144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2804008)
1. Cytological status and lesion size: a further dimension in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Jarmulowicz MR; Jenkins D; Barton SE; Goodall AL; Hollingworth A; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1061-6. PubMed ID: 2804008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The correlation between the grade of dyskaryosis on cervical smear, grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on punch biopsy and the final histological diagnosis on cone biopsies of the cervix.
Heatley MK; Bury JP
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 9577735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cytological detection of persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after local ablative treatment: a comparison of sampling devices.
Hughes RG; Haddad NG; Smart GE; Colquhoun M; McGoogan E; MacIntyre CC; Prescott RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jun; 99(6):498-502. PubMed ID: 1637767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Anderson D; Kitchener HC; Mann EM; Campbell M; Fisher P; Walker F; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1994 May; 308(6941):1399-403. PubMed ID: 8019248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria?
Anderson DJ; Flannelly GM; Kitchener HC; Fisher PM; Mann EM; Campbell MK; Templeton A
BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6845):84-7. PubMed ID: 1638252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CIN 3: the role of lesion size in invasion.
Tidbury P; Singer A; Jenkins D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jul; 99(7):583-6. PubMed ID: 1525100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Four and a half year follow up of women with dyskaryotic cervical smears.
Fletcher A; Metaxas N; Grubb C; Chamberlain J
BMJ; 1990 Sep; 301(6753):641-4. PubMed ID: 2224218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determinants of high-grade dysplasia among women with mild dyskaryosis on cervical smear.
Parazzini F; Sideri M; Restelli S; Schettino F; Chatenoud L; Crosignani PG
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 86(5):754-7. PubMed ID: 7566843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human papillomavirus detection in cervical lesions nondiagnostic for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with Papanicolaou smear, colposcopy, and occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Nuovo GJ; Blanco JS; Leipzig S; Smith D
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 75(6):1006-11. PubMed ID: 2160630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The cytological prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in colposcopically directed biopsies.
Parham DM; Wiredu EK; Hussein KA
Cytopathology; 1991; 2(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 1801949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The appropriateness of examining the entire cervix histologically in hysterectomy specimens from women with a previous history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or dyskaryosis.
Greene A; Heatley MK
J Clin Pathol; 2001 Feb; 54(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11215286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytological and histological outcome following a borderline cervical smear.
Rawal N; Saridogan E; Weekes AW; Haq Khan N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):419-21. PubMed ID: 12881086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An explanation for the problem of false-negative cervical smears.
Barton SE; Jenkins D; Hollingworth A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Apr; 96(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 2751964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of repeat cytology in women with mildly dyskaryotic smears.
Giles JA; Deery A; Crow J; Walker P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Sep; 96(9):1067-70. PubMed ID: 2804009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Serial quantitation of HPV-16 in the smears of women with mild and moderate dyskaryosis.
Flannelly G; Jiang G; Anderson D; Melvin W; Mann E; Kitchener H
J Med Virol; 1995 Sep; 47(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 8551261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Regular audit of colposcopic biopsies from women with a mildly dyskaryotic or borderline cervical smear results in fewer cases of CINIII.
Jones MH; Jenkins D; Singer A
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8833870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
