These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040686)

  • 1. Graphics help patients distinguish between urgent and non-urgent deviations in laboratory test results.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Scherer AM; Witteman HO; Solomon JB; Exe NL; Tarini BA; Fagerlin A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2017 May; 24(3):520-528. PubMed ID: 28040686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Primary Care Providers' Preferences and Concerns Regarding Specific Visual Displays for Returning Hemoglobin A1c Test Results to Patients.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Solomon JB; Scherer AM; Exe NL; Tarini BA; Fagerlin A; Witteman HO
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):796-804. PubMed ID: 31556795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Scherer AM; Witteman HO; Solomon JB; Exe NL; Fagerlin A
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e98. PubMed ID: 29581088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving the Understanding of Test Results by Substituting (Not Adding) Goal Ranges: Web-Based Between-Subjects Experiment.
    Scherer AM; Witteman HO; Solomon J; Exe NL; Fagerlin A; Zikmund-Fisher BJ
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Oct; 20(10):e11027. PubMed ID: 30341053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Animated graphics for comparing two risks: a cautionary tale.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Witteman HO; Fuhrel-Forbis A; Exe NL; Kahn VC; Dickson M
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Jul; 14(4):e106. PubMed ID: 22832208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The design and evaluation of a graphical display for laboratory data.
    Bauer DT; Guerlain S; Brown PJ
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2010; 17(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 20595309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. World-Wide Web-based graphical user interfaces for laboratory data.
    Keller D; Schaller WJ; Wong JS; de Groen PC
    Methods Inf Med; 2002; 41(5):411-3. PubMed ID: 12501813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of game-like interactive graphics on risk perceptions and decisions.
    Ancker JS; Weber EU; Kukafka R
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 20393103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems.
    Sittig DF; Murphy DR; Smith MW; Russo E; Wright A; Singh H
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4. PubMed ID: 25792704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A demonstration of ''less can be more'' in risk graphics.
    Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Fagerlin A; Ubel PA
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(6):661-71. PubMed ID: 20375419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contextualizing numeric clinical test results for gist comprehension: Implications for EHR patient portals.
    Morrow D; Azevedo RFL; Garcia-Retamero R; Hasegawa-Johnson M; Huang T; Schuh W; Gu K; Zhang Y
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Mar; 25(1):41-61. PubMed ID: 30688498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Presentation of laboratory test results in patient portals: influence of interface design on risk interpretation and visual search behaviour.
    Fraccaro P; Vigo M; Balatsoukas P; van der Veer SN; Hassan L; Williams R; Wood G; Sinha S; Buchan I; Peek N
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2018 Feb; 18(1):11. PubMed ID: 29433495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Presenting self-monitoring test results for consumers: the effects of graphical formats and age.
    Tao D; Yuan J; Qu X
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Aug; 25(8):1036-1046. PubMed ID: 29762686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tables or bar graphs? Presenting test results in electronic medical records.
    Brewer NT; Gilkey MB; Lillie SE; Hesse BW; Sheridan SL
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(4):545-53. PubMed ID: 22472914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Displaying uncertainty: investigating the effects of display format and specificity.
    Bisantz AM; Marsiglio SS; Munch J
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(4):777-96. PubMed ID: 16553066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of home care nurses' numeracy and graph literacy on comprehension of visual display information: implications for dashboard design.
    Dowding D; Merrill JA; Onorato N; Barrón Y; Rosati RJ; Russell D
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2018 Feb; 25(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 28460091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numbers, graphs and words - do we really understand the lab test results accessible via the patient portals?
    Bar-Lev S; Beimel D
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2020 Oct; 9(1):58. PubMed ID: 33115536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A portable graphical representation tool for phonocardiograms.
    Reed NE; Nie Y; Mahnke CB
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():3111-4. PubMed ID: 19963567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tabular, Annotated, Visual, or Trends + Contextual Information? Preferences for Online Laboratory Results Displays.
    Monkman H; MacDonald L; Joseph AL; Lesselroth BJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2024 Jan; 310():1041-1045. PubMed ID: 38269973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.