    D'Onofrio K; Richards V; Gifford R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov; 63(11):3816-3833. PubMed ID: 33049147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
    Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of Lombard perturbation on speech intelligibility in noise for normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Saba JN; Hansen JHL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Feb; 151(2):1007. PubMed ID: 35232065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Krawczyk-Becker M; Marquardt D; Herzke T; Coleman G; Adiloğlu K; Bomke K; Plotz K; Gerkmann T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.