These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040630)
1. PACE: Probabilistic Assessment for Contributor Estimation- A machine learning-based assessment of the number of contributors in DNA mixtures. Marciano MA; Adelman JD Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():82-91. PubMed ID: 28040630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developmental validation of PACE™: Automated artifact identification and contributor estimation for use with GlobalFiler™ and PowerPlex® fusion 6c generated data. Marciano MA; Adelman JD Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102140. PubMed ID: 31536876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated estimation of the number of contributors in autosomal short tandem repeat profiles using a machine learning approach. Benschop CCG; van der Linden J; Hoogenboom J; Ypma R; Haned H Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102150. PubMed ID: 31476660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using simulated microhaplotype genotyping data to evaluate the value of machine learning algorithms for inferring DNA mixture contributor numbers. Wang H; Zhu Q; Huang Y; Cao Y; Hu Y; Wei Y; Wang Y; Hou T; Shan T; Dai X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhang J Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103008. PubMed ID: 38244524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating number of contributors in massively parallel sequencing data of STR loci. Young BA; Gettings KB; McCord B; Vallone PM Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():15-22. PubMed ID: 30312966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures. Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio. Slooten K Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile using decision trees. Kruijver M; Kelly H; Cheng K; Lin MH; Morawitz J; Russell L; Buckleton J; Bright JA Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102407. PubMed ID: 33197741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects. Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method. Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes. Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deconvoluting multi-person biological mixtures and accurate characterization and identification of separated contributors using non-targeted single-cell DNA sequencing. Kulhankova L; Bindels E; Kayser M; Mulugeta E Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103030. PubMed ID: 38513339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures. Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors. Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures. Slooten K Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles. Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method. Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation. Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines. Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture. Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]