These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28042111)
1. Joint registries: what can we learn in 2016? Berry DJ Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1 Supple A):3-7. PubMed ID: 28042111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a Revision a Revision? An Analysis of National Arthroplasty Registries' Definitions of Revision. Liebs TR; Splietker F; Hassenpflug J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3421-30. PubMed ID: 25791442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of implant developers on published outcome and reproducibility of cohort-based clinical studies in arthroplasty. Labek G; Neumann D; Agreiter M; Schuh R; Böhler N J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():55-61. PubMed ID: 22262425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision of unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: not always a slam dunk! Sierra RJ; Kassel CA; Wetters NG; Berend KR; Della Valle CJ; Lombardi AV J Arthroplasty; 2013 Sep; 28(8 Suppl):128-32. PubMed ID: 23886408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of patient and surgical factors on the rate of infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 64,566 joints from the New Zealand Joint Registry. Tayton ER; Frampton C; Hooper GJ; Young SW Bone Joint J; 2016 Mar; 98-B(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 26920958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Revision total joint arthroplasty: the epidemiology of 63,140 cases in New York State. Bansal A; Khatib ON; Zuckerman JD J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 23680502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty. de Steiger RN; Muratoglu O; Lorimer M; Cuthbert AR; Graves SE Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 26119884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: 11 years and 73,000 arthroplasties. Havelin LI; Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Furnes O; Lie SA; Vollset SE Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Aug; 71(4):337-53. PubMed ID: 11028881 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bone loss during revision of unicompartmental to total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of implanted polyethylene thickness from the National Joint Registry data. Sarraf KM; Konan S; Pastides PS; Haddad FS; Oussedik S J Arthroplasty; 2013 Oct; 28(9):1571-4. PubMed ID: 23538124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sex and risk of hip implant failure: assessing total hip arthroplasty outcomes in the United States. Inacio MC; Ake CF; Paxton EW; Khatod M; Wang C; Gross TP; Kaczmarek RG; Marinac-Dabic D; Sedrakyan A JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Mar; 173(6):435-41. PubMed ID: 23420484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Norwegian Joint Registry. Havelin LI Bull Hosp Jt Dis; 1999; 58(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 10642863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry. Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery. Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Joint Registries: a Ptolemaic model of data interpretation? Konan S; Haddad FS Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1585-6. PubMed ID: 24293585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Outlier analysis in orthopaedics: use of CUSUM: the Scottish Arthroplasty Project: shouldering the burden of improvement. Macpherson GJ; Brenkel IJ; Smith R; Howie CR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Dec; 93 Suppl 3():81-8. PubMed ID: 22262430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome Predictors in Prosthetic Joint Infections--Validation of a risk stratification score for Prosthetic Joint Infections in 120 cases. Wimmer MD; Randau TM; Friedrich MJ; Ploeger MM; Schmolder J; Strauss AC; Pennekamp PH; Vavken P; Gravius S Acta Orthop Belg; 2016 Mar; 82(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 26984667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing revision risk following 15 740 single-brand hybrid hip arthroplasties: a cohort study from a National Joint Registry. Jameson SS; Mason JM; Baker PN; Jettoo P; Deehan DJ; Reed MR J Arthroplasty; 2013 Aug; 28(7):1152-1159.e1. PubMed ID: 23523210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of cemented femoral stem choice on the incidence of revision for periprosthetic fracture after primary total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of national joint registry data. Palan J; Smith MC; Gregg P; Mellon S; Kulkarni A; Tucker K; Blom AW; Murray DW; Pandit H Bone Joint J; 2016 Oct; 98-B(10):1347-1354. PubMed ID: 27694588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]