These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040330)

  • 1. Quality assurance of anatomic pathology diagnoses: Comparison of alternate approaches.
    Layfield LJ; Frazier SR
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Feb; 213(2):126-129. PubMed ID: 28040330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Mahood LK; Parwani AV; Kuan SF; Rao UN
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Dec; 130(6):905-12. PubMed ID: 19019767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
    Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Aug; 140(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 23897257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of diagnostic error in anatomical pathology and the role and value of second opinions in error prevention.
    Peck M; Moffat D; Latham B; Badrick T
    J Clin Pathol; 2018 Nov; 71(11):995-1000. PubMed ID: 30068638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amended reports in surgical pathology and implications for diagnostic error detection and avoidance: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study of 1,667,547 accessioned cases in 359 laboratories.
    Nakhleh RE; Zarbo RJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Apr; 122(4):303-9. PubMed ID: 9648896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection and classification of diagnostic discrepancies (errors) in surgical pathology.
    Roy JE; Hunt JL
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Sep; 17(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 20733354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of inter-institutional anatomic pathology slide review: a survey of current practice.
    Gupta D; Layfield LJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2000 Feb; 24(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 10680896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance measures for critical diagnoses in anatomic pathology.
    Renshaw A; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 137(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 22338060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance in dermatopathology: A review of report amendments.
    Cocks M; Gru AA
    J Cutan Pathol; 2021 Jan; 48(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 32740937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
    Safrin RE; Bark CJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective peer review in surgical pathology.
    Lind AC; Bewtra C; Healy JC; Sims KL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):560-6. PubMed ID: 7572817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.
    Nakhleh RE; Idowu MO; Souers RJ; Meier FA; Bekeris LG
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2011 Aug; 135(8):969-74. PubMed ID: 21809987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Directed peer review in surgical pathology.
    Smith ML; Raab SS
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2012 Sep; 19(5):331-7. PubMed ID: 22885382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretive Diagnostic Error Reduction in Surgical Pathology and Cytology: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center and the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology.
    Nakhleh RE; Nosé V; Colasacco C; Fatheree LA; Lillemoe TJ; McCrory DC; Meier FA; Otis CN; Owens SR; Raab SS; Turner RR; Ventura CB; Renshaw AA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Jan; 140(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 25965939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pediatric surgical pathology: pitfalls and strategies for error prevention.
    Coffin CM
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2006 May; 130(5):610-2. PubMed ID: 16683872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic 'errors' in anatomical pathology: relevance to Australian laboratories.
    Leong AS; Braye S; Bhagwandeen B
    Pathology; 2006 Dec; 38(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 17393975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.