These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28042722)

  • 1. M6-C artificial disc placement.
    Coric D; Parish J; Boltes MO
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Jan; 42(VideoSuppl1):V6. PubMed ID: 28042722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing the M6-C compressible cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 5-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study.
    Phillips FM; Coric D; Sasso R; Lanman T; Lavelle W; Lauryssen C; Albert T; Cammisa F; Milam RA
    Spine J; 2024 Feb; 24(2):219-230. PubMed ID: 37951477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing M6-C compressible six degrees of freedom cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 2-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study.
    Phillips FM; Coric D; Sasso R; Lanman T; Lavelle W; Blumenthal S; Lauryssen C; Guyer R; Albert T; Zigler J; Cammisa F; Milam RA
    Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):239-252. PubMed ID: 33096243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: Clinical article.
    Burkus JK; Traynelis VC; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Oct; 21(4):516-28. PubMed ID: 25036218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up.
    Jackson RJ; Davis RJ; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Hisey MS; Kim KD; Gaede SE; Nunley PD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):734-45. PubMed ID: 26799118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies.
    Radcliff K; Lerner J; Yang C; Bernard T; Zigler JE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 May; 24(5):760-8. PubMed ID: 26824587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reversal of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with cervical artificial disc replacement: regain motion after 9 years fusion.
    Tian W; Han X; Li ZY; Mao JP; Sun YQ; James Albert T
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Feb; 26(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 21964454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review.
    Harrod CC; Hilibrand AS; Fischer DJ; Skelly AC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Oct; 37(22 Suppl):S96-S112. PubMed ID: 22872222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical outcomes with selectively constrained SECURE-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two-year results from a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Vaccaro A; Beutler W; Peppelman W; Marzluff JM; Highsmith J; Mugglin A; DeMuth G; Gudipally M; Baker KJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Dec; 38(26):2227-39. PubMed ID: 24335629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Heterotopic ossification following single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results from the prospective, multicenter, historically controlled trial comparing allograft to an optimized dose of rhBMP-2.
    Arnold PM; Anderson KK; Selim A; Dryer RF; Kenneth Burkus J
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Sep; 25(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 27129045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.
    Matgé G; Berthold C; Gunness VR; Hana A; Hertel F
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar; 22(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 25555050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials.
    Upadhyaya CD; Wu JC; Trost G; Haid RW; Traynelis VC; Tay B; Coric D; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Mar; 16(3):216-28. PubMed ID: 22195608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reoperations in cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior cervical fusion: results compiled from multiple prospective food and drug administration investigational device exemption trials conducted at a single site.
    Blumenthal SL; Ohnmeiss DD; Guyer RD; Zigler JE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(14):1177-82. PubMed ID: 23429685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site.
    Coric D; Kim PK; Clemente JD; Boltes MO; Nussbaum M; James S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 23140129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Analysis of the results of total cervical disc arthroplasty using a M6-C prosthesis: a multicenter study].
    Byval'tsev VA; Kalinin AA; Stepanov IA; Pestryakov YY; Shepelev VV
    Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2017; 81(5):46-55. PubMed ID: 29076467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utilization trends of cervical artificial disc replacement during the FDA investigational device exemption clinical trials compared to anterior cervical fusion.
    Qureshi SA; Koehler SM; Lu Y; Cho S; Hecht AC
    J Clin Neurosci; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1723-6. PubMed ID: 23972533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and Safety of Total Disc Replacement compared with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Disease: A Meta-analysis.
    Cai S; Tian Y; Zhang J; Hu J; Chen F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Oct; 45(20):1419-1425. PubMed ID: 32453243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.