These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040002)

  • 1. Occlusion effect on compensatory formant production and voice amplitude in response to real-time perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4017. PubMed ID: 28040002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of vowel perceptual cues in compensatory responses to perturbations of speech auditory feedback.
    Reilly KJ; Dougherty KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1314-23. PubMed ID: 23927128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Formant compensation for auditory feedback with English vowels.
    Mitsuya T; MacDonald EN; Munhall KG; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):413-24. PubMed ID: 26233040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Language dependent vowel representation in speech production.
    Mitsuya T; Samson F; Ménard L; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):2993-3003. PubMed ID: 23654403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compensations in response to real-time formant perturbations of different magnitudes.
    MacDonald EN; Goldberg R; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):1059-68. PubMed ID: 20136227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensorimotor adaptation to feedback perturbations of vowel acoustics and its relation to perception.
    Villacorta VM; Perkell JS; Guenther FH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2306-19. PubMed ID: 17902866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cross-language study of compensation in response to real-time formant perturbation.
    Mitsuya T; Macdonald EN; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2978-86. PubMed ID: 22087926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of Polish Vowels of Tracheoesophageal Speakers.
    Mięsikowska M
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):263.e5-263.e11. PubMed ID: 27160042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audio-vocal responses of vocal fundamental frequency and formant during sustained vowel vocalizations in different noises.
    Lee SH; Hsiao TY; Lee GS
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():1-6. PubMed ID: 25749240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modulation of auditory-motor learning in response to formant perturbation as a function of delayed auditory feedback.
    Mitsuya T; Munhall KG; Purcell DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2758. PubMed ID: 28464659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vowel acoustics in adults with apraxia of speech.
    Jacks A; Mathes KA; Marquardt TP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 20008683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Talkers alter vowel production in response to real-time formant perturbation even when instructed not to compensate.
    Munhall KG; MacDonald EN; Byrne SK; Johnsrude I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jan; 125(1):384-90. PubMed ID: 19173425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Response patterns to vowel formant perturbations in children.
    Cheung ST; Thompson K; Chen JL; Yunusova Y; Beal DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2647. PubMed ID: 34717445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formant characteristics of vowels produced by Mandarin esophageal speakers.
    Liu H; Ng ML
    J Voice; 2009 Mar; 23(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 18082365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compensation following real-time manipulation of formants in isolated vowels.
    Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2288-97. PubMed ID: 16642842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The vowel inherent spectral change of English vowels spoken by native and non-native speakers.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL363-9. PubMed ID: 23656095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy.
    Whitehill TL; Ciocca V; Chan JC; Samman N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):135-40. PubMed ID: 16428229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multimodal standardization of voice among four multicultural populations formant structures.
    Andrianopoulos MV; Darrow K; Chen J
    J Voice; 2001 Mar; 15(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 12269636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perturbing the consistency of auditory feedback in speech.
    Nault DR; Mitsuya T; Purcell DW; Munhall KG
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():905365. PubMed ID: 36092651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compensatory Responses to Formant Perturbations Proportionally Decrease as Perturbations Increase.
    Daliri A; Chao SC; Fitzgerald LC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Oct; 63(10):3392-3407. PubMed ID: 32976078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.