These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040024)

  • 1. Optimized single-number quantity for rating the airborne sound insulation of constructions: Living sounds.
    Virjonen P; Hongisto V; Oliva D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4428. PubMed ID: 28040024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimized reference spectrum for rating the façade sound insulation.
    Virjonen P; Hongisto V; Mäkelä MM; Pahikkala T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3107. PubMed ID: 33261368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Subjective and objective rating of the sound insulation of residential building façades against road traffic noise.
    Hongisto V; Oliva D; Rekola L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):1100. PubMed ID: 30180704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimized reference spectrum for rating the impact sound insulation of concrete floors.
    Kylliäinen M; Virjonen P; Hongisto V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jan; 145(1):407. PubMed ID: 30710933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Indoor sound level spectra of public entertainment premises for rating airborne sound insulation.
    Dimitrijević SM; Mijić MM; Šumarac Pavlović DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Mar; 147(3):EL215. PubMed ID: 32237838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The annoyance of snoring and psychoacoustic parameters: a step towards an objective measurement.
    Rohrmeier C; Herzog M; Haubner F; Kuehnel TS
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 269(5):1537-43. PubMed ID: 22167475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in Psychoacoustic Recognition and Brain Activity by Types of Fire Alarm.
    You S; Han W; Jang HJ; Noh GY
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 33440710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the suitability of ISO 16717-1 reference spectra for rating airborne sound insulation.
    Mašović DB; Pavlović DS; Mijić MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL420-5. PubMed ID: 24181985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an auditory emotion recognition function using psychoacoustic parameters based on the International Affective Digitized Sounds.
    Choi Y; Lee S; Jung S; Choi IM; Park YK; Kim C
    Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1076-1084. PubMed ID: 25319038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Annoyance penalty of periodically amplitude-modulated wide-band sound.
    Virjonen P; Hongisto V; Radun J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4159. PubMed ID: 31893749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets.
    Di G; Lu K; Shi X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 29518036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Subjective and objective rating of spectrally different pseudorandom noises--implications for speech masking design.
    Hongisto V; Oliva D; Rekola L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Mar; 137(3):1344-55. PubMed ID: 25786947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustical and perceptual assessment of water sounds and their use over road traffic noise.
    Galbrun L; Ali TT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 23297897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.