324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040630)
1. PACE: Probabilistic Assessment for Contributor Estimation- A machine learning-based assessment of the number of contributors in DNA mixtures.
Marciano MA; Adelman JD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():82-91. PubMed ID: 28040630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Developmental validation of PACE™: Automated artifact identification and contributor estimation for use with GlobalFiler™ and PowerPlex® fusion 6c generated data.
Marciano MA; Adelman JD
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102140. PubMed ID: 31536876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated estimation of the number of contributors in autosomal short tandem repeat profiles using a machine learning approach.
Benschop CCG; van der Linden J; Hoogenboom J; Ypma R; Haned H
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102150. PubMed ID: 31476660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using simulated microhaplotype genotyping data to evaluate the value of machine learning algorithms for inferring DNA mixture contributor numbers.
Wang H; Zhu Q; Huang Y; Cao Y; Hu Y; Wei Y; Wang Y; Hou T; Shan T; Dai X; Zhang X; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Mar; 69():103008. PubMed ID: 38244524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating number of contributors in massively parallel sequencing data of STR loci.
Young BA; Gettings KB; McCord B; Vallone PM
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():15-22. PubMed ID: 30312966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the information content of likelihood ratios derived from complex mixtures.
Marsden CD; Rudin N; Inman K; Lohmueller KE
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():64-72. PubMed ID: 26851613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accurate assessment of the weight of evidence for DNA mixtures by integrating the likelihood ratio.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Mar; 27():1-16. PubMed ID: 27914277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile using decision trees.
Kruijver M; Kelly H; Cheng K; Lin MH; Morawitz J; Russell L; Buckleton J; Bright JA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jan; 50():102407. PubMed ID: 33197741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determining the number of contributors to DNA mixtures in the low-template regime: Exploring the impacts of sampling and detection effects.
Norsworthy S; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2018 May; 32():1-8. PubMed ID: 29453054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inference about the number of contributors to a DNA mixture: Comparative analyses of a Bayesian network approach and the maximum allele count method.
Biedermann A; Bozza S; Konis K; Taroni F
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 22534257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Facilitating complex DNA mixture interpretation by sequencing highly polymorphic haplotypes.
Voskoboinik L; Motro U; Darvasi A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jul; 35():136-140. PubMed ID: 29775859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deconvoluting multi-person biological mixtures and accurate characterization and identification of separated contributors using non-targeted single-cell DNA sequencing.
Kulhankova L; Bindels E; Kayser M; Mulugeta E
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2024 Jul; 71():103030. PubMed ID: 38513339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Least-square deconvolution: a framework for interpreting short tandem repeat mixtures.
Wang T; Xue N; Birdwell JD
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1284-97. PubMed ID: 17199614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. TrueAllele(®) Genotype Identification on DNA Mixtures Containing up to Five Unknown Contributors.
Perlin MW; Hornyak JM; Sugimoto G; Miller KW
J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jul; 60(4):857-68. PubMed ID: 26189920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A top-down approach to DNA mixtures.
Slooten K
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102250. PubMed ID: 32169810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internal validation of STRmix™ for the interpretation of single source and mixed DNA profiles.
Moretti TR; Just RS; Kehl SC; Willis LE; Buckleton JS; Bright JA; Taylor DA; Onorato AJ
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():126-144. PubMed ID: 28504203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method.
Zhu Q; Wang H; Cao Y; Huang Y; Wei Y; Hu Y; Dai X; Shan T; Wang Y; Zhang J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102874. PubMed ID: 37075688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferring the Number of Contributors to Complex DNA Mixtures Using Three Methods: Exploring the Limits of Low-Template DNA Interpretation.
Alfonse LE; Tejada G; Swaminathan H; Lun DS; Grgicak CM
J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27907229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A large-scale validation of NOCIt's a posteriori probability of the number of contributors and its integration into forensic interpretation pipelines.
Grgicak CM; Karkar S; Yearwood-Garcia X; Alfonse LE; Duffy KR; Lun DS
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102296. PubMed ID: 32339916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The predictive value of the maximum likelihood estimator of the number of contributors to a DNA mixture.
Haned H; Pène L; Sauvage F; Pontier D
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2011 Aug; 5(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 20488773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
