BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28040872)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).
    Aichmair A; Burgstaller JM; Schwenkglenks M; Steurer J; Porchet F; Brunner F; Farshad M;
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28040872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.
    Rampersaud YR; Tso P; Walker KR; Lewis SJ; Davey JR; Mahomed NN; Coyte PC
    Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):244-54. PubMed ID: 24239803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of revision neural decompression and instrumented fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the value of surgical intervention.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 22054639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Owens R; Karikari I; Agarwal V; Gottfried ON; Bagley CA; Isaacs RE; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 23231358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding the value of minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: the case of interspinous spacer devices.
    Tapp SJ; Martin BI; Tosteson TD; Lurie JD; Weinstein MC; Deyo RA; Mirza SK; Tosteson ANA
    Spine J; 2018 Apr; 18(4):584-592. PubMed ID: 28847740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interspinous process devices versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: cost-utility analysis.
    van den Akker-van Marle ME; Moojen WA; Arts MP; Vleggeert-Lankamp CL; Peul WC;
    Spine J; 2016 Jun; 16(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25452018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of multilevel hemilaminectomy for lumbar stenosis-associated radiculopathy.
    Parker SL; Fulchiero EC; Davis BJ; Adogwa O; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):705-11. PubMed ID: 21641874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing cost-effectiveness of X-Stop with minimally invasive decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lønne G; Johnsen LG; Aas E; Lydersen S; Andresen H; Rønning R; Nygaard ØP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(8):514-20. PubMed ID: 25608246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained of laminectomy and extension of instrumented fusion for adjacent-segment disease: defining the value of surgical intervention.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Feb; 16(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 22054637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Lumbar Decompression With and Without Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease in the Elderly.
    Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Tetreault L; Fehlings MG; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurgery; 2015 Oct; 77 Suppl 4():S116-24. PubMed ID: 26378349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-utility of lumbar decompression with or without fusion for patients with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Kim S; Mortaz Hedjri S; Coyte PC; Rampersaud YR
    Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 22169001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cost-effectiveness of interbody fusions versus posterolateral fusions in 137 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Bydon M; Macki M; Abt NB; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A; Sciubba DM
    Spine J; 2015 Mar; 15(3):492-8. PubMed ID: 25463402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The 2-year cost-effectiveness of 3 options to treat lumbar spinal stenosis patients.
    Udeh BL; Costandi S; Dalton JE; Ghosh R; Yousef H; Mekhail N
    Pain Pract; 2015 Feb; 15(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 24393198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of incidental durotomy on the outcome of decompression surgery in degenerative lumbar spinal canal stenosis: analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) data--a Swiss prospective multi-center cohort study.
    Ulrich NH; Burgstaller JM; Brunner F; Porchet F; Farshad M; Pichierri G; Steurer J; Held U;
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Apr; 17():170. PubMed ID: 27090431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A randomized controlled trial of the X-Stop interspinous distractor device versus laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis with 2-year quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness outcomes.
    Borg A; Hill CS; Nurboja B; Critchley G; Choi D
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Feb; 34(4):544-552. PubMed ID: 33530059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar discectomy and single-level fusion for spondylolisthesis: experience with the NeuroPoint-SD registry.
    Mummaneni PV; Whitmore RG; Curran JN; Ziewacz JE; Wadhwa R; Shaffrey CI; Asher AL; Heary RF; Cheng JS; Hurlbert RJ; Douglas AF; Smith JS; Malhotra NR; Dante SJ; Magge SN; Kaiser MG; Abbed KM; Resnick DK; Ghogawala Z
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Jun; 36(6):E3. PubMed ID: 24881635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparisons of direct costs, outcomes, and cost-utility of decompression surgery with fusion versus decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Yagi M; Fujita N; Okada E; Tsuji O; Nagoshi N; Tsuji T; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Watanabe K
    J Orthop Sci; 2018 Jul; 23(4):653-657. PubMed ID: 29699906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Influence of Single-level Versus Multilevel Decompression on the Outcome in Multisegmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Analysis of the Lumbar Spinal Outcome Study (LSOS) Data.
    Ulrich NH; Burgstaller JM; Held U; Winklhofer S; Farshad M; Pichierri G; Steurer J; Porchet F;
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1367-E1375. PubMed ID: 28059949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readmission rates after decompression surgery in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis among Medicare beneficiaries.
    Modhia U; Takemoto S; Braid-Forbes MJ; Weber M; Berven SH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):591-6. PubMed ID: 23324923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.