253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040211)
1. Plumage micro-organisms and preen gland size in an urbanizing context.
Giraudeau M; Stikeleather R; McKenna J; Hutton P; McGraw KJ
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 580():425-429. PubMed ID: 28040211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of preen oil on plumage bacteria: an experimental test with the mallard.
Giraudeau M; Czirják GÁ; Duval C; Bretagnolle V; Gutierrez C; Guillon N; Heeb P
Behav Processes; 2013 Jan; 92():1-5. PubMed ID: 22940115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Preen gland removal increases plumage bacterial load but not that of feather-degrading bacteria.
Czirják GA; Pap PL; Vágási CI; Giraudeau M; Mureşan C; Mirleau P; Heeb P
Naturwissenschaften; 2013 Feb; 100(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 23288399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental study of the effect of preen oil against feather bacteria in passerine birds.
Alt G; Mägi M; Lodjak J; Mänd R
Oecologia; 2020 Mar; 192(3):723-733. PubMed ID: 31980936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preen oil and bird fitness: a critical review of the evidence.
Moreno-Rueda G
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 Nov; 92(4):2131-2143. PubMed ID: 28231637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birds, feather-degrading bacteria and preen glands: the antimicrobial activity of preen gland secretions from turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo) is amplified by keratinase.
Braun MS; Sporer F; Zimmermann S; Wink M
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2018 Sep; 94(9):. PubMed ID: 29901706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of access to preen gland secretions on mallard plumage.
Giraudeau M; Duval C; Guillon N; Bretagnolle V; Gutierrez C; Heeb P
Naturwissenschaften; 2010 Jun; 97(6):577-81. PubMed ID: 20437221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uropygial gland size and composition varies according to experimentally modified microbiome in Great tits.
Jacob S; Immer A; Leclaire S; Parthuisot N; Ducamp C; Espinasse G; Heeb P
BMC Evol Biol; 2014 Jun; 14():134. PubMed ID: 24938652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do feather-degrading bacteria actually degrade feather colour? No significant effects of plumage microbiome modifications on feather colouration in wild great tits.
Jacob S; Colmas L; Parthuisot N; Heeb P
Naturwissenschaften; 2014 Nov; 101(11):929-38. PubMed ID: 25228345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of genotype, sex, and feed restriction on the biochemical composition of chicken preen gland secretions and their implications for commercial poultry production.
Gvoždíková Javůrková V; Doležal P; Fraňková A; Horák M; Chodová D; Langrová I; Tůmová E
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36547363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preen gland function in layer fowls: factors affecting preen oil fatty acid composition.
Sandilands V; Powell K; Keeling L; Savory CJ
Br Poult Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 15115208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EFFECTS OF MYCOPLASMA GALLISEPTICUM INFECTION ON PREENING BEHAVIORS AND FEATHER QUALITY IN HOUSE FINCHES (HAEMORHOUS MEXICANUS).
Alms DM; Langager MM; Weitzman CL; Hawley DM
J Wildl Dis; 2023 Apr; 59(2):259-268. PubMed ID: 37179489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feather bacterial load shapes the trade-off between preening and immunity in pigeons.
Leclaire S; Czirják GÁ; Hammouda A; Gasparini J
BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Apr; 15():60. PubMed ID: 25881311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The evolution of size of the uropygial gland: mutualistic feather mites and uropygial secretion reduce bacterial loads of eggshells and hatching failures of European birds.
Soler JJ; Peralta-Sánchez JM; Martín-Platero AM; Martín-Vivaldi M; Martínez-Bueno M; Møller AP
J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1779-91. PubMed ID: 22805098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bacteria as an agent for change in structural plumage color: correlational and experimental evidence.
Shawkey MD; Pillai SR; Hill GE; Siefferman LM; Roberts SR
Am Nat; 2007 Jan; 169 Suppl 1():S112-21. PubMed ID: 19426087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Do feather-degrading bacteria affect sexually selected plumage color?
Shawkey MD; Pillai SR; Hill GE
Naturwissenschaften; 2009 Jan; 96(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 18853129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plumage iridescence is associated with distinct feather microbiota in a tropical passerine.
Javůrková VG; Enbody ED; Kreisinger J; Chmel K; Mrázek J; Karubian J
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):12921. PubMed ID: 31501471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chemical regulation of body feather microbiota in a wild bird.
Jacob S; Sallé L; Zinger L; Chaine AS; Ducamp C; Boutault L; Russell AF; Heeb P
Mol Ecol; 2018 Apr; 27(7):1727-1738. PubMed ID: 29533479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Manipulation of parental effort affects plumage bacterial load in a wild passerine.
Alt G; Saag P; Mägi M; Kisand V; Mänd R
Oecologia; 2015 Jun; 178(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 25663331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Defenses against keratinolytic bacteria in birds living in radioactively contaminated areas.
Ruiz-Rodríguez M; Møller AP; Mousseau TA; Soler JJ
Naturwissenschaften; 2016 Oct; 103(9-10):71. PubMed ID: 27542091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
